Chromium Code Reviews| Index: Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp |
| diff --git a/Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp b/Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp |
| index 9da6d1bc717b6c2687451c6a1db43f858cdc1764..094fb606fce6fbf1b869d1760cf4c8720958d351 100644 |
| --- a/Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp |
| +++ b/Source/web/WebLocalFrameImpl.cpp |
| @@ -556,6 +556,7 @@ void WebLocalFrameImpl::setRemoteWebLayer(WebLayer* webLayer) |
| // FIXME: This should be moved to WebRemoteFrame. |
| ASSERT(frame()->deprecatedLocalOwner()); |
| frame()->deprecatedLocalOwner()->setNeedsCompositingUpdate(); |
| + frame()->ownerRenderer()->layer()->updateSelfPaintingLayer(); |
|
ojan
2014/06/13 21:29:09
Is the frame guaranteed to have a renderer at this
kenrb
2014/06/16 15:43:38
I was thinking yes, but now that you ask I am not
ojan
2014/06/17 16:42:11
Yeah, I'm not sure. You could put in an ASSERT(fra
|
| } |
| void WebLocalFrameImpl::setPermissionClient(WebPermissionClient* permissionClient) |