Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(476)

Issues Search
    My Issues | Starred     Open | Closed | All

Unified Diff: components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc

Issue 383263005: Remove more CreateIntegerValue calls. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: s/SetBoolean/SetInteger Created 6 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_pref_store_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
diff --git a/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc b/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
index 51a47f8de0f4765016ba67258ca27d931c135689..36c9c2a485440f60b6eb577c34a22b972a528f25 100644
--- a/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
+++ b/components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_handler_unittest.cc
@@ -130,34 +130,49 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsClamp) {
IntRangePolicyHandler handler(kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are not rejected.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are not rejected
// (because clamping is enabled) but do yield a warning message.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -181,34 +196,49 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
IntRangePolicyHandler handler(kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, false);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are not rejected.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are rejected and yield
// an error message.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -233,45 +263,60 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, ApplyPolicySettingsClamp) {
IntRangePolicyHandler handler(kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are written to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(5));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(10));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are clamped and written
// to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(10));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
}
@@ -287,27 +332,36 @@ TEST(IntRangePolicyHandler, ApplyPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
IntRangePolicyHandler handler(kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are written to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(5));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
- expected.reset(base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10));
+ expected.reset(new base::FundamentalValue(10));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
}
@@ -322,34 +376,49 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsClamp) {
kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are not rejected.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are not rejected
// (because clamping is enabled) but do yield a warning message.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -373,34 +442,49 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, CheckPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, false);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are not rejected.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_TRUE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_TRUE(errors.empty());
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are rejected and yield
// an error message.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
errors.Clear();
EXPECT_FALSE(handler.CheckPolicySettings(policy_map, &errors));
EXPECT_FALSE(errors.empty());
@@ -426,24 +510,33 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, ApplyPolicySettingsClamp) {
kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are written to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.05));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.1));
@@ -452,16 +545,22 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, ApplyPolicySettingsClamp) {
// Check that values lying outside the accepted range are clamped and written
// to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(-5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(-5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(15), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(15),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.1));
@@ -481,24 +580,33 @@ TEST(IntPercentageToDoublePolicyHandler, ApplyPolicySettingsDontClamp) {
kTestPolicy, kTestPref, 0, 10, true);
// Check that values lying in the accepted range are written to the pref.
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(0), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(0),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.0));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(5), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(5),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.05));
EXPECT_TRUE(prefs.GetValue(kTestPref, &value));
EXPECT_TRUE(base::Value::Equals(expected.get(), value));
- policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy, POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
- POLICY_SCOPE_USER, base::Value::CreateIntegerValue(10), NULL);
+ policy_map.Set(kTestPolicy,
+ POLICY_LEVEL_MANDATORY,
+ POLICY_SCOPE_USER,
+ new base::FundamentalValue(10),
+ NULL);
prefs.Clear();
handler.ApplyPolicySettings(policy_map, &prefs);
expected.reset(base::Value::CreateDoubleValue(0.1));
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | components/policy/core/browser/configuration_policy_pref_store_unittest.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698