[es6] implement Array.prototype.copyWithin()

test/mjsunit/harmony/array-copywithin.js

+// Copyright 2014 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// Flags: --harmony-arrays
+
+assertEquals(Array.prototype.copyWithin.length, 2);
+
+// works with two arguments
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 3));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 4, 5, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(1, 3));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 3, 4, 5, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(1, 2));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(2, 2));
+
+// works with three arguments
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 3, 4), [4, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(1, 3, 4), [1, 4, 3, 4, 5]);
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(1, 2, 4), [1, 3, 4, 4, 5]);
+
+// works with negative arguments
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, -2));
+assertArrayEquals([4, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, -2, -1));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 3, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-4, -3, -2));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 3, 4, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-4, -3, -1));
+assertArrayEquals([1, 3, 4, 5, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-4, -3));
+
+var args = (function () { return Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); }(1, 2, 3));
+var argsClass = Object.prototype.toString.call(args);
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3], args);
+Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(args, -2, 0);
+assertArrayEquals([1, 1, 2], args);
+assertArrayEquals(argsClass, Object.prototype.toString.call(args));
+
+// throws on null/undefined values
+assertThrows('Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(null, 0, 3);', TypeError);
+
+assertThrows('Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(undefined, 0, 3);', TypeError);
+
+// test with this value as string
+// FIXME: Should this throw?
+// assertThrows('Array.prototype.copyWithin.call("hello world", 0, 3);', TypeError);

[adamk, 2015/04/17 22:34:17]

This throws because the indices are not writable. You should be able to
construct a non-throwing case.

[caitp (gmail), 2015/04/17 22:36:50]

I think these tests are all wrong, since a target is not being passed in, I'm
gonna overhaul these. good catch (it's the "0" whose index is non-writable,
though, not the "hello world")

[caitp (gmail), 2015/04/18 04:50:30]

I apparently forgot how copyWithin() worked when I wrote that comment --- so
this should throw, but we have a bug which seemed to not be filed, so I filed it
https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4042

+
+// test with this value as number
+assertArrayEquals(new Number(34), Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(34, 0, 3));
+
+// test with this value as TypedArray
+var buffer = new ArrayBuffer(16);
+var int32View = new Int32Array(buffer);
+for (var i=0; i<int32View.length; i++) {
+  int32View[i] = i*2;
+}
+assertArrayEquals(new Int32Array([2, 4, 6, 6]), Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(int32View, 0, 1));
+
+// if arguments object is sloppy, copyWithin must move the arguments around
+function f(a, b, c, d, e) {
+  [].copyWithin.call(arguments, 1, 3);
+  return [a, b, c, d, e];
+}
+assertArrayEquals([1, 4, 5, 4, 5], f(1, 2, 3, 4, 5));
+
+// test with target > start on 2 arguments
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 1, 2], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(3, 0));
+
+// test with target > start on 3 arguments
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 1, 2], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(3, 0, 4));
+
+// test on array with holes
+var arr = new Array(6);
+for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i += 2) {
+  arr[i] = i;
+}
+assertArrayEquals([, 4, , , 4, , ], arr.copyWithin(0, 3));
+
+// test on fractional arguments
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0.2, 3.9));
+
+// test with -0
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-0, 3));
+
+// test with arguments more than this.length
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 7));
+
+// test with arguments less than -this.length
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-7, 0));
+
+// test with arguments equal to -this.length
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(-5, 0));
+
+// test on empty array
+assertArrayEquals([], [].copyWithin(0, 3));
+
+// test with target range being shorter than end - start
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(2, 1, 4));
+
+// test overlapping ranges
+arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
+arr.copyWithin(2, 1, 4);
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 2, 2, 3], arr.copyWithin(2, 1, 4));
+
+// check that delete is strict

[adamk, 2015/04/17 22:34:17]

Also want to check that Set() is strict (your original String case fails for
that reason, I suppose you could re-use it for this case but it's a little
obscure).

[caitp (gmail), 2015/04/18 04:50:30]

Done, with some various [[Extensible]]-related tests too

+arr = [1, , 3, , 4, 5];
+Object.freeze(arr);
+assertThrows('arr.copyWithin(2, 1, 4);', TypeError);
+
+// test with a proxy object
+var proxyObj = {
+  get: function(recipient, name) {
+    return recipient[name] + 2;
+  }
+};
+
+// FIXME: Support Proxies 

[adamk, 2015/04/17 22:34:17]

You can probably test this with our existing implementation, adding
--harmony-proxies.

[caitp (gmail), 2015/04/18 04:50:30]

IMO, better to just get rid of the test for now. eventually it will be necessary
to add proxy tests for all the standard lib stuff, if they are ever implemented
properly.

+// https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-proxy-constructor-function
+// var p = new Proxy([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], proxyObj);
+// assertArrayEquals(Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(p, 0, 3), [6, 7, , , 5]);
+
+// test if we throw in between
+arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
+Object.defineProperty(arr, 1, {
+  set: function () {
+    throw new Error("Boom!");
+  }
+});
+assertThrows('arr.copyWithin(1, 3);', Error);
+assertArrayEquals([1, undefined, 3, 4, 5], arr);
+
+// undefined as third argument
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 3, undefined));
+
+// test that this.length is called only once
+arr = {0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3, 3: 4, 4: 5};
+var count = 0;
+Object.defineProperty(arr, "length", {
+  get: function () {
+    count++;
+  }
+});
+Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(arr, 1, 3);
+assertEquals(1, count);
+
+count = 0;
+Array.prototype.copyWithin.call(arr, 1, 3, 4);
+assertEquals(1, count);
+
+var large = 10000;
+
+// test on a large array
+arr = new Array(large);
+assertArrayEquals(arr, arr.copyWithin(45, 900));
+
+// test on floating point numbers
+for (var i = 0; i < large; i++) {
+  arr[i] = Math.random();
+}
+arr.copyWithin(45, 900);
+
+// test on array of objects
+for (var i = 0; i < large; i++) {
+  arr[i] = { num: Math.random() };
+}
+arr.copyWithin(45, 900);
+
+// test array length remains same
+assertEquals(large, arr.length);
+
+// test null on third argument is handled correctly
+assertArrayEquals([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 3, null));
+
+// tamper the global Object prototype and test this works
+Object.prototype[2] = 1;
+assertArrayEquals([4, 5, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].copyWithin(0, 3));

[adamk, 2015/04/17 22:34:17]

I think this test is probably more interesting if you have a hole in this array.