Issue 300014: Reliablity test...

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue

Issue 300014: Reliablity test... (Closed)

Created:
11 years, 2 months ago by Nirnimesh

Modified:
9 years, 7 months ago

Reviewers:
huanr, Allen

CC:
chromium-reviews_googlegroups.com, tim (not reviewing), Paweł Hajdan Jr.

Base URL:
svn://chrome-svn/chrome/trunk/src/

Visibility:
Public.

Description

Reliablity test Introduce a flag --noclearprofile to instruct reliability test to not clear profile before firing off the browser. This is so avoid unnecessary disk writes. (The default value of this flag is OFF, so win reliability bot should continue to behave as is). Mac Chromebot would fire several instances of Chrome at a time, and I want to minimize the load it generates. I understand that I should begin with a clean profile, so I clean-up the user-data-dir after every few runs, rather than cleaning every single time. BUG=25271 TEST=reliability_tests should work as is on Win

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : '' #

Created: 11 years, 2 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+7 lines, -0 lines)			Patch
	M	chrome/test/reliability/page_load_test.cc	View	1	5 chunks	+7 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 2 (0 generated)

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages

Allen

LGTM Just wondering, how much does this impact your throughput?

11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-21 00:59:20 UTC) #1

Nirnimesh

11 years, 2 months ago (2009-10-21 01:01:57 UTC) #2

On 2009/10/21 00:59:20, Allen wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> Just wondering, how much does this impact your throughput?

Not a lot when I run continuous URLs without firing off the browser each time,
but significantly if I do. I see disk usage ~10 MB/s with 15 parallel instances
all loading one url.

Expand Messages | Collapse Messages