Index: net/http/http_security_headers_unittest.cc |
diff --git a/net/http/http_security_headers_unittest.cc b/net/http/http_security_headers_unittest.cc |
index ce919ff81f39455739be69855779f1f2f5f96bed..694bab9aa6e04094c9fb0103e165d110f981356b 100644 |
--- a/net/http/http_security_headers_unittest.cc |
+++ b/net/http/http_security_headers_unittest.cc |
@@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, ValidPKPHeadersSHA256) { |
TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, UpdateDynamicPKPOnly) { |
TransportSecurityState state; |
+ state.enable_static_pinning_ = true; |
Ryan Sleevi
2014/08/07 22:19:07
pedantry: enable_static_pins_
Also, feels like th
Ryan Hamilton
2014/08/07 22:49:38
Heh, I did that first and then switched it. Should
|
TransportSecurityState::DomainState static_domain_state; |
// docs.google.com has preloaded pins. |
@@ -554,8 +555,10 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, UpdateDynamicPKPOnly) { |
HashValueVector hashes; |
hashes.push_back(good_hash); |
std::string failure_log; |
+ const bool is_issued_by_known_root = true; |
EXPECT_TRUE( |
- state.CheckPublicKeyPins(domain, sni_enabled, hashes, &failure_log)); |
+ state.CheckPublicKeyPins(domain, sni_enabled, is_issued_by_known_root, |
+ hashes, &failure_log)); |
TransportSecurityState::DomainState new_dynamic_domain_state; |
EXPECT_TRUE(state.GetDynamicDomainState(domain, &new_dynamic_domain_state)); |
@@ -580,6 +583,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, UpdateDynamicPKPOnly) { |
#endif |
TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, MAYBE_UpdateDynamicPKPMaxAge0) { |
TransportSecurityState state; |
+ state.enable_static_pinning_ = true; |
Ryan Sleevi
2014/08/07 22:19:07
I think this would be better moved to line 590, si
Ryan Hamilton
2014/08/07 22:49:39
Done.
|
TransportSecurityState::DomainState static_domain_state; |
// docs.google.com has preloaded pins. |
@@ -648,8 +652,10 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, MAYBE_UpdateDynamicPKPMaxAge0) { |
// Damage the hashes to cause a pin validation failure. |
new_static_domain_state2.pkp.spki_hashes[0].data()[0] ^= 0x80; |
new_static_domain_state2.pkp.spki_hashes[1].data()[0] ^= 0x80; |
+ const bool is_issued_by_known_root = true; |
EXPECT_FALSE(state.CheckPublicKeyPins( |
- domain, true, new_static_domain_state2.pkp.spki_hashes, &failure_log)); |
+ domain, true, is_issued_by_known_root, |
+ new_static_domain_state2.pkp.spki_hashes, &failure_log)); |
EXPECT_NE(0UL, failure_log.length()); |
} |
#undef MAYBE_UpdateDynamicPKPMaxAge0 |
@@ -659,6 +665,7 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, MAYBE_UpdateDynamicPKPMaxAge0) { |
// dynamic HPKP entry could not affect the HSTS entry for the site. |
TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, NoClobberPins) { |
TransportSecurityState state; |
+ state.enable_static_pinning_ = true; |
Ryan Sleevi
2014/08/07 22:19:07
ditto on the shuffle - 672
Ryan Hamilton
2014/08/07 22:49:38
Done.
|
TransportSecurityState::DomainState domain_state; |
// accounts.google.com has preloaded pins. |
@@ -680,8 +687,10 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, NoClobberPins) { |
EXPECT_TRUE(state.AddHSTSHeader(domain, "includesubdomains; max-age=10000")); |
EXPECT_TRUE(state.ShouldUpgradeToSSL(domain, sni_enabled)); |
std::string failure_log; |
+ const bool is_issued_by_known_root = true; |
EXPECT_TRUE(state.CheckPublicKeyPins( |
- domain, sni_enabled, saved_hashes, &failure_log)); |
+ domain, sni_enabled, is_issued_by_known_root, saved_hashes, |
+ &failure_log)); |
// Add an HPKP header, which should only update the dynamic state. |
HashValue good_hash = GetTestHashValue(1, HASH_VALUE_SHA1); |
@@ -702,7 +711,8 @@ TEST_F(HttpSecurityHeadersTest, NoClobberPins) { |
// The dynamic pins, which do not match |saved_hashes|, should take |
// precedence over the static pins and cause the check to fail. |
EXPECT_FALSE(state.CheckPublicKeyPins( |
- domain, sni_enabled, saved_hashes, &failure_log)); |
+ domain, sni_enabled, is_issued_by_known_root, saved_hashes, |
+ &failure_log)); |
} |
}; // namespace net |