Roll ANGLE DEPS for M37.

Roll ANGLE DEPS for M37.

Includes several fixes for WebGL tests, large arrays in shaders,
and regression on older nVidia drivers.

BUG=384420, 380353, 379799
Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=279179

[Jamie Madill, 2014-06-20 19:07:09]

PTAL. Ken, if the bots are happy, should we manually commit or request merge for
certain things? It would be good to get the roll in.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-06-20 19:16:05]

On 2014/06/20 19:07:09, Jamie Madill wrote:
> PTAL. Ken, if the bots are happy, should we manually commit or request merge
for
> certain things? It would be good to get the roll in.

Lots of bots are failing to compile this roll.

I think we're still before the M37 branch point, so I think it would be
appropriate to create an M37 branch in ANGLE off this revision and point M37 to
it once branched. Is that your question?

[Jamie Madill, 2014-06-20 19:19:57]

On 2014/06/20 19:16:05, Ken Russell wrote:
> On 2014/06/20 19:07:09, Jamie Madill wrote:
> > PTAL. Ken, if the bots are happy, should we manually commit or request merge
> for
> > certain things? It would be good to get the roll in.
> 
> Lots of bots are failing to compile this roll.
> 
> I think we're still before the M37 branch point, so I think it would be
> appropriate to create an M37 branch in ANGLE off this revision and point M37
to
> it once branched. Is that your question?

That sounds good, will take a look at fixing the compile errors.

[Shannon Woods, 2014-06-20 19:31:07]

On 2014/06/20 19:19:57, Jamie Madill wrote:
> On 2014/06/20 19:16:05, Ken Russell wrote:
> > On 2014/06/20 19:07:09, Jamie Madill wrote:
> > > PTAL. Ken, if the bots are happy, should we manually commit or request
merge
> > for
> > > certain things? It would be good to get the roll in.
> > 
> > Lots of bots are failing to compile this roll.
> > 
> > I think we're still before the M37 branch point, so I think it would be
> > appropriate to create an M37 branch in ANGLE off this revision and point M37
> to
> > it once branched. Is that your question?
> 
> That sounds good, will take a look at fixing the compile errors.

Clarification on process-- branches are now created in ANGLE automatically each
time Chromium branches, so we'd need to wait until after the branch point and
then merge any needed fixes to that branch after the fact.

[Jamie Madill, 2014-06-20 22:48:13]

PTAL. We should look at moving the gn file into ANGLE at some point.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-06-21 00:02:13]

Nice work. LGTM

[Jamie Madill, 2014-06-23 17:17:10]

On 2014/06/21 00:02:13, Ken Russell wrote:
> Nice work. LGTM

Thanks!

@sky, could you also take a look? Need your approval due to changes in
content/browser.

[sky, 2014-06-23 19:09:16]

LGTM

[Jamie Madill, 2014-06-23 19:14:25]

The CQ bit was checked by jmadill@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-23 19:15:43]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/jmadill@chromium.org/344203006/100001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-23 21:23:19]

Change committed as 279179