Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(4002)

Unified Diff: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc

Issue 377793003: Consider occluded tiles during eviction with occluded as Tile property. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Add TileManager unit test Created 6 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/resources/picture_layer_tiling.cc » ('j') | cc/resources/picture_layer_tiling.cc » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
index 2258655dbf6f678b4858290e86c6d30abbfed1d8..469d952f54048fbe984c55aadcbf61aa68ecc955 100644
--- a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
+++ b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc
@@ -2822,6 +2822,52 @@ class OcclusionTrackingPictureLayerImplTest : public PictureLayerImplTest {
public:
OcclusionTrackingPictureLayerImplTest()
: PictureLayerImplTest(OcclusionTrackingSettings()) {}
+
+ void VerifyEvictionConsidersOcclusion(PictureLayerImpl* layer,
+ size_t expected_occluded_tile_count[]) {
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 can this be size_t expected_occluded_tile_count[NU
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:31 Done.
+ for (int priority_count = 0; priority_count < 3; ++priority_count) {
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 can this 3 be NUM_TREE_PRIORITIES (and any other h
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:31 Done.
+ TreePriority tree_priority = static_cast<TreePriority>(priority_count);
+ size_t occluded_tile_count = 0u;
+ Tile* last_tile = NULL;
+
+ for (PictureLayerImpl::LayerEvictionTileIterator it =
+ PictureLayerImpl::LayerEvictionTileIterator(layer,
+ tree_priority);
+ it;
+ ++it) {
+ Tile* tile = *it;
+ if (!last_tile)
+ last_tile = tile;
+
+ // The only way we will encounter an occluded tile after an unoccluded
+ // tile is if the priorty bin decreased, the tile is required for
+ // activation, or the scale changed.
+ bool tile_is_occluded =
+ tile->is_occluded_for_tree_priority(tree_priority);
+ if (tile_is_occluded) {
+ occluded_tile_count++;
+
+ bool last_tile_is_occluded =
+ last_tile->is_occluded_for_tree_priority(tree_priority);
+ if (!last_tile_is_occluded) {
+ TilePriority::PriorityBin tile_priority_bin =
+ tile->priority_for_tree_priority(tree_priority).priority_bin;
+ TilePriority::PriorityBin last_tile_priority_bin =
+ last_tile->priority_for_tree_priority(tree_priority)
+ .priority_bin;
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(
+ (tile_priority_bin < last_tile_priority_bin) ||
+ tile->required_for_activation() ||
+ (tile->contents_scale() != last_tile->contents_scale()));
+ }
+ }
+ last_tile = tile;
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_tile_count[priority_count],
+ occluded_tile_count);
+ }
+ }
};
TEST_F(OcclusionTrackingPictureLayerImplTest,
@@ -3204,5 +3250,137 @@ TEST_F(OcclusionTrackingPictureLayerImplTest, DifferentOcclusionOnTrees) {
}
}
}
+
+TEST_F(OcclusionTrackingPictureLayerImplTest,
+ OccludedTilesConsideredDuringEviction) {
+ gfx::Size tile_size(102, 102);
+ gfx::Size layer_bounds(1000, 1000);
+ gfx::Size viewport_size(500, 500);
+ gfx::Point pending_occluding_layer_position(310, 0);
+ gfx::Point active_occluding_layer_position(0, 310);
+ gfx::Rect invalidation_rect(230, 230, 102, 102);
+
+ scoped_refptr<FakePicturePileImpl> pending_pile =
+ FakePicturePileImpl::CreateFilledPile(tile_size, layer_bounds);
+ scoped_refptr<FakePicturePileImpl> active_pile =
+ FakePicturePileImpl::CreateFilledPile(tile_size, layer_bounds);
+ SetupTrees(pending_pile, active_pile);
+
+ pending_layer_->set_fixed_tile_size(tile_size);
+ active_layer_->set_fixed_tile_size(tile_size);
+
+ float low_res_factor = host_impl_.settings().low_res_contents_scale_factor;
+
+ std::vector<PictureLayerTiling*> tilings;
+ tilings.push_back(pending_layer_->AddTiling(low_res_factor));
+ tilings.push_back(pending_layer_->AddTiling(0.3f));
+ tilings.push_back(pending_layer_->AddTiling(0.7f));
+ tilings.push_back(pending_layer_->AddTiling(1.0f));
+ tilings.push_back(pending_layer_->AddTiling(2.0f));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(5u, pending_layer_->num_tilings());
+ EXPECT_EQ(5u, active_layer_->num_tilings());
+
+ // Partially occlude the pending layer.
+ pending_layer_->AddChild(LayerImpl::Create(host_impl_.pending_tree(), 1));
+ LayerImpl* pending_occluding_layer = pending_layer_->children()[0];
+ pending_occluding_layer->SetBounds(layer_bounds);
+ pending_occluding_layer->SetContentBounds(layer_bounds);
+ pending_occluding_layer->SetDrawsContent(true);
+ pending_occluding_layer->SetContentsOpaque(true);
+ pending_occluding_layer->SetPosition(pending_occluding_layer_position);
+
+ // Partially occlude the active layer.
+ active_layer_->AddChild(LayerImpl::Create(host_impl_.active_tree(), 2));
+ LayerImpl* active_occluding_layer = active_layer_->children()[0];
+ active_occluding_layer->SetBounds(layer_bounds);
+ active_occluding_layer->SetContentBounds(layer_bounds);
+ active_occluding_layer->SetDrawsContent(true);
+ active_occluding_layer->SetContentsOpaque(true);
+ active_occluding_layer->SetPosition(active_occluding_layer_position);
+
+ // Partially invalidate the pending layer. Tiles inside the invalidation rect
+ // are not shared between trees.
+ pending_layer_->set_invalidation(invalidation_rect);
+
+ host_impl_.SetViewportSize(viewport_size);
+ host_impl_.active_tree()->UpdateDrawProperties();
+ host_impl_.pending_tree()->UpdateDrawProperties();
+
+ size_t expected_occluded_on_both_count[] = {9u, 1u, 1u, 1u, 1u};
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 Can you add a comment saying why there's 5 values
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:30 Done.
+ size_t expected_occluded_on_active_count[] = {30u, 5u, 4u, 2u, 2u};
+ size_t expected_occluded_on_pending_count[] = {30u, 5u, 4u, 2u, 2u};
+ size_t expected_occluded_sum[] = {13u, 43u, 43u};
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 And why there's 3 in this one, and what this is a
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:31 Done.
+
+ // Verify number of occluded tiles on the pending layer for each tiling.
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < pending_layer_->num_tilings(); ++i) {
+ PictureLayerTiling* tiling = pending_layer_->tilings()->tiling_at(i);
+ tiling->CreateAllTilesForTesting();
+
+ size_t occluded_on_pending_count = 0u;
+ size_t occluded_on_active_count = 0u;
+ size_t occluded_on_both_count = 0u;
+ for (PictureLayerTiling::CoverageIterator iter(
+ tiling,
+ pending_layer_->contents_scale_x(),
+ gfx::Rect(layer_bounds));
+ iter;
+ ++iter) {
+ Tile* tile = *iter;
+
+ if (tile->is_occluded(PENDING_TREE))
+ occluded_on_pending_count++;
+ if (tile->is_occluded(ACTIVE_TREE))
+ occluded_on_active_count++;
+ if (tile->is_occluded(PENDING_TREE) && tile->is_occluded(ACTIVE_TREE))
+ occluded_on_both_count++;
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_pending_count[i], occluded_on_pending_count);
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 can you add "<< i" to the end of each of these EXP
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:31 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_active_count[i], occluded_on_active_count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_both_count[i], occluded_on_both_count);
+ }
+
+ // Verify number of occluded tiles on the active layer for each tiling.
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < active_layer_->num_tilings(); ++i) {
+ PictureLayerTiling* tiling = active_layer_->tilings()->tiling_at(i);
+ tiling->CreateAllTilesForTesting();
+
+ size_t occluded_on_pending_count = 0u;
+ size_t occluded_on_active_count = 0u;
+ size_t occluded_on_both_count = 0u;
+ for (PictureLayerTiling::CoverageIterator iter(
+ tiling,
+ active_layer_->contents_scale_x(),
+ gfx::Rect(layer_bounds));
+ iter;
+ ++iter) {
+ Tile* tile = *iter;
+
+ if (tile->is_occluded(PENDING_TREE))
+ occluded_on_pending_count++;
+ if (tile->is_occluded(ACTIVE_TREE))
+ occluded_on_active_count++;
+ if (tile->is_occluded(PENDING_TREE) && tile->is_occluded(ACTIVE_TREE))
+ occluded_on_both_count++;
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_pending_count[i], occluded_on_pending_count);
danakj 2014/07/15 21:26:50 << i here also
jbedley 2014/07/16 16:09:31 Done.
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_active_count[i], occluded_on_active_count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_occluded_on_both_count[i], occluded_on_both_count);
+ }
+
+ std::vector<Tile*> all_tiles;
+ for (std::vector<PictureLayerTiling*>::iterator tiling_iterator =
+ tilings.begin();
+ tiling_iterator != tilings.end();
+ ++tiling_iterator) {
+ std::vector<Tile*> tiles = (*tiling_iterator)->AllTilesForTesting();
+ std::copy(tiles.begin(), tiles.end(), std::back_inserter(all_tiles));
+ }
+
+ host_impl_.tile_manager()->InitializeTilesWithResourcesForTesting(all_tiles);
+
+ VerifyEvictionConsidersOcclusion(pending_layer_, expected_occluded_sum);
+ VerifyEvictionConsidersOcclusion(active_layer_, expected_occluded_sum);
+}
} // namespace
} // namespace cc
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/resources/picture_layer_tiling.cc » ('j') | cc/resources/picture_layer_tiling.cc » ('J')

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698