Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(779)

Unified Diff: ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc

Issue 358693004: Added touch event permutations test to touch_exploration_controller. (Closed) Base URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git@new_passthrough
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc
diff --git a/ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc b/ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc
index baf3a765f9253da85d91be1f6cd5a370945ee65f..ef6c37918ca21dcfc033542019578045aa4a48ec 100644
--- a/ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc
+++ b/ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller_unittest.cc
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "ui/aura/window.h"
#include "ui/events/event.h"
#include "ui/events/event_utils.h"
+#include "ui/events/test/events_test_utils.h"
#include "ui/gfx/geometry/point.h"
#include "ui/gl/gl_implementation.h"
#include "ui/gl/gl_surface.h"
@@ -948,4 +949,93 @@ TEST_F(TouchExplorationTest, Passthrough) {
EXPECT_TRUE(IsInNoFingersDownState());
}
+int Factorial(int n) {
dmazzoni 2014/06/26 18:16:43 Put this inside the "namespace {" at the top, so t
evy 2014/06/26 22:31:05 Done.
+ if (n <= 0)
+ return 0;
+ if (n == 1)
+ return 1;
+ if (n == 2)
+ return 2;
+ return n * Factorial(n - 1);
+}
+
+TEST_F(TouchExplorationTest, AllFingerPermutations) {
+ SwitchTouchExplorationMode(true);
+
+ // We will test all permutations of events from three different fingers
+ // to ensure that we return to NO_FINGERS_DOWN when fingers have been
+ // released.
+ ScopedVector<ui::TouchEvent> all_events;
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_PRESSED, gfx::Point(11, 12), 0, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_MOVED, gfx::Point(13, 14), 0, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_RELEASED, gfx::Point(15, 16), 0, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_PRESSED, gfx::Point(21, 22), 1, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_MOVED, gfx::Point(23, 24), 1, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_RELEASED, gfx::Point(25, 26), 1, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_PRESSED, gfx::Point(31, 32), 2, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_MOVED, gfx::Point(33, 34), 2, Now()));
+ all_events.push_back(
+ new TouchEvent(ui::ET_TOUCH_RELEASED, gfx::Point(35, 36), 2, Now()));
+
+ const int num_events = all_events.size();
+ const int num_permutations = Factorial(num_events);
+ std::vector<ui::TouchEvent*> queued_events;
+ ui::TouchEvent* next_dispatch;
+ int index;
dmazzoni 2014/06/26 18:16:43 Declare all of these variables inside the block sc
evy 2014/06/26 22:31:05 Done.
+ std::vector<bool> fingers_pressed(3, false);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < num_permutations; i++) {
+ queued_events = all_events.get();
+ for (int j = num_events - 1; j >= 0; j--) {
+ if (j == num_events - 1) {
+ index = (i / Factorial(num_events - 1));
dmazzoni 2014/06/26 18:16:43 This logic looks correct but inefficient. Calling
evy 2014/06/26 22:31:05 I'm not quite sure what you meant, but I did somet
+ } else if (j == 0){
+ index = 0;
+ } else {
+ index = ((i % Factorial(j + 1)) / Factorial(j));
+ }
+ next_dispatch = queued_events[index];
+ ASSERT_TRUE(next_dispatch != NULL);
+ EventTestApi test_dispatch(next_dispatch);
+ test_dispatch.set_time_stamp(Now());
+ generator_->Dispatch(next_dispatch);
+ queued_events.erase(queued_events.begin() + index);
+ // Note: it is possible to send a touched move event in the state
+ // SINGLE_TAP_RELEASED or TOUCH_EXPLORE_RELEASED
+ // because the events are not always generated in a sensical
+ // order. If there is a NOTREACHED() for touch moved hit in
dmazzoni 2014/06/26 18:16:43 We should probably change the NOTREACHED to a LOG(
evy 2014/06/26 22:31:05 The thing is, this should never happen when the us
dmazzoni 2014/06/27 07:25:16 What about if the user already has fingers down wh
evy 2014/06/27 16:33:37 Okay, a touch moved is now properly handled.
+ // InSingleTapOrTouchExploreReleased, that is fine here.
+
+ // Keep track of what fingers have been pressed, to release
+ // only those fingers at the end, so the check for being in
+ // no fingers down can be accurate.
+ if (next_dispatch->type() == ET_TOUCH_PRESSED) {
+ fingers_pressed[next_dispatch->touch_id()] = true;
+ } else if (next_dispatch->type() == ET_TOUCH_RELEASED) {
+ fingers_pressed[next_dispatch->touch_id()] = false;
+ }
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(queued_events.size(), 0u);
+
+ // Release fingers recorded as pressed.
+ for(int j = 0; j < int(fingers_pressed.size()); j++){
+ if (fingers_pressed[j] == true) {
+ generator_->ReleaseTouchId(j);
+ fingers_pressed[j] = false;
+ }
+ }
+ AdvanceSimulatedTimePastTapDelay();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(IsInNoFingersDownState());
+ ClearCapturedEvents();
+ }
+}
+
} // namespace ui
« no previous file with comments | « ui/chromeos/touch_exploration_controller.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698