Initial ServiceWorker Cache API polyfill.

Source/modules/serviceworkers/polyfills/cachePolyfill.js

Index: Source/modules/serviceworkers/polyfills/cachePolyfill.js
diff --git a/Source/modules/serviceworkers/polyfills/cachePolyfill.js b/Source/modules/serviceworkers/polyfills/cachePolyfill.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..30c145279c4523c5724931a430c36a965a4fc9c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Source/modules/serviceworkers/polyfills/cachePolyfill.js
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+/*

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

Use new shorter license header:
http://dev.chromium.org/blink/coding-style#TOC-License

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:45]

Done.

+ * Copyright (C) 2014 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+ * met:
+ *
+ *     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+ * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+ *     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+ * copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+ * in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+ * distribution.
+ *     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+ * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+ * this software without specific prior written permission.
+ *
+ * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+ * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+ * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+ * A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+ * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+ * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+ * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+ * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+ * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+ * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+ * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+ */
+
+// A simple, incomplete implementation of the Cache API, intended to facilitate
+// end to end serviceworker testing.
+
+var Cache = (function () {

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

A good polyfill pattern is:

(function(global) {

  var Cache = ....;

  // Use native implementation if available.
  global.Cache = global.Cache || Cache;

}(self)); // window or worker global scope

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Thanks. I did this, and removed the scope for "var Cache = ...", since that was
really only around to keep things sanitary, and our anon function does that just
as well.

+    function _castToRequest(item) {
+        if (typeof item == "string") {
+            item = new Request({
+                url: item,
+                method: 'GET',

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

I notice that the Fetch polyfill doesn't explicitly set method; is it necessary?

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

It is not. Now fixed.

+            });
+        }
+        return item;
+    };
+
+    function Cache() {
+        // An object containing a property for each HTTP fetch method. Those
+        // referenced objects contain a property for each URL, which is the
+        // Response.
+        this.entriesByMethod = {};
+    };
+
+    Cache.prototype.keys = function() {
+        var entriesByMethod = this.entriesByMethod;

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

FYI, it's slightly more idiomatic JS to capture the 'this' object in the closure
rather than particular members, e.g. var that = this; ... that.entriesByMethods
- which defends against "whole brain swap" changes where this.entriesByMethods
itself gets reassigned.

But this is fine.

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:45]

Fair point; I should not have optimized out the property lookup, that is
something a compiler can do. Fixed.

+
+        return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

Nit: be consistent between function() and function ()

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Done.

+            var result = [];
+
+            for (var method in entriesByMethod) {

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

for... in is fragile and can break when interacting with user code E.g. if
someone adds Object.prototype.foo, it'll show up in the enumeration.

You can write:

for (var p in o) {
  if (!o.hasOwnProperty(p)) continue;
  ... o[p] ...
}

Or alternately:

Object.keys(o).forEach(function(p) {
  ... o[p] ...
});

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Thanks. I took the Object.keys() approach, and went a bit more functional using
Function.prototype.map().

+                for (var url in entriesByMethod[method]) {
+                    result.push(new Request({method: method, url: url}));
+                }
+            }
+
+            resolve(result);
+        });
+    };
+
+    Cache.prototype.set = function(request, response) {

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:45]

Called "put" in the latest revision of the spec.

+        request = _castToRequest(request);
+        var entriesByMethod = this.entriesByMethod;
+
+        return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
+            if (entriesByMethod[request.method] == undefined) {

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

Paranoia: use entriesByMethod.hasOwnProperty(request.method) instead

(Only slight paranoia; users could override Object.property.hasOwnProperty, and
while you can defend against that it's probably not worth it if we're not making
security decisions based on this code.)

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Done. I added a TODO at the top about binding function references, since that
probably should be done.

+                entriesByMethod[request.method] = {};
+            }
+
+            var entriesByUrl = entriesByMethod[request.method];
+            entriesByUrl[request.url] = response;
+
+            resolve();
+        });
+    };
+
+    Cache.prototype.add = function(request) {
+        // FIXME: Implement this.
+        return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

FYI, could just write: return Promise.reject("...");

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Done. Same thing in a few other places.

+            reject("Cache.add not implemented.");
+        });
+    };
+
+    Cache.prototype.delete = function(request) {
+        request = _castToRequest(request);
+
+        var entriesByMethod = this.entriesByMethod;
+        return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
+            var entriesByUrl = entriesByMethod[request.method];
+
+            if (entriesByUrl == undefined) {
+                reject("not found");

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

Need to `return` after this.

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:45]

Done.

+            }
+
+            delete entriesByUrl[request.url];
+            resolve();
+        });
+    };
+
+    Cache.prototype.match = function(request) {
+        request = _castToRequest(request);
+
+        var entriesByMethod = this.entriesByMethod;
+
+        return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
+            var entriesByUrl = entriesByMethod[request.method];

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

Again, may want to test with entriesByMethod.hasOwnProperty(request.method) for
paranoia's sake.

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Done.

+
+            if (entriesByUrl == undefined) {
+                reject("not found");

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:01]

Need to `return` after this.

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:44]

Done.

+            }
+
+            var entry = entriesByUrl[request.url];
+            if (entry == undefined) {
+                reject("not found");

[jsbell, 2014/06/05 18:06:00]

Need to `return` after this.

[gavinp, 2014/06/06 16:06:45]

Done.

+            }
+            resolve(entry);
+        });
+    };
+
+    return Cache;
+})();