Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(900)

Unified Diff: src/IceCfg.cpp

Issue 300563003: Subzero: Initial O2 lowering (Closed) Base URL: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/p/native_client/pnacl-subzero.git@master
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « src/IceCfg.h ('k') | src/IceCfgNode.h » ('j') | src/IceCfgNode.cpp » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/IceCfg.cpp
diff --git a/src/IceCfg.cpp b/src/IceCfg.cpp
index 3d720fa2249870369c46383ad0c9d508cce45496..90c897d1c86d6fccce00206aaedcfa4e20746e50 100644
--- a/src/IceCfg.cpp
+++ b/src/IceCfg.cpp
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include "IceCfgNode.h"
#include "IceDefs.h"
#include "IceInst.h"
+#include "IceLiveness.h"
#include "IceOperand.h"
#include "IceTargetLowering.h"
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ namespace Ice {
Cfg::Cfg(GlobalContext *Ctx)
: Ctx(Ctx), FunctionName(""), ReturnType(IceType_void),
IsInternalLinkage(false), HasError(false), ErrorMessage(""), Entry(NULL),
- NextInstNumber(1),
+ NextInstNumber(1), Live(NULL),
Target(TargetLowering::createLowering(Ctx->getTargetArch(), this)),
CurrentNode(NULL) {}
@@ -89,6 +90,13 @@ void Cfg::computePredecessors() {
}
}
+void Cfg::renumberInstructions() {
+ NextInstNumber = 1;
+ for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ (*I)->renumberInstructions();
+ }
+}
+
// placePhiLoads() must be called before placePhiStores().
void Cfg::placePhiLoads() {
for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
@@ -109,6 +117,12 @@ void Cfg::deletePhis() {
}
}
+void Cfg::doAddressOpt() {
+ for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ (*I)->doAddressOpt();
+ }
+}
+
void Cfg::genCode() {
for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
(*I)->genCode();
@@ -128,6 +142,145 @@ void Cfg::genFrame() {
}
}
+void Cfg::liveness(LivenessMode Mode) {
+ if (Mode == Liveness_LREndLightweight) {
+ // Lightweight liveness is a quick single pass and doesn't need to
+ // iterate until convergence.
+ for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ (*I)->liveness(Mode, getLiveness());
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 Can't getLiveness() return a nullptr here?
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Yes, but as it turns out, the "lightweight" mode d
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
+ Live.reset(new Liveness(this, Mode));
+ Live->init();
+ llvm::BitVector NeedToProcess(Nodes.size());
+ // Mark all nodes as needing to be processed.
+ for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ NeedToProcess[(*I)->getIndex()] = true;
+ }
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 Can you set the entire bit vector to true? If all
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Done (via the constructor). That loop-based initi
+ while (NeedToProcess.any()) {
+ // Iterate in reverse topological order to speed up convergence.
+ for (NodeList::reverse_iterator I = Nodes.rbegin(), E = Nodes.rend();
+ I != E; ++I) {
+ CfgNode *Node = *I;
+ if (NeedToProcess[Node->getIndex()]) {
+ NeedToProcess[Node->getIndex()] = false;
+ bool Changed = Node->liveness(Mode, getLiveness());
+ if (Changed) {
+ // If the beginning-of-block liveness changed since the last
+ // iteration, mark all in-edges as needing to be processed.
+ const NodeList &InEdges = Node->getInEdges();
+ for (NodeList::const_iterator I1 = InEdges.begin(),
+ E1 = InEdges.end();
+ I1 != E1; ++I1) {
+ CfgNode *Pred = *I1;
+ NeedToProcess[Pred->getIndex()] = true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if (Mode == Liveness_RangesFull) {
+ // Reset each variable's live range.
+ for (VarList::const_iterator I = Variables.begin(), E = Variables.end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
+ if (Variable *Var = *I)
+ Var->resetLiveRange();
+ }
+ }
+ Timer T_liveRange;
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 Why just time this part?
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Added a comment to explain. Basically, I want a b
+ // Make a final pass over instructions to delete dead instructions
+ // and build each Variable's live range.
+ for (NodeList::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ (*I)->livenessPostprocess(Mode, getLiveness());
+ }
+ if (Mode == Liveness_RangesFull) {
+ // Special treatment for live in-args. Their liveness needs to
+ // extend beyond the beginning of the function, otherwise an arg
+ // whose only use is in the first instruction will end up having
+ // the trivial live range [1,1) and will *not* interfere with
+ // other arguments. So if the first instruction of the method is
+ // "r=arg1+arg2", both args may be assigned the same register.
+ for (SizeT I = 0; I < Args.size(); ++I) {
+ Variable *Arg = Args[I];
+ if (!Live->getLiveRange(Arg).isEmpty()) {
+ // Add live range [-1,0) with weight 0.
+ Live->addLiveRange(Arg, -1, 0, 0);
+ }
+ Variable *Lo = Arg->getLo();
+ if (Lo && !Live->getLiveRange(Lo).isEmpty())
+ Live->addLiveRange(Lo, -1, 0, 0);
+ Variable *Hi = Arg->getHi();
+ if (Hi && !Live->getLiveRange(Hi).isEmpty())
+ Live->addLiveRange(Hi, -1, 0, 0);
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 What's this lo/hi thing?
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Added a comment explaining. BTW, there's a TODO i
+ }
+ // Copy Liveness::LiveRanges into individual variables. TODO:
+ // Remove Variable::LiveRange and redirect to
+ // Liveness::LiveRanges. TODO: make sure Variable weights
+ // are applied properly.
+ SizeT NumVars = Variables.size();
+ for (SizeT i = 0; i < NumVars; ++i) {
+ Variable *Var = Variables[i];
+ Var->setLiveRange(Live->getLiveRange(Var));
+ if (Var->getWeight().isInf())
+ Var->setLiveRangeInfiniteWeight();
+ setCurrentNode(NULL);
+ }
+ T_liveRange.printElapsedUs(getContext(), "live range construction");
+ dump();
jvoung (off chromium) 2014/05/28 17:48:15 If ctx->isVerbose, then dump() to avoid iterating
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Good idea. dump() now takes an optional intro mes
+ // TODO: validateLiveness() is a heavyweight operation inside an
+ // assert(). In a Release build with asserts enabled, we may want
+ // to disable this call.
+ assert(validateLiveness());
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 Could you validate passes after the pass instead?
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Removed the liveness validation from liveness(), a
+ }
+}
+
+// Traverse every Variable of every Inst and verify that it
+// appears within the Variable's computed live range.
+bool Cfg::validateLiveness() const {
+ bool Valid = true;
+ for (NodeList::const_iterator I1 = Nodes.begin(), E1 = Nodes.end(); I1 != E1;
+ ++I1) {
+ CfgNode *Node = *I1;
+ InstList &Insts = Node->getInsts();
+ for (InstList::const_iterator I2 = Insts.begin(), E2 = Insts.end();
+ I2 != E2; ++I2) {
+ Inst *Inst = *I2;
+ if (Inst->isDeleted())
+ continue;
+ if (llvm::isa<InstFakeKill>(Inst))
+ continue;
+ int32_t InstNumber = Inst->getNumber();
+ Variable *Dest = Inst->getDest();
+ if (Dest) {
+ // TODO: This instruction should actually begin Dest's live
+ // range, so we could probably test that this instruction is
+ // the beginning of some segment of Dest's live range. But
+ // this wouldn't work with non-SSA temporaries during
+ // lowering.
+ if (!Dest->getLiveRange().containsValue(InstNumber)) {
+ Valid = false;
+ assert(Valid);
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 i'm confused by this. Do you want to print the inv
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Done.
+ }
+ }
+ SizeT VarIndex = 0;
jvoung (off chromium) 2014/05/28 17:48:15 VarIndex unused (just incremented)?
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 This iterator pattern is copied in several places.
+ for (SizeT I = 0; I < Inst->getSrcSize(); ++I) {
+ Operand *Src = Inst->getSrc(I);
+ SizeT NumVars = Src->getNumVars();
+ for (SizeT J = 0; J < NumVars; ++J, ++VarIndex) {
+ const Variable *Var = Src->getVar(J);
+ if (!Var->getLiveRange().containsValue(InstNumber)) {
+ Valid = false;
+ assert(Valid);
JF 2014/05/25 22:50:50 Ditto.
Jim Stichnoth 2014/05/29 01:39:46 Done.
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return Valid;
+}
+
// ======================== Dump routines ======================== //
void Cfg::emit() {
@@ -176,6 +329,18 @@ void Cfg::dump() {
Str << ") {\n";
}
setCurrentNode(NULL);
+ if (getContext()->isVerbose(IceV_Liveness)) {
+ // Print summary info about variables
+ for (VarList::const_iterator I = Variables.begin(), E = Variables.end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
+ Variable *Var = *I;
+ Str << "//"
+ << " multiblock=" << Var->isMultiblockLife() << " "
+ << " weight=" << Var->getWeight() << " ";
+ Var->dump(this);
+ Str << " LIVE=" << Var->getLiveRange() << "\n";
+ }
+ }
// Print each basic block
for (NodeList::const_iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E;
++I) {
« no previous file with comments | « src/IceCfg.h ('k') | src/IceCfgNode.h » ('j') | src/IceCfgNode.cpp » ('J')

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698