Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(155)

Unified Diff: net/http/http_response_headers.cc

Issue 455623003: stale-while-revalidate experimental implementation. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: Support the bandwidth reduction proxy. Created 6 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/http/http_response_headers.cc
diff --git a/net/http/http_response_headers.cc b/net/http/http_response_headers.cc
index 3a9f7e04fe0c4bad6a232ae52270e55427532d03..69eef0c4c38744ab338c62bea00b2b4068d1b5a9 100644
--- a/net/http/http_response_headers.cc
+++ b/net/http/http_response_headers.cc
@@ -956,15 +956,29 @@ bool HttpResponseHeaders::IsRedirectResponseCode(int response_code) {
// Of course, there are other factors that can force a response to always be
// validated or re-fetched.
//
-bool HttpResponseHeaders::RequiresValidation(const Time& request_time,
- const Time& response_time,
- const Time& current_time) const {
- TimeDelta lifetime =
- GetFreshnessLifetime(response_time);
- if (lifetime == TimeDelta())
- return true;
-
- return lifetime <= GetCurrentAge(request_time, response_time, current_time);
+// From RFC 5861 section 3, a stale response may be used while revalidation is
+// performed in the background if
+//
+// freshness_lifetime + stale_while_revalidate > current_age
+//
+HttpResponseHeaders::ValidationType HttpResponseHeaders::RequiresValidation(
+ const Time& request_time,
+ const Time& response_time,
+ const Time& current_time) const {
+ TimeDelta lifetime;
+ if (GetFreshnessLifetime(response_time, &lifetime) == NEVER_FRESH)
+ return VALIDATION_SYNCHRONOUS;
+ TimeDelta age = GetCurrentAge(request_time, response_time, current_time);
+
+ if (lifetime > age)
+ return VALIDATION_NONE;
+
+ TimeDelta stale_while_revalidate;
+ if (GetStaleWhileRevalidateValue(&stale_while_revalidate) &&
+ lifetime + stale_while_revalidate > age)
+ return VALIDATION_ASYNCHRONOUS;
+
+ return VALIDATION_SYNCHRONOUS;
}
// From RFC 2616 section 13.2.4:
@@ -987,8 +1001,9 @@ bool HttpResponseHeaders::RequiresValidation(const Time& request_time,
//
// freshness_lifetime = (date_value - last_modified_value) * 0.10
//
-TimeDelta HttpResponseHeaders::GetFreshnessLifetime(
- const Time& response_time) const {
+HttpResponseHeaders::FreshnessType HttpResponseHeaders::GetFreshnessLifetime(
+ const Time& response_time,
+ TimeDelta* lifetime) const {
// Check for headers that force a response to never be fresh. For backwards
// compat, we treat "Pragma: no-cache" as a synonym for "Cache-Control:
// no-cache" even though RFC 2616 does not specify it.
@@ -996,17 +1011,17 @@ TimeDelta HttpResponseHeaders::GetFreshnessLifetime(
HasHeaderValue("cache-control", "no-store") ||
HasHeaderValue("pragma", "no-cache") ||
HasHeaderValue("vary", "*")) // see RFC 2616 section 13.6
- return TimeDelta(); // not fresh
+ return NEVER_FRESH;
yhirano 2014/08/27 09:24:29 You should clear *lifetime here. Reverting L1007 c
Adam Rice 2014/08/28 03:14:35 Done.
// NOTE: "Cache-Control: max-age" overrides Expires, so we only check the
// Expires header after checking for max-age in GetFreshnessLifetime. This
// is important since "Expires: <date in the past>" means not fresh, but
// it should not trump a max-age value.
- TimeDelta max_age_value;
- if (GetMaxAgeValue(&max_age_value))
- return max_age_value;
+ if (GetMaxAgeValue(lifetime))
+ return MAYBE_FRESH;
+ *lifetime = TimeDelta();
// If there is no Date header, then assume that the server response was
// generated at the time when we received the response.
Time date_value;
@@ -1016,10 +1031,12 @@ TimeDelta HttpResponseHeaders::GetFreshnessLifetime(
Time expires_value;
if (GetExpiresValue(&expires_value)) {
// The expires value can be a date in the past!
- if (expires_value > date_value)
- return expires_value - date_value;
+ if (expires_value > date_value) {
+ *lifetime = expires_value - date_value;
+ return MAYBE_FRESH;
+ }
- return TimeDelta(); // not fresh
+ return NEVER_FRESH;
}
// From RFC 2616 section 13.4:
@@ -1052,19 +1069,22 @@ TimeDelta HttpResponseHeaders::GetFreshnessLifetime(
// TODO(darin): Implement a smarter heuristic.
Time last_modified_value;
if (GetLastModifiedValue(&last_modified_value)) {
- // The last-modified value can be a date in the past!
- if (last_modified_value <= date_value)
- return (date_value - last_modified_value) / 10;
+ // The last-modified value can be a date in the future!
+ if (last_modified_value <= date_value) {
+ *lifetime = (date_value - last_modified_value) / 10;
+ return MAYBE_FRESH;
+ }
}
}
// These responses are implicitly fresh (unless otherwise overruled):
if (response_code_ == 300 || response_code_ == 301 || response_code_ == 308 ||
response_code_ == 410) {
- return TimeDelta::Max();
+ *lifetime = TimeDelta::Max();
+ return MAYBE_FRESH;
}
- return TimeDelta(); // not fresh
+ return NEVER_FRESH;
}
// From RFC 2616 section 13.2.3:

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698