Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(345)

Unified Diff: cc/resources/tile_manager.cc

Issue 366113002: cc: Do not cleanup tiles with raster tasks. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@master
Patch Set: reset priority on correct tree. Created 6 years, 5 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: cc/resources/tile_manager.cc
diff --git a/cc/resources/tile_manager.cc b/cc/resources/tile_manager.cc
index dab3f5562823f5eadbdac2e7d7488726dee14f14..f7ead20b5bdaa82d68f4f356750a538d24903bcc 100644
--- a/cc/resources/tile_manager.cc
+++ b/cc/resources/tile_manager.cc
@@ -389,9 +389,6 @@ TileManager::~TileManager() {
// our memory usage to drop to zero.
global_state_ = GlobalStateThatImpactsTilePriority();
- CleanUpReleasedTiles();
- DCHECK_EQ(0u, tiles_.size());
-
RasterTaskQueue empty;
rasterizer_->ScheduleTasks(&empty);
orphan_raster_tasks_.clear();
@@ -401,11 +398,16 @@ TileManager::~TileManager() {
rasterizer_->Shutdown();
rasterizer_->CheckForCompletedTasks();
+ FreeResourcesForReleasedTiles();
+ released_tiles_.clear();
vmpstr 2014/07/25 16:29:25 You should call CleanUp... here instead and dcheck
reveman 2014/07/25 17:00:55 The problem is that we can't have the DCHECK(prior
sohanjg 2014/07/26 09:36:01 Done.
+
DCHECK_EQ(0u, bytes_releasable_);
DCHECK_EQ(0u, resources_releasable_);
}
void TileManager::Release(Tile* tile) {
+ DCHECK(TilePriority() == tile->combined_priority());
+
prioritized_tiles_dirty_ = true;
released_tiles_.push_back(tile);
}
@@ -418,18 +420,29 @@ bool TileManager::ShouldForceTasksRequiredForActivationToComplete() const {
return global_state_.tree_priority != SMOOTHNESS_TAKES_PRIORITY;
}
-void TileManager::CleanUpReleasedTiles() {
+void TileManager::FreeResourcesForReleasedTiles() {
for (std::vector<Tile*>::iterator it = released_tiles_.begin();
it != released_tiles_.end();
++it) {
Tile* tile = *it;
- ManagedTileState& mts = tile->managed_state();
+ FreeResourcesForTile(tile);
+ }
+}
- for (int mode = 0; mode < NUM_RASTER_MODES; ++mode) {
- FreeResourceForTile(tile, static_cast<RasterMode>(mode));
- orphan_raster_tasks_.push_back(mts.tile_versions[mode].raster_task_);
+void TileManager::CleanUpReleasedTiles() {
+ // Ensure the prioritized set is rebuild.
+ DCHECK(prioritized_tiles_dirty_);
+
+ std::vector<Tile*>::iterator it = released_tiles_.begin();
+ while (it != released_tiles_.end()) {
+ Tile* tile = *it;
+
+ if (tile->HasRasterTask()) {
+ ++it;
+ continue;
}
+ DCHECK(!tile->HasResources());
DCHECK(tiles_.find(tile->id()) != tiles_.end());
tiles_.erase(tile->id());
@@ -442,15 +455,15 @@ void TileManager::CleanUpReleasedTiles() {
}
delete tile;
+ it = released_tiles_.erase(it);
}
-
- released_tiles_.clear();
}
void TileManager::UpdatePrioritizedTileSetIfNeeded() {
if (!prioritized_tiles_dirty_)
return;
+ FreeResourcesForReleasedTiles();
CleanUpReleasedTiles();
prioritized_tiles_.Clear();
@@ -484,6 +497,8 @@ void TileManager::DidFinishRunningTasks() {
return;
}
+ FreeResourcesForReleasedTiles();
+
resource_pool_->ReduceResourceUsage();
// We don't reserve memory for required-for-activation tiles during
@@ -1071,14 +1086,9 @@ void TileManager::OnRasterTaskCompleted(
RasterMode raster_mode,
const PicturePileImpl::Analysis& analysis,
bool was_canceled) {
- TileMap::iterator it = tiles_.find(tile_id);
- if (it == tiles_.end()) {
- ++update_visible_tiles_stats_.canceled_count;
- resource_pool_->ReleaseResource(resource.Pass());
- return;
- }
+ DCHECK(tiles_.find(tile_id) != tiles_.end());
- Tile* tile = it->second;
+ Tile* tile = tiles_[tile_id];
ManagedTileState& mts = tile->managed_state();
ManagedTileState::TileVersion& tile_version = mts.tile_versions[raster_mode];
DCHECK(tile_version.raster_task_);

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698