Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(440)

Unified Diff: mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h

Issue 380413003: Mojo: Use InterfaceFactory<Interface> for service registration (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: review feedback Created 6 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h
diff --git a/mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h b/mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h
index 2044af10a5a86cd935438839d92dc5a939abb25e..1784941896662e58c789f998f54d9387779454c0 100644
--- a/mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h
+++ b/mojo/public/cpp/application/application_connection.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <string>
+#include "mojo/public/cpp/application/interface_factory.h"
#include "mojo/public/cpp/application/lib/service_connector.h"
namespace mojo {
@@ -21,51 +22,26 @@ namespace mojo {
// to implement a service named Foo.
// That class must subclass an InterfaceImpl specialization.
//
-// If there is context that is to be shared amongst all instances, define a
-// constructor with that class as its only argument, otherwise define an empty
-// constructor.
+// Then implement an InterfaceFactory<Foo> that binds instances of FooImpl to
+// InterfaceRequest<Foo>s and register that on the connection.
//
-// class FooImpl : public InterfaceImpl<Foo> {
-// public:
-// explicit FooImpl(ApplicationConnnection* connection) {}
-// };
+// connection->AddServiceFactory(&factory);
//
-// or
+// Or if you have multiple factories implemented by the same type, explicitly
+// specify the interface to register the factory for:
//
-// class BarImpl : public InterfaceImpl<Bar> {
-// public:
-// // contexts will remain valid for the lifetime of BarImpl.
-// BarImpl(ApplicationConnnection* connection, BarContext* service_context)
-// : connection_(connection), servicecontext_(context) {}
+// connection->AddServiceFactory<Foo>(&my_foo_and_bar_factory_);
+// connection->AddServiceFactory<Bar>(&my_foo_and_bar_factory_);
//
-// Create an ApplicationDelegate instance and pass it to the constructor
-// of an ApplicationImpl. The delegate will be called when new connections are
-// made to other applications.
-//
-// connection->AddService<FooImpl>();
-//
-// BarContext context;
-// connection->AddService<BarImpl>(&context);
+// The InterfaceFactory must outlive the ApplicationConnection.
tim (not reviewing) 2014/07/16 17:57:09 I'm a bit confused here. I don't see any changes t
jamesr 2014/07/17 22:22:50 Right, and the service connector maintains a raw p
class ApplicationConnection {
public:
virtual ~ApplicationConnection();
- // Impl’s constructor will receive two arguments:
- // Impl::Impl(Application::Context* app_context,
- // ServiceContext* svc_context)
- template <typename Impl, typename ServiceContext>
- void AddService(ServiceContext* context) {
- AddServiceConnector(
- new internal::ServiceConnector<Impl, ServiceContext>(Impl::Name_,
- context));
- }
-
- // Impl’s constructor will receive one argument:
- // Impl::Impl(Application::Context* app_context)
- template <typename Impl>
- void AddService() {
+ template <typename Interface>
+ void AddServiceFactory(InterfaceFactory<Interface>* factory) {
AddServiceConnector(
- new internal::ServiceConnector<Impl, void>(Impl::Name_, NULL));
+ new internal::InterfaceFactoryConnector<Interface>(factory));
}
// Connect to the service implementing |Interface|.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698