Enable unified GR by default in Aura.

Enable unified GR by default in Aura.

BUG=332418
TEST=GestureRecognizerTest.*

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=275122

[tdresser, 2014-06-03 19:09:45]

Pending 
https://codereview.chromium.org/313473002/ and
https://codereview.chromium.org/309823002/

[tdresser, 2014-06-04 12:01:59]

All patches this depends on have landed.

[sadrul, 2014-06-04 12:35:07]

LGTM!!

[tdresser, 2014-06-04 12:35:30]

The CQ bit was checked by tdresser@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-04 12:37:05]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/tdresser@chromium.org/315713002/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-04 16:05:01]

FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1).
The failing builders are:
  linux_chromium_chromeos_rel on tryserver.chromium
(http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/linux_chromium_chrome...)
  linux_chromium_rel on tryserver.chromium
(http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/linux_chromium_rel/bu...)
  win_chromium_rel on tryserver.chromium
(http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/win_chromium_rel/buil...)

[tdresser, 2014-06-04 17:13:15]

The CQ bit was unchecked by tdresser@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-04 17:14:17]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-04 17:14:18]

Try jobs failed on following builders:
  linux_chromium_rel on tryserver.chromium
(http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/linux_chromium_rel/bu...)

[tdresser, 2014-06-04 19:28:35]

phajdan.jr@, can you take a look at the browser_test_utils change? It's just to
avoid hitting a DCHECK.

[Paweł Hajdan Jr., 2014-06-05 10:17:53]

LGTM with a comment

https://codereview.chromium.org/315713002/diff/20001/content/public/test/brow...
File content/public/test/browser_test_utils.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/315713002/diff/20001/content/public/test/brow...
content/public/test/browser_test_utils.cc:269:
touch.SetTimestamp(base::TimeTicks::Now() - base::TimeTicks());
nit: Could you add a comment why we do this weird TimeTicks - TimeTicks dance?

[tdresser, 2014-06-05 12:05:08]

https://codereview.chromium.org/315713002/diff/20001/content/public/test/brow...
File content/public/test/browser_test_utils.cc (right):

https://codereview.chromium.org/315713002/diff/20001/content/public/test/brow...
content/public/test/browser_test_utils.cc:269:
touch.SetTimestamp(base::TimeTicks::Now() - base::TimeTicks());
On 2014/06/05 10:17:53, Paweł Hajdan Jr. wrote:
> nit: Could you add a comment why we do this weird TimeTicks - TimeTicks dance?

Done.

[tdresser, 2014-06-05 12:05:13]

The CQ bit was checked by tdresser@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-05 12:06:57]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/tdresser@chromium.org/315713002/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-05 14:06:19]

FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1).
The failing builders are:
  linux_chromium_rel on tryserver.chromium
(http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium/builders/linux_chromium_rel/bu...)

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-06-05 15:05:48]

Change committed as 275122

[tdresser, 2014-06-05 19:16:23]

On 2014/06/05 15:05:48, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> Change committed as 275122

Reverted here:
https://codereview.chromium.org/312303003/