Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(39)

Issue 416983005: QUIC - Track the reason for sending InchoateClientHello in UMA (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 5 months ago by ramant (doing other things)
Modified:
6 years, 4 months ago
CC:
chromium-reviews, cbentzel+watch_chromium.org, asvitkine+watch_chromium.org, avd, jar (doing other things), wtc
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@chlo_histogram
Project:
chromium
Visibility:
Public.

Description

QUIC - Track the reason for sending InchoateClientHello in UMA histogram. Possible reasons are: no/empty server config, expired server config, invalid server config and corrupted server config. R=rch@chromium.org, asvitkine@chromium.org Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=285765

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : rebase TOT #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+50 lines, -1 line) Patch
M net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc View 1 4 chunks +34 lines, -1 line 2 comments Download
M tools/metrics/histograms/histograms.xml View 2 chunks +16 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 9 (0 generated)
ramant (doing other things)
We have seen that server is receiving lot of InchoateClientHello messages (in reject reason histogram). ...
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 04:32:15 UTC) #1
jar (doing other things)
lgtm
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 16:04:16 UTC) #2
Alexei Svitkine (slow)
lgtm
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 16:24:13 UTC) #3
ramant (doing other things)
The CQ bit was checked by rtenneti@chromium.org
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 18:46:05 UTC) #4
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/rtenneti@chromium.org/416983005/20001
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 18:47:18 UTC) #5
commit-bot: I haz the power
FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1). The failing builders are: linux_chromium_clang_dbg on tryserver.chromium ...
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-25 20:48:40 UTC) #6
commit-bot: I haz the power
Change committed as 285765
6 years, 5 months ago (2014-07-26 18:06:22 UTC) #7
wtc
Patch set 2 LGTM. https://codereview.chromium.org/416983005/diff/20001/net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc File net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/416983005/diff/20001/net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc#newcode90 net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc:90: if (scfg->GetUint64(kEXPY, &expiry_seconds) != QUIC_NO_ERROR ...
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-07-29 01:29:06 UTC) #8
ramant (doing other things)
6 years, 4 months ago (2014-07-29 23:52:32 UTC) #9
Message was sent while issue was closed.
https://codereview.chromium.org/416983005/diff/20001/net/quic/crypto/quic_cry...
File net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/416983005/diff/20001/net/quic/crypto/quic_cry...
net/quic/crypto/quic_crypto_client_config.cc:90: if (scfg->GetUint64(kEXPY,
&expiry_seconds) != QUIC_NO_ERROR ||
On 2014/07/29 01:29:06, wtc wrote:
> 
> Nit: scfg->GetUint64(kEXPY, &expiry_seconds) != QUIC_NO_ERROR is a separate
> error condition. It means the server config has an absent or invalid kEXPY
> value.

Thanks Wan-Teh. Fixed it in https://codereview.chromium.org/431483002/

Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698