OLD | NEW |
---|---|
1 /* | 1 /* |
2 * Copyright (C) 2008 Apple Inc. All Rights Reserved. | 2 * Copyright (C) 2008 Apple Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
3 * | 3 * |
4 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without | 4 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
5 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions | 5 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions |
6 * are met: | 6 * are met: |
7 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright | 7 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
8 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. | 8 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
9 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright | 9 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright |
10 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the | 10 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the |
(...skipping 18 matching lines...) Expand all Loading... | |
29 #include "core/dom/Node.h" | 29 #include "core/dom/Node.h" |
30 | 30 |
31 namespace WebCore { | 31 namespace WebCore { |
32 | 32 |
33 // For use when you want to get the index for a node repeatedly and | 33 // For use when you want to get the index for a node repeatedly and |
34 // only want to walk the child list to figure out the index once. | 34 // only want to walk the child list to figure out the index once. |
35 class NodeWithIndex { | 35 class NodeWithIndex { |
36 public: | 36 public: |
37 explicit NodeWithIndex(Node& node) | 37 explicit NodeWithIndex(Node& node) |
38 : m_node(node) | 38 : m_node(node) |
39 , m_haveIndex(false) | 39 , m_index(-1) |
eseidel
2014/06/02 05:14:10
Why was m_index not initialized before? I guess i
Inactive
2014/06/02 12:10:22
Yes, it wasn't because it did not need to be (acce
| |
40 { | 40 { |
41 } | 41 } |
42 | 42 |
43 Node& node() const { return m_node; } | 43 Node& node() const { return m_node; } |
44 | 44 |
45 int index() const | 45 int index() const |
46 { | 46 { |
47 if (!m_haveIndex) { | 47 if (!hasIndex()) |
48 m_index = m_node.nodeIndex(); | 48 m_index = m_node.nodeIndex(); |
eseidel
2014/06/02 05:14:42
Can this ever return negative?
Jeffrey Yasskin
2014/06/02 06:06:16
It would be good to ASSERT that hasIndex() after t
Inactive
2014/06/02 12:10:22
No it cannot, this is why my change is safe. As ex
Inactive
2014/06/02 12:10:22
Makes sense, will do.
Inactive
2014/06/02 12:12:20
Done.
| |
49 m_haveIndex = true; | |
50 } | |
51 ASSERT(m_index == static_cast<int>(m_node.nodeIndex())); | 49 ASSERT(m_index == static_cast<int>(m_node.nodeIndex())); |
52 return m_index; | 50 return m_index; |
53 } | 51 } |
54 | 52 |
55 private: | 53 private: |
54 bool hasIndex() const { return m_index >= 0; } | |
55 | |
56 Node& m_node; | 56 Node& m_node; |
57 mutable bool m_haveIndex; | |
58 mutable int m_index; | 57 mutable int m_index; |
59 }; | 58 }; |
60 | 59 |
61 } | 60 } |
62 | 61 |
63 #endif | 62 #endif |
OLD | NEW |