Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(410)

Unified Diff: tests/language_2/if_null_assignment_static_test.dart

Issue 3003933002: Migrate block 116. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 4 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: tests/language_2/if_null_assignment_static_test.dart
diff --git a/tests/language_2/if_null_assignment_static_test.dart b/tests/language_2/if_null_assignment_static_test.dart
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3683367818a3bcbf1126592ad1c6187a616fe02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/language_2/if_null_assignment_static_test.dart
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file
+// for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a
+// BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// Verify that the static type of a ??= b is the least upper bound of the
+// static types of a and b.
+
+import "package:expect/expect.dart";
+
+bad() {
+ Expect.fail('Should not be executed');
+}
+
+/// Actually of type B so that the implicit downcasts below succeed at runtime.
+A theA = new B();
+B theB = new B();
+
+class A {
+ String a;
+}
+
+class B extends A {
+ String b;
+}
+
+class C extends A {
+ String c;
+}
+
+A get a => null;
+
+void set a(A value) {}
+
+B get b => null;
+
+void set b(B value) {}
+
+class ClassWithStaticGetters {
+ static A get a => null;
+
+ static void set a(A value) {}
+
+ static B get b => null;
+
+ static void set b(B value) {}
+}
+
+class ClassWithInstanceGetters {
+ A get a => null;
+
+ void set a(A value) {}
+
+ B get b => null;
+
+ void set b(B value) {}
+}
+
+class DerivedClass extends ClassWithInstanceGetters {
+ A get a => bad();
+
+ void set a(A value) {
+ bad();
+ }
+
+ B get b => bad();
+
+ void set b(B value) {
+ bad();
+ }
+
+ void derivedTest() {
+ // The static type of super.v ??= e is the LUB of the static types of
+ // super.v and e.
+ (super.a ??= theA).a; //# 01: ok
+ (super.a ??= theA).b; //# 02: compile-time error
+ (super.a ??= theB).a; //# 03: ok
+ (super.a ??= theB).b; //# 04: compile-time error
+ (super.b ??= theA).a; //# 05: ok
+ (super.b ??= theA).b; //# 06: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by super.v = e
+ // are also generated in the case of super.v ??= e.
+ super.b ??= new C(); //# 07: compile-time error
+ }
+}
+
+main() {
+ new DerivedClass().derivedTest();
+
+ // The static type of v ??= e is the LUB of the static types of v and e.
+ (a ??= theA).a; //# 08: ok
+ (a ??= theA).b; //# 09: compile-time error
+ (a ??= theB).a; //# 10: ok
+ (a ??= theB).b; //# 11: compile-time error
+ (b ??= theA).a; //# 12: ok
+ (b ??= theA).b; //# 13: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by v = e are also
+ // generated in the case of v ??= e.
+ b ??= new C(); //# 14: compile-time error
+
+ // The static type of C.v ??= e is the LUB of the static types of C.v and e.
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.a ??= theA).a; //# 15: ok
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.a ??= theA).b; //# 16: compile-time error
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.a ??= theB).a; //# 17: ok
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.a ??= theB).b; //# 18: compile-time error
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.b ??= theA).a; //# 19: ok
+ (ClassWithStaticGetters.b ??= theA).b; //# 20: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by C.v = e are
+ // also generated in the case of C.v ??= e.
+ ClassWithStaticGetters.b ??= new C(); //# 21: compile-time error
+
+ // The static type of e1.v ??= e2 is the LUB of the static types of e1.v and
+ // e2.
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().a ??= theA).a; //# 22: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().a ??= theA).b; //# 23: compile-time error
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().a ??= theB).a; //# 24: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().a ??= theB).b; //# 25: compile-time error
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().b ??= theA).a; //# 26: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters().b ??= theA).b; //# 27: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by e1.v = e2 are
+ // also generated in the case of e1.v ??= e2.
+ new ClassWithInstanceGetters().b ??= new C(); //# 28: compile-time error
+
+ // The static type of e1[e2] ??= e3 is the LUB of the static types of e1[e2]
+ // and e3.
+ ((<A>[null])[0] ??= theA).a; //# 29: ok
+ ((<A>[null])[0] ??= theA).b; //# 30: compile-time error
+ ((<A>[null])[0] ??= theB).a; //# 31: ok
+ ((<A>[null])[0] ??= theB).b; //# 32: compile-time error
+ ((<B>[null])[0] ??= theA).a; //# 33: ok
+ ((<B>[null])[0] ??= theA).b; //# 34: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by e1[e2] = e3 are
+ // also generated in the case of e1[e2] ??= e3.
+ (<B>[null])[0] ??= new C(); //# 35: compile-time error
+
+ // The static type of e1?.v op= e2 is the static type of e1.v op e2,
+ // therefore the static type of e1?.v ??= e2 is the static type of
+ // e1.v ?? e2, which is the LUB of the static types of e1?.v and e2.
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.a ??= theA).a; //# 36: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.a ??= theA).b; //# 37: compile-time error
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.a ??= theB).a; //# 38: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.a ??= theB).b; //# 39: compile-time error
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.b ??= theA).a; //# 40: ok
+ (new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.b ??= theA).b; //# 41: compile-time error
+
+ // Exactly the same static errors that would be caused by e1.v ??= e2 are
+ // also generated in the case of e1?.v ??= e2.
+ new ClassWithInstanceGetters()?.b ??= new C(); //# 42: compile-time error
+}

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698