Use --ignore-certificate-errors for webview

Use --ignore-certificate-errors for webview

BUG=chromium:753948
Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/3012143003
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult/+/aca6ca9eacf53d6d12f599ba6b9011951fde2017

[nednguyen, 2017-09-11 15:54:50]

nednguyen@google.com changed reviewers:
+ perezju@chromium.org, xunjieli@chromium.org

[nednguyen, 2017-09-11 15:54:55]

The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com to run a CQ dry run

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-09-11 15:55:05]

Dry run: CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[xunjieli, 2017-09-11 15:59:41]

LGTM. Thanks, Ned!

It will be nice if we have some CQ coverage of WebView perf tests.

[nednguyen, 2017-09-11 16:00:51]

On 2017/09/11 15:59:41, xunjieli wrote:
> LGTM. Thanks, Ned!
> 
> It will be nice if we have some CQ coverage of WebView perf tests.

I totally agree. Juan: do you have any insights why we don't have
telemetry_perf_unittests on webview on chromium CQ?

[perezju, 2017-09-11 16:09:58]

lgtm

Finally managed to test this on Monochrome on Android N and seems to fix the
issue (confirmed fails on catapult master, and works with this CL applied).

Couldn't manage to test SystemWebview on Android M, like the bots run, since I
don't seem to have the right kind of device; but hopefully this should work
there too.

On 2017/09/11 16:00:51, nednguyen wrote:
> On 2017/09/11 15:59:41, xunjieli wrote:
> > LGTM. Thanks, Ned!
> > 
> > It will be nice if we have some CQ coverage of WebView perf tests.
> 
> I totally agree. Juan: do you have any insights why we don't have
> telemetry_perf_unittests on webview on chromium CQ?

No idea. +jbudorick, any comments on that?

[nednguyen, 2017-09-11 16:14:41]

The CQ bit was unchecked by nednguyen@google.com

[nednguyen, 2017-09-11 16:14:45]

The CQ bit was checked by nednguyen@google.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-09-11 16:14:59]

CQ is trying da patch.

Follow status at:
https://chromium-cq-status.appspot.com/v2/patch-status/codereview.chromium.or...

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-09-11 16:56:49]

CQ is committing da patch.

Bot data: {"patchset_id": 1, "attempt_start_ts": 1505146485350540, "parent_rev":
"0ed6f7d08a9122b7bf9169a57ad3c81b55583909", "commit_rev":
"aca6ca9eacf53d6d12f599ba6b9011951fde2017"}

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-09-11 16:56:52]

Description was changed from

==========
Use --ignore-certificate-errors for webview

BUG=chromium:753948
==========

to

==========
Use --ignore-certificate-errors for webview

BUG=chromium:753948

Review-Url: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/3012143003
Committed:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapu...
==========

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2017-09-11 16:56:54]

Committed patchset #1 (id:1) as
https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapu...

[xunjieli, 2017-09-11 17:04:31]

On 2017/09/11 16:09:58, perezju wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> Finally managed to test this on Monochrome on Android N and seems to fix the
> issue (confirmed fails on catapult master, and works with this CL applied).
> 
> Couldn't manage to test SystemWebview on Android M, like the bots run, since I
> don't seem to have the right kind of device; but hopefully this should work
> there too.
> 
> On 2017/09/11 16:00:51, nednguyen wrote:
> > On 2017/09/11 15:59:41, xunjieli wrote:
> > > LGTM. Thanks, Ned!
> > > 
> > > It will be nice if we have some CQ coverage of WebView perf tests.
> > 
> > I totally agree. Juan: do you have any insights why we don't have
> > telemetry_perf_unittests on webview on chromium CQ?
> 
> No idea. +jbudorick, any comments on that?

I filed https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=763974 for the
question on CQ coverage.

[jbudorick, 2017-09-11 19:09:35]

On 2017/09/11 16:09:58, perezju wrote:
> lgtm
> 
> Finally managed to test this on Monochrome on Android N and seems to fix the
> issue (confirmed fails on catapult master, and works with this CL applied).
> 
> Couldn't manage to test SystemWebview on Android M, like the bots run, since I
> don't seem to have the right kind of device; but hopefully this should work
> there too.
> 
> On 2017/09/11 16:00:51, nednguyen wrote:
> > On 2017/09/11 15:59:41, xunjieli wrote:
> > > LGTM. Thanks, Ned!
> > > 
> > > It will be nice if we have some CQ coverage of WebView perf tests.
> > 
> > I totally agree. Juan: do you have any insights why we don't have
> > telemetry_perf_unittests on webview on chromium CQ?
> 
> No idea. +jbudorick, any comments on that?

I don't know of any particular reason.