make new blurrect GM and replace the dozens of existing ones

make new blurrect GM and replace the dozens of existing ones

BUG=
NOTRY=True

Committed: http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=14940

[humper, 2014-05-28 21:01:08]

ptal -- one blurrect to rule them all

[reed1, 2014-05-28 21:07:45]

lgtm

[humper, 2014-05-28 21:08:08]

The CQ bit was checked by humper@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 21:08:29]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/humper@google.com/306583007/20001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 21:15:10]

FYI, CQ is re-trying this CL (attempt #1).
The failing builders are:
  Build-Mac10.8-Clang-x86-Release-Trybot on tryserver.chromium
(http://108.170.220.76:10117/builders/Build-Mac10.8-Clang-x86-Release-Trybot/b...)
  Build-Ubuntu13.10-GCC4.8-x86_64-Release-Trybot on tryserver.chromium
(http://108.170.220.76:10117/builders/Build-Ubuntu13.10-GCC4.8-x86_64-Release-...)

[humper, 2014-05-28 21:16:37]

The CQ bit was checked by humper@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 21:16:53]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/humper@google.com/306583007/40001

[epoger, 2014-05-28 21:25:48]

The CQ bit was unchecked by epoger@google.com

[epoger, 2014-05-28 21:28:39]

I unchecked the commit box, because I'm worried about how hard it is going to be
to commit expectations for these new tests due to http://skbug.com/2618 ('The
Case of the Missing Mandrills')

But maybe it's fine... after all, the bots won't complain, given that there are
no expectations at all for these new tests.  And we can just wait until the
Missing Mandrills problem is fixed, and then you can commit the new results as
expectations.

Please feel free to re-check the commit box (maybe setting NOTRY=True first
since you already passed the trybots) if you are comfortable committing this in
the current environment.  I think it's OK, just wanted to make sure you
considered it.

[humper, 2014-05-28 21:34:20]

On 2014/05/28 21:28:39, epoger wrote:
> I unchecked the commit box, because I'm worried about how hard it is going to
be
> to commit expectations for these new tests due to http://skbug.com/2618 ('The
> Case of the Missing Mandrills')
> 
> But maybe it's fine... after all, the bots won't complain, given that there
are
> no expectations at all for these new tests.  And we can just wait until the
> Missing Mandrills problem is fixed, and then you can commit the new results as
> expectations.
> 
> Please feel free to re-check the commit box (maybe setting NOTRY=True first
> since you already passed the trybots) if you are comfortable committing this
in
> the current environment.  I think it's OK, just wanted to make sure you
> considered it.

Yep, I was planning to baseline tomorrow once things settle down.  Thanks
for being cautious, though.  You da sherrif now, dog.

[humper, 2014-05-28 21:51:51]

The CQ bit was checked by humper@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 21:52:07]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://skia-tree-status.appspot.com/cq/humper@google.com/306583007/40001

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 21:52:14]

Change committed as 14940