LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/cache-add-expected.txt - Issue 425413002: [ServiceWorker] Tests for Cache

Side by Side Diff: LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/cache-add-expected.txt

Issue 425413002: [ServiceWorker] Tests for Cache (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk

Patch Set: Updates tests to comply with spec changes Created 6 years, 2 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log

« no previous file with comments | « LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/cache-add.html ('k') | LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/cache-match.html » ('j') | LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/resources/cache-add-worker.js » ('J')
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

OLD	NEW
(Empty)
	1 This is a testharness.js-based test.

	2 PASS Service Worker: Cache.add and Cache.addAll

	3 FAIL Cache.add with no arguments Failed to execute 'add' on 'Cache': 1 argument required, but only 0 present.(stack: TypeError: Failed to execute 'add' on 'Cach e': 1 argument required, but only 0 present.
	jsbell 2014/10/23 00:15:31 Weird - is it actually throwing instead of rejec Weird - is it actually throwing instead of rejecting? I'll dig in - the bindings code should be taking care of this automagically. asanka 2014/10/23 06:12:39 Acknowledged. Show quoted text On 2014/10/23 00:15:31, jsbell wrote: > Weird - is it actually throwing instead of rejecting? I'll dig in - the > bindings code should be taking care of this automagically. Acknowledged. asanka 2014/10/23 06:12:39 Acknowledged. Show quoted text On 2014/10/23 00:15:31, jsbell wrote: > Weird - is it actually throwing instead of rejecting? I'll dig in - the > bindings code should be taking care of this automagically. Acknowledged.
	4 at TypeError (native)

	5 at http://127.0.0.1:8000/serviceworker/resources/cache-add-worker.js:6:13)

	6 FAIL Cache.add with successful request Cache is not implemented

	7 FAIL Cache.add with non-HTTP/HTTPS URL assert_throws: Cache.add with non-HTTP/HT TPS URL should throw a NetworkError. function "function () { throw e; }" threw o bject "NotSupportedError: Cache is not implemented" that is not a DOMException N etworkError: property "code" is equal to 9, expected 19

	8 FAIL Cache.add with Request object Cache is not implemented

	9 FAIL Cache.add with a used Request object assert_throws: Cache.add with a Reques t object with a used body should reject with a TypeError. function "function () { throw e; }" threw object "NotFoundError: Entry was not found." ("NotFoundError ") expected object "TypeError" ("TypeError")
	jsbell 2014/10/23 00:15:31 Any idea why this is NotFoundError instead of NotS Any idea why this is NotFoundError instead of NotSupportedError (not implemented) ? asanka 2014/10/23 06:12:39 Couldn't dig into this one yet. Show quoted text On 2014/10/23 00:15:31, jsbell wrote: > Any idea why this is NotFoundError instead of NotSupportedError (not > implemented) ? Couldn't dig into this one yet.
	10 FAIL Cache.add called twice with same Request Cache is not implemented

	11 FAIL Cache.add with resource that results in a status of 404 Cache is not implem ented

	12 FAIL Cache.add with resource that results in a status of 500 Cache is not implem ented

	13 PASS Cache.addAll with no arguments

	14 PASS Cache.addAll with undefined arguments

	15 FAIL Cache.addAll with ScalarValueString arguments Cache is not implemented

	16 FAIL Cache.addAll with Request arguments Cache is not implemented

	17 FAIL Cache.addAll with failing request Cache is not implemented

	18 FAIL Cache.addAll with the same Request twice assert_throws: Cache.addAll should throw TypeError if the same request is added twice. function "function () { thr ow e; }" threw object "NotSupportedError: Cache is not implemented" ("NotSupport edError") expected object "TypeError" ("TypeError")

	19 Harness: the test ran to completion.

	20

OLD	NEW