|
|
DescriptionRoll Skia to f459c85457c
https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+log/bf0b9ced0b..f459c85457c
Updates Chrome GN and GYP for Pavel's SkTextureCompressor opts.
Due to http://crbug.com/393856, landing now
NOTRY=True
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=283230
Patch Set 1 #
Total comments: 3
Patch Set 2 : missing neon on arm64 #Patch Set 3 : distribute down #Patch Set 4 : make it a roll #Patch Set 5 : roll up #Patch Set 6 : more include dirs #Patch Set 7 : rebase #
Messages
Total messages: 32 (0 generated)
This needs to land as part of the CL that rolls with 390453002. Pavel, can you see if this makes sense? Hal, can you do this, or want me to do the roll?
https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/BUILD.gn File skia/BUILD.gn (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/BUILD.gn#newcode637 skia/BUILD.gn:637: # Non-Neon ARM code. Does one of these need a: "//third_party/skia/src/opts/SkTextureCompression_opts_none.cpp", ..? https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp File skia/skia_library_opts.gyp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp#n... skia/skia_library_opts.gyp:113: [ 'target_arch == "arm" and arm_version < 6', { Does one of these need either the "neon" or the "none" targets?
https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp File skia/skia_library_opts.gyp (right): https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp#n... skia/skia_library_opts.gyp:113: [ 'target_arch == "arm" and arm_version < 6', { On 2014/07/14 18:52:57, krajcevski wrote: > Does one of these need either the "neon" or the "none" targets? Not sure. I had the _arm.cpp unconditionally in both of these (in both files), but I've switched (both files) to use _arm.cpp for ARM v7+ and _none.cpp for ARM v6-. Seems like it's what we do for most optimizations.
lgtm On 2014/07/14 18:58:16, mtklein wrote: > https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp > File skia/skia_library_opts.gyp (right): > > https://codereview.chromium.org/389343005/diff/1/skia/skia_library_opts.gyp#n... > skia/skia_library_opts.gyp:113: [ 'target_arch == "arm" and arm_version < 6', { > On 2014/07/14 18:52:57, krajcevski wrote: > > Does one of these need either the "neon" or the "none" targets? > > Not sure. I had the _arm.cpp unconditionally in both of these (in both files), > but I've switched (both files) to use _arm.cpp for ARM v7+ and _none.cpp for ARM > v6-. Seems like it's what we do for most optimizations.
+reed
lgtm
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/70001
The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/90001
FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1). The failing builders are: win_chromium_x64_rel on tryserver.chromium (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_chromium_x64_rel/...) mac_gpu_triggered_tests on tryserver.chromium.gpu (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.gpu/builders/mac_gpu_triggered...)
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: mac_gpu_triggered_tests on tryserver.chromium.gpu (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.gpu/builders/mac_gpu_triggered...)
The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/90001
FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1). The failing builders are: win_chromium_x64_rel on tryserver.chromium (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_chromium_x64_rel/...) mac_gpu_triggered_tests on tryserver.chromium.gpu (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.gpu/builders/mac_gpu_triggered...)
The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org
Try jobs failed on following builders: mac_gpu_triggered_tests on tryserver.chromium.gpu (http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.gpu/builders/mac_gpu_triggered...)
The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/90001
We got a Patch failure. Can you rebase?
The CQ bit was checked by mtklein@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/110001
The CQ bit was unchecked by reed@google.com
The CQ bit was unchecked by halcanary@google.com
The CQ bit was checked by reed@google.com
The CQ bit was checked by halcanary@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/110001
FYI: held up by http://crbug.com/393856
The CQ bit was unchecked by reed@google.com
The CQ bit was checked by reed@google.com
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/mtklein@chromium.org/389343005/110001
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Change committed as 283230 |