Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1130)

Unified Diff: net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc

Issue 422063004: Certificate Transparency: Require SCTs for EV certificates. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: datatype issues addressed. Created 6 years, 2 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
diff --git a/net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc b/net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68df3faa02cd4e681380c30eb380684525fbb8bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "net/cert/cert_policy_enforcer.h"
+
+#include <string>
+
+#include "base/memory/scoped_ptr.h"
+#include "net/cert/ct_verify_result.h"
+#include "net/cert/x509_certificate.h"
+#include "net/test/cert_test_util.h"
+#include "net/test/ct_test_util.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace net {
+
+namespace {
+
+class CertPolicyEnforcerTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ public:
+ virtual void SetUp() override {
+ policy_enforcer_.reset(new CertPolicyEnforcer(3));
+ CertPolicyEnforcer::SetEnforceCTEVPolicy(true);
Ryan Sleevi 2014/10/22 19:48:36 This test has global effect that isn't reset. (As
Eran Messeri 2014/10/24 12:12:36 Good point - now that it's not a global state, thi
+
+ std::string der_test_cert(ct::GetDerEncodedX509Cert());
+ chain_ = X509Certificate::CreateFromBytes(der_test_cert.data(),
+ der_test_cert.length());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(chain_.get());
+ }
+
+ void FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::Origin desired_origin,
+ int num_scts,
+ ct::CTVerifyResult* result) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_scts; ++i) {
+ scoped_refptr<ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp> sct(
+ new ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp());
+ sct->origin = desired_origin;
+ result->verified_scts.push_back(sct);
+ }
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ scoped_ptr<CertPolicyEnforcer> policy_enforcer_;
+ scoped_refptr<X509Certificate> chain_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(CertPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithNonEmbeddedSCTs) {
+ ct::CTVerifyResult result;
+ FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_TLS_EXTENSION, 2, &result);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CertPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyWithEmbeddedSCTs) {
+ // We know that the chain_ is valid for 10 years - over 121 months - so
Ryan Sleevi 2014/10/22 19:48:36 Don't include pronouns in comments - https://group
Eran Messeri 2014/10/24 12:12:35 Done.
+ // requires 5 SCTs.
+ ct::CTVerifyResult result;
+ FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 5, &result);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CertPolicyEnforcerTest, ConformsToCTEVPolicyMixedOriginSCTs) {
+ ct::CTVerifyResult result;
+ FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_FROM_TLS_EXTENSION, 2, &result);
+ result.verified_scts[1]->origin =
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CertPolicyEnforcerTest, DoesNotConformToCTEVPolicyNotEnoughSCTs) {
+ // We know that the chain_ is valid for 10 years - over 121 months - so
+ // 5 SCTs are required. However, as there are only two logs, two SCTs
+ // will be required - so provide one to guarantee the test fails.
+ ct::CTVerifyResult result;
+ FillResultWithSCTsOfOrigin(
+ ct::SignedCertificateTimestamp::SCT_EMBEDDED, 1, &result);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(policy_enforcer_->DoesConformToCTEVPolicy(chain_.get(), result));
+}
+
Ryan Sleevi 2014/10/22 19:48:35 Seems like there's a lot of stuff in the enforcer
Eran Messeri 2014/10/24 12:12:35 Good point, added tests for all branches.
+} // namespace
+} // namespace net

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698