IDL compiler: [CallWith] for setters

IDL compiler: [CallWith] for setters

Simple one, main change is now we need a function for the setter_expression,
analogous to the one for getter_expression.
(We'll add more cases to this in future.)

Docs:
https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/blink/webidl/blink-idl-extended-attributes#TOC-CallWith-m-a-

BUG=239771
NOTRY=true

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/blink?view=rev&revision=160000

[Nils Barth (inactive), 2013-10-19 03:18:30]

Quick one.

[haraken, 2013-10-19 04:40:48]

LGTM

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-19 04:45:47]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/nbarth@chromium.org/29153007/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2013-10-19 10:38:35]

Change committed as 160000

[Nils Barth (inactive), 2013-10-19 10:44:26]

On 2013/10/19 10:38:35, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> Change committed as 160000

Nice revision number (20^4).

[haraken, 2013-10-19 10:51:17]

On 2013/10/19 10:44:26, Nils Barth wrote:
> On 2013/10/19 10:38:35, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> > Change committed as 160000
> 
> Nice revision number (20^4).

I'd prefer some prime number though.

[Nils Barth (inactive), 2013-10-19 11:04:40]

On 2013/10/19 10:51:17, haraken wrote:
> On 2013/10/19 10:44:26, Nils Barth wrote:
> > On 2013/10/19 10:38:35, I haz the power (commit-bot) wrote:
> > > Change committed as 160000
> > 
> > Nice revision number (20^4).
> 
> I'd prefer some prime number though.

You won't have to wait long; 160001 is prime (and has already been hit):
http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/oddsends/primes.htm

Prime numbers are v. common though; by the prime number theorem there's a ~1/log
n
likelihood of a number being prime, so currently about 1/12 of revision numbers
are prime.
(The odds of a number being a 4th power drops off as 1/n^4 though; next one is
194481,
which might take a while ;-)

A Mersenne prime would be nice; last one was 131071 (1 year ago), next one is
524287,
which will probably take quite a while.

[haraken, 2013-10-19 11:14:01]

> A Mersenne prime would be nice; last one was 131071 (1 year ago), next one is
> 524287,
> which will probably take quite a while.

Sounds nice. But let's finish the IDL compiler rewrite before then :)

[Nils Barth (inactive), 2013-10-19 11:15:07]

On 2013/10/19 11:14:01, haraken wrote:
> > A Mersenne prime would be nice; last one was 131071 (1 year ago), next one
is
> > 524287,
> > which will probably take quite a while.
> 
> Sounds nice. But let's finish the IDL compiler rewrite before then :)

I don't think it'll take *quite* that many CLs ;)