Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1158)

Unified Diff: Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp

Issue 342683002: Oilpan: Use weak processing to stop a closed RTCPeerConnection (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/blink/trunk
Patch Set: Fixed Created 6 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp
diff --git a/Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp b/Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp
index 9a0ec1b246913bb4ac02b0e4d0f6f5a6f4b241b1..af20afa5714ea2741889d1f89a3ceda295349beb 100644
--- a/Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp
+++ b/Source/modules/mediastream/RTCDataChannel.cpp
@@ -51,29 +51,32 @@ static void throwNoBlobSupportException(ExceptionState& exceptionState)
exceptionState.throwDOMException(NotSupportedError, "Blob support not implemented yet");
}
-PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<RTCDataChannel> RTCDataChannel::create(ExecutionContext* context, PassOwnPtr<blink::WebRTCDataChannelHandler> handler)
+PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<RTCDataChannel> RTCDataChannel::create(ExecutionContext* context, RTCPeerConnection* connection, PassOwnPtr<blink::WebRTCDataChannelHandler> handler)
{
ASSERT(handler);
- return adoptRefWillBeRefCountedGarbageCollected(new RTCDataChannel(context, handler));
+ return adoptRefWillBeRefCountedGarbageCollected(new RTCDataChannel(context, connection, handler));
}
-PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<RTCDataChannel> RTCDataChannel::create(ExecutionContext* context, blink::WebRTCPeerConnectionHandler* peerConnectionHandler, const String& label, const blink::WebRTCDataChannelInit& init, ExceptionState& exceptionState)
+PassRefPtrWillBeRawPtr<RTCDataChannel> RTCDataChannel::create(ExecutionContext* context, RTCPeerConnection* connection, blink::WebRTCPeerConnectionHandler* peerConnectionHandler, const String& label, const blink::WebRTCDataChannelInit& init, ExceptionState& exceptionState)
{
OwnPtr<blink::WebRTCDataChannelHandler> handler = adoptPtr(peerConnectionHandler->createDataChannel(label, init));
if (!handler) {
exceptionState.throwDOMException(NotSupportedError, "RTCDataChannel is not supported");
return nullptr;
}
- return adoptRefWillBeRefCountedGarbageCollected(new RTCDataChannel(context, handler.release()));
+ return adoptRefWillBeRefCountedGarbageCollected(new RTCDataChannel(context, connection, handler.release()));
}
-RTCDataChannel::RTCDataChannel(ExecutionContext* context, PassOwnPtr<blink::WebRTCDataChannelHandler> handler)
+RTCDataChannel::RTCDataChannel(ExecutionContext* context, RTCPeerConnection* connection, PassOwnPtr<blink::WebRTCDataChannelHandler> handler)
: m_executionContext(context)
, m_handler(handler)
, m_stopped(false)
, m_readyState(ReadyStateConnecting)
, m_binaryType(BinaryTypeArrayBuffer)
, m_scheduledEventTimer(this, &RTCDataChannel::scheduledEventTimerFired)
+#if ENABLE(OILPAN)
+ , m_connection(connection)
+#endif
{
ScriptWrappable::init(this);
m_handler->setClient(this);
@@ -81,6 +84,7 @@ RTCDataChannel::RTCDataChannel(ExecutionContext* context, PassOwnPtr<blink::WebR
RTCDataChannel::~RTCDataChannel()
{
+ m_handler->setClient(0);
Mads Ager (chromium) 2014/06/18 09:09:26 Do we need to guard this: if (!m_stopped) m_h
haraken 2014/06/18 09:17:08 Looks nicer.
keishi 2014/06/18 10:48:00 Done.
}
String RTCDataChannel::label() const
@@ -313,9 +317,21 @@ void RTCDataChannel::scheduledEventTimerFired(Timer<RTCDataChannel>*)
events.clear();
}
+#if ENABLE(OILPAN)
+void RTCDataChannel::clearWeakMembers(Visitor* visitor)
+{
+ if (!visitor->isAlive(m_connection))
+ stop();
+}
+#endif
+
void RTCDataChannel::trace(Visitor* visitor)
{
visitor->trace(m_scheduledEvents);
+#if ENABLE(OILPAN)
Mads Ager (chromium) 2014/06/18 09:09:26 Do you need this #if? If you do I would just put t
keishi 2014/06/18 10:48:00 Done. We need it because m_connection is oilpan on
+ visitor->trace(m_connection);
haraken 2014/06/18 09:17:08 You can remove this trace, and explicitly do 'm_co
Mads Ager (chromium) 2014/06/18 09:32:45 Auch, good catch Haraken! Actually you *have* to r
keishi 2014/06/18 10:48:00 Done.
+ visitor->registerWeakMembers<RTCDataChannel, &RTCDataChannel::clearWeakMembers>(this);
+#endif
EventTargetWithInlineData::trace(visitor);
}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698