Move *GetWebApplicationInfo IPCs from "view" to "frame".

content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h

Index: content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h
diff --git a/content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h b/content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h
index 8292ece36a39c2d6af1fa679356ddad62b33fc23..edbee84028b9b0b003848be67222bb4759361c87 100644
--- a/content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h
+++ b/content/public/test/test_renderer_host.h
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ class RenderFrameHostTester {
   // RenderViewHostTestEnabler instance (see below) to do this.
   static RenderFrameHostTester* For(RenderFrameHost* host);
 
+  // Calls the RenderFrameHost's private OnMessageReceived function with the
+  // given message.
+  static bool TestOnMessageReceived(RenderFrameHost* rfh,
+                                    const IPC::Message& msg);

[jochen (gone - plz use gerrit), 2017/06/19 13:04:32]

why is the order of args reversed (compared to OnMessageReceived)?

[Łukasz Anforowicz, 2017/06/19 14:18:47]

For consistency with the already existing
RenderViewHostTester::TestOnMessageReceived.  I think having rvh/rfh as the
first argument makes sense, because this argument sort of acts like |this| would
(i.e. TestOnMessageReceived could alternatively be implemented as a
OnMessageReceivedForTesting *instance* method of RenderViewHost/RenderFrameHost;
 OTOH, I like the original author's idea of having this method here to avoid
polluting the public API of RVH/RFH with test-only methods). 

+
   static void CommitPendingLoad(NavigationController* controller);
 
   virtual ~RenderFrameHostTester() {}