Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(1958)

Unified Diff: cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier_unittest.cc

Issue 296043005: cc: Add UniqueNotifier to cc/base. (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: update Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier.cc ('k') | cc/base/unique_notifier.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier_unittest.cc
diff --git a/cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier_unittest.cc b/cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04a0e01bdbe20d3d20c86bc7102fc0fd6e9e4662
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/bind_helpers.h"
+#include "base/message_loop/message_loop_proxy.h"
+#include "base/run_loop.h"
+#include "base/single_thread_task_runner.h"
+#include "cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace cc {
+namespace {
+
+class DelayedUniqueNotifierTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+ DelayedUniqueNotifierTest() : notification_count_(0) {}
+
+ virtual void SetUp() OVERRIDE {
+ notification_count_ = 0;
+ last_notification_time_ = base::TimeTicks();
+ }
+
+ void Notify() {
+ ++notification_count_;
+ last_notification_time_ = base::TimeTicks::Now();
+ }
+
+ int NotificationCount() const { return notification_count_; }
+
+ base::TimeTicks LastNotificationTime() const {
+ return last_notification_time_;
+ }
+
+ void RunForTime(base::TimeDelta delay) {
vmpstr 2014/05/27 18:14:59 Note that base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle() doesn't s
reveman 2014/05/27 19:02:17 How about changing Notify() to quit the message lo
vmpstr 2014/05/27 19:25:49 Done.
+ base::RunLoop run_loop;
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::current()->PostDelayedTask(
+ FROM_HERE, run_loop.QuitClosure(), delay);
+ run_loop.Run();
+ }
+
+ protected:
+ int notification_count_;
+ base::TimeTicks last_notification_time_;
+};
+
+TEST_F(DelayedUniqueNotifierTest, HalfSecondDelay) {
+ base::TimeDelta delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(500);
reveman 2014/05/27 19:02:17 Could this delay be 0 or TimeDelta::FromInternalVa
vmpstr 2014/05/27 19:25:49 Set to to FromInternalValue(1)
+ base::TimeDelta run_delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(600);
vmpstr 2014/05/27 18:14:59 This is a delay just so if we schedule on the same
reveman 2014/05/27 19:02:17 My suggestion above would allow you to remove the
vmpstr 2014/05/27 19:25:49 Done.
+ DelayedUniqueNotifier notifier(
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::current(),
+ base::Bind(&DelayedUniqueNotifierTest::Notify, base::Unretained(this)),
+ delay);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, NotificationCount());
+
+ // Basic schedule for 0.5 seconds from now.
+ base::TimeTicks expected_time = base::TimeTicks::Now() + delay;
+ notifier.Schedule();
+
+ // Expect that we ran only once at least |delay| from now.
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, NotificationCount());
+ EXPECT_GE(LastNotificationTime(), expected_time);
+
+ // 5 schedules should result in only one run.
+ for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
+ expected_time = base::TimeTicks::Now() + delay;
+ notifier.Schedule();
+ }
+
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, NotificationCount());
+ EXPECT_GE(LastNotificationTime(), expected_time);
+}
+
+TEST_F(DelayedUniqueNotifierTest, RescheduleDelay) {
+ base::TimeDelta delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(500);
+ base::TimeDelta run_delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(600);
+ DelayedUniqueNotifier notifier(
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::current(),
+ base::Bind(&DelayedUniqueNotifierTest::Notify, base::Unretained(this)),
+ delay);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, NotificationCount());
+
+ // Schedule constantly for some large number of times, so that the expected
+ // time goes beyond |delay| from now by some more or less considerable time.
+ base::TimeTicks expected_time;
+ for (int i = 0; i < 100000; ++i) {
vmpstr 2014/05/27 18:14:59 I could do some sort of a sleep here (as long as I
reveman 2014/05/27 19:02:17 100000 seems a bit random. Maybe we can just busy
vmpstr 2014/05/27 19:25:49 Done.
+ expected_time = base::TimeTicks::Now() + delay;
+ notifier.Schedule();
+ }
+
+ // Finish running and expect only one run.
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, NotificationCount());
+
+ EXPECT_GE(LastNotificationTime(), expected_time);
+}
+
+TEST_F(DelayedUniqueNotifierTest, Cancel) {
+ base::TimeDelta delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(500);
+ base::TimeDelta run_delay = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(600);
+ DelayedUniqueNotifier notifier(
+ base::MessageLoopProxy::current(),
+ base::Bind(&DelayedUniqueNotifierTest::Notify, base::Unretained(this)),
+ delay);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, NotificationCount());
+
+ // Schedule for |delay| seconds from now.
+ notifier.Schedule();
+
+ // Cancel the run.
+ notifier.Cancel();
+
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, NotificationCount());
+
+ // Schedule for |delay| seconds from now and let it run.
+ base::TimeTicks expected_time = base::TimeTicks::Now() + delay;
+ notifier.Schedule();
+
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, NotificationCount());
+ EXPECT_GE(LastNotificationTime(), expected_time);
+
+ // Schedule for |delay| seconds from now.
+ notifier.Schedule();
+
+ // Cancel the run again.
+ notifier.Cancel();
+
+ RunForTime(run_delay);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, NotificationCount());
+}
+} // namespace
+} // namespace cc
« no previous file with comments | « cc/base/delayed_unique_notifier.cc ('k') | cc/base/unique_notifier.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698