Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(39)

Issue 350263002: Remove an unneccessary special case for the main resource from InspectorPageAgent (Closed)

Created:
6 years, 6 months ago by kbalazs
Modified:
6 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
vsevik, pfeldman
CC:
blink-reviews, caseq+blink_chromium.org, loislo+blink_chromium.org, eustas+blink_chromium.org, malch+blink_chromium.org, yurys+blink_chromium.org, lushnikov+blink_chromium.org, vsevik+blink_chromium.org, pfeldman+blink_chromium.org, paulirish+reviews_chromium.org, apavlov+blink_chromium.org, devtools-reviews_chromium.org, sergeyv+blink_chromium.org, aandrey+blink_chromium.org
Base URL:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink.git@master
Project:
blink
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Remove an unneccessary special case for the main resource from InspectorPageClient Miniature cleanup, the special case is not needed as the default: case handles main resources well: it returns early with false as resourceBuffer() is null. R=pfeldman@chromium.org Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=177032

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+0 lines, -2 lines) Patch
M Source/core/inspector/InspectorPageAgent.cpp View 1 chunk +0 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 11 (0 generated)
kbalazs
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-24 23:27:39 UTC) #1
pfeldman
Why would we want to rely upon this implicit fact? What if this behavior changes?
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-25 15:31:58 UTC) #2
kbalazs
On 2014/06/25 15:31:58, pfeldman wrote: > Why would we want to rely upon this implicit ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-25 15:43:57 UTC) #3
vsevik
> I need to remove this condition to make some tests pass when main resources ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-25 15:51:38 UTC) #4
kbalazs
On 2014/06/25 15:51:38, vsevik wrote: > > I need to remove this condition to make ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-25 16:59:05 UTC) #5
vsevik
This test is currently passing on the bots, are you making some change that breaks ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-26 16:23:13 UTC) #6
vsevik
The CQ bit was checked by vsevik@chromium.org
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-26 16:23:19 UTC) #7
commit-bot: I haz the power
CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/b.kelemen@samsung.com/350263002/1
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-26 16:24:55 UTC) #8
kbalazs
On 2014/06/26 16:23:13, vsevik wrote: > This test is currently passing on the bots, are ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-26 19:16:44 UTC) #9
commit-bot: I haz the power
FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1). The failing builders are: win_blink_rel on tryserver.blink ...
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-26 19:48:12 UTC) #10
commit-bot: I haz the power
6 years, 6 months ago (2014-06-27 00:54:34 UTC) #11
Message was sent while issue was closed.
Change committed as 177032

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698