|
|
Created:
6 years, 4 months ago by Mads Ager (chromium) Modified:
6 years, 4 months ago CC:
blink-reviews, blink-reviews-css, ed+blinkwatch_opera.com, dglazkov+blink, apavlov+blink_chromium.org, darktears, rune+blink, rwlbuis Base URL:
svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk Project:
blink Visibility:
Public. |
DescriptionGo through root to get loading clients in StyleSheetContents::checkLoaded.
I accidentally used m_loadingClients instead of root->m_loadingClients
in https://codereview.chromium.org/196653006
R=esprehn@chromium.org, haraken@chromium.org
Patch Set 1 #
Messages
Total messages: 17 (0 generated)
LGTM
No test? To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-reviews+unsubscribe@chromium.org.
Thanks Haraken. I'll go ahead and commit this. It is unfortunate that there are no tests that fail because of this. I'm not familiar enough with how to exercise this code path in examples. tasak, could you help out with attempting to write a regression test for this issue as a follow-up?
On 2014/08/07 08:03:26, esprehn wrote: > No test? Yeah, I know. :( Unfortunately, I don't know the code well enough to know how to write a test for this. I'd like to commit this as the code that I wrote here is obviously missing the access through root. I'm asking tasak if he can help me create a regression test for this.
The CQ bit was checked by ager@chromium.org
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/ager@chromium.org/444223004/1
I filed http://crbug.com/401392 to track the addition of a regression test for this.
tasak@ is now trying to figure out how to write a test. So let's wait for his response, given that this isn't cause any serious crash.
The CQ bit was unchecked by haraken@chromium.org
On 2014/08/07 08:18:34, haraken wrote: > tasak@ is now trying to figure out how to write a test. So let's wait for his > response, given that this isn't cause any serious crash. I will create a layout test for this. I think, the old code has style recalc problem.
On 2014/08/07 08:30:03, tasak wrote: > On 2014/08/07 08:18:34, haraken wrote: > > tasak@ is now trying to figure out how to write a test. So let's wait for his > > response, given that this isn't cause any serious crash. > > I will create a layout test for this. I think, the old code has style recalc > problem. Thank you! :)
On 2014/08/07 13:10:36, tasak wrote: I think, I found how to test this patch. I will create a layout test tomorrow (JST).
On 2014/08/07 13:12:00, tasak wrote: > On 2014/08/07 13:10:36, tasak wrote: > > I think, I found how to test this patch. I will create a layout test tomorrow > (JST). That is excellent. Thanks tasak. Feel free to upload the layout test and the trivial fix as a separate code review and land it when you are done. Then I'll close this issue. :)
On 2014/08/07 13:14:24, Mads Ager (chromium) wrote: > On 2014/08/07 13:12:00, tasak wrote: > > On 2014/08/07 13:10:36, tasak wrote: > > > > I think, I found how to test this patch. I will create a layout test tomorrow > > (JST). > > That is excellent. Thanks tasak. Feel free to upload the layout test and the > trivial fix as a separate code review and land it when you are done. Then I'll > close this issue. :) I uploaded a patch: https://codereview.chromium.org/456673002 Finally, I found that we need ASSERT(root==this);
On 2014/08/08 08:41:55, tasak wrote: > On 2014/08/07 13:14:24, Mads Ager (chromium) wrote: > > On 2014/08/07 13:12:00, tasak wrote: > > > On 2014/08/07 13:10:36, tasak wrote: > > > > > > I think, I found how to test this patch. I will create a layout test > tomorrow > > > (JST). > > > > That is excellent. Thanks tasak. Feel free to upload the layout test and the > > trivial fix as a separate code review and land it when you are done. Then I'll > > close this issue. :) > > I uploaded a patch: > https://codereview.chromium.org/456673002 > > Finally, I found that we need ASSERT(root==this); Thanks for investigating. Closing this issues. :) |