| Index: test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
|
| diff --git a/test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js b/test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
|
| index c0b97e6ced14c90b57b5226e87a8e35352bf621f..f311f0de66d81d3a710297d35fac87cd41a206be 100644
|
| --- a/test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
|
| +++ b/test/mjsunit/const-redecl.js
|
| @@ -49,37 +49,6 @@ function TestLocal(s,e) {
|
| }
|
|
|
|
|
| -// NOTE: TestGlobal usually only tests the given string in the context
|
| -// of a global object in dictionary mode. This is because we use
|
| -// delete to get rid of any added properties.
|
| -function TestGlobal(s,e) {
|
| - // Collect the global properties before the call.
|
| - var properties = [];
|
| - for (var key in this) properties.push(key);
|
| - // Compute the result.
|
| - var result;
|
| - try {
|
| - var code = s + (e ? "; $$$result=" + e : "");
|
| - if (this.execScript) {
|
| - execScript(code);
|
| - } else {
|
| - this.eval(code);
|
| - }
|
| - // Avoid issues if $$$result is not defined by
|
| - // reading it through this.
|
| - result = this.$$$result;
|
| - } catch (x) {
|
| - result = CheckException(x);
|
| - }
|
| - // Get rid of any introduced global properties before
|
| - // returning the result.
|
| - for (var key in this) {
|
| - if (properties.indexOf(key) == -1) delete this[key];
|
| - }
|
| - return result;
|
| -}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| function TestContext(s,e) {
|
| try {
|
| // Use a with-statement to force the system to do dynamic
|
| @@ -98,8 +67,6 @@ function TestAll(expected,s,opt_e) {
|
| var msg = s;
|
| if (opt_e) { e = opt_e; msg += "; " + opt_e; }
|
| assertEquals(expected, TestLocal(s,e), "local:'" + msg + "'");
|
| - // Redeclarations of global consts do not throw, they are silently ignored.
|
| - assertEquals(42, TestGlobal(s, 42), "global:'" + msg + "'");
|
| assertEquals(expected, TestContext(s,e), "context:'" + msg + "'");
|
| }
|
|
|
| @@ -112,7 +79,7 @@ function TestConflict(def0, def1) {
|
| // Eval first definition.
|
| TestAll("TypeError", 'eval("' + def0 +'"); ' + def1);
|
| // Eval second definition.
|
| - TestAll("TypeError", def0 + '; eval("' + def1 + '")');
|
| + TestAll("TypeError", def0 + '; eval("' + def1 +'")');
|
| // Eval both definitions separately.
|
| TestAll("TypeError", 'eval("' + def0 +'"); eval("' + def1 + '")');
|
| }
|
| @@ -234,47 +201,26 @@ var undefined = 1; // Should be silently ignored.
|
| assertEquals(original_undef, undefined, "undefined got overwritten");
|
| undefined = original_undef;
|
|
|
| -var a; const a; const a = 1;
|
| -assertEquals(1, a, "a has wrong value");
|
| -a = 2;
|
| -assertEquals(2, a, "a should be writable");
|
| -
|
| -var b = 1; const b = 2;
|
| -assertEquals(2, b, "b has wrong value");
|
| -
|
| -var c = 1; const c = 2; const c = 3;
|
| -assertEquals(3, c, "c has wrong value");
|
| -
|
| -const d = 1; const d = 2;
|
| -assertEquals(1, d, "d has wrong value");
|
| -
|
| -const e = 1; var e = 2;
|
| +const e = 1; eval('var e = 2');
|
| assertEquals(1, e, "e has wrong value");
|
|
|
| -const f = 1; const f;
|
| -assertEquals(1, f, "f has wrong value");
|
| -
|
| -var g; const g = 1;
|
| -assertEquals(1, g, "g has wrong value");
|
| -g = 2;
|
| -assertEquals(2, g, "g should be writable");
|
| -
|
| -const h; var h = 1;
|
| -assertEquals(undefined,h, "h has wrong value");
|
| +const h; eval('var h = 1');
|
| +assertEquals(undefined, h, "h has wrong value");
|
|
|
| eval("Object.defineProperty(this, 'i', { writable: true });"
|
| + "const i = 7;"
|
| + "assertEquals(7, i, \"i has wrong value\");");
|
|
|
| var global = this;
|
| -assertThrows(function() {
|
| - Object.defineProperty(global, 'j', { writable: true })
|
| -}, TypeError);
|
| -const j = 2; // This is what makes the function above throw, because the
|
| -// const declaration gets hoisted and makes the property non-configurable.
|
| +Object.defineProperty(global, 'j', { value: 100, writable: true });
|
| +assertEquals(100, j);
|
| +// The const declaration stays configurable, so the declaration above goes
|
| +// through even though the const declaration is hoisted above.
|
| +const j = 2;
|
| assertEquals(2, j, "j has wrong value");
|
|
|
| -var k = 1; const k;
|
| -// You could argue about the expected result here. For now, the winning
|
| -// argument is that "const k;" is equivalent to "const k = undefined;".
|
| -assertEquals(undefined, k, "k has wrong value");
|
| +var k = 1;
|
| +try { eval('const k'); } catch(e) { }
|
| +assertEquals(1, k, "k has wrong value");
|
| +try { eval('const k = 10'); } catch(e) { }
|
| +assertEquals(1, k, "k has wrong value");
|
|
|