Index: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc |
diff --git a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc |
index d380cfecd2cc47904b37217eb0136513f6119fbd..6a196d33722ecd966a2b16ac131c66d00db8d7c9 100644 |
--- a/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc |
+++ b/cc/layers/picture_layer_impl_unittest.cc |
@@ -1648,8 +1648,8 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ActivateUninitializedLayer) { |
// by a sync from the active layer. This could happen because if the |
// pending layer has not been post-commit initialized it will attempt |
// to sync from the active layer. |
- bool default_lcd_text_setting = pending_layer_->is_using_lcd_text(); |
- pending_layer_->force_set_lcd_text(!default_lcd_text_setting); |
+ // bool default_lcd_text_setting = pending_layer_->is_using_lcd_text(); |
alokp
2014/06/06 22:37:40
enne: LCD text state is going away. Any suggestion
enne (OOO)
2014/06/09 22:58:39
Looking at SyncFromActiveLayer, maybe one of the r
|
+ // pending_layer_->force_set_lcd_text(!default_lcd_text_setting); |
EXPECT_TRUE(pending_layer_->needs_post_commit_initialization()); |
host_impl_.ActivatePendingTree(); |
@@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ TEST_F(PictureLayerImplTest, ActivateUninitializedLayer) { |
host_impl_.active_tree()->LayerById(id_)); |
EXPECT_EQ(0u, active_layer_->num_tilings()); |
- EXPECT_EQ(!default_lcd_text_setting, active_layer_->is_using_lcd_text()); |
+ // EXPECT_EQ(!default_lcd_text_setting, active_layer_->is_using_lcd_text()); |
EXPECT_FALSE(active_layer_->needs_post_commit_initialization()); |
} |