Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(4187)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc

Issue 3210007: Add support for a "split" incognito behavior for extensions. (Closed)
Patch Set: latest Created 10 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc
index cf2d5d97b9748307f2daeceb4e0a8891ae1956af..f73c0b015d8ac77983b389fc9abc8306a8c5f12e 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc
+++ b/chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager_unittest.cc
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ TEST_F(ExtensionProcessManagerTest, ProcessGrouping) {
// functionality. This means we can get away with a NULL UserScriptMaster.
TestingProfile profile1;
scoped_ptr<ExtensionProcessManager> manager1(
- new ExtensionProcessManager(&profile1));
+ ExtensionProcessManager::Create(&profile1));
TestingProfile profile2;
scoped_ptr<ExtensionProcessManager> manager2(
- new ExtensionProcessManager(&profile2));
+ ExtensionProcessManager::Create(&profile2));
// Extensions with common origins ("scheme://id/") should be grouped in the
// same SiteInstance.
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/browser/extensions/extension_process_manager.cc ('k') | chrome/browser/extensions/extension_protocols.cc » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698