Fix a typo in glBufferData and glBufferSubData 's arguments

The function glBufferData 's second argument type is GLsizeiptr, not GLsizei.
glBufferSubData 's second argument type is GLintptr, not GLint. And the third argument type is GLsizeiptr, not GLsizei.
A mistake in glBufferData and glBufferSubData 's arguments.

BUG=

Committed: https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=273106

[penghu, 2014-05-16 05:19:05]

The CQ bit was checked by penghu@tencent.com

[penghu, 2014-05-16 05:19:06]

The CQ bit was unchecked by penghu@tencent.com

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-21 19:06:00]

Thanks for noticing this but what prompted the change? This will only have an
effect on 64-bit platforms, and other recent decisions have been made that
Chrome will effectively only support buffers of size 2^32-1 on all platforms.

Could you please file a bug describing the issue you ran into in more detail?

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-21 19:07:13]

Also, have you signed the individual contributor licensing agreement per
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/contributing-code#TOC-Get-your-code-ready ?

[Wei Xiaohai, 2014-05-22 02:16:05]

On 2014/05/21 19:07:13, Ken Russell wrote:
> Also, have you signed the individual contributor licensing agreement per
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/contributing-code#TOC-Get-your-code-ready ?

Ken, we have already signed the corporate CLA for Tencent.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-22 02:57:15]

On 2014/05/22 02:16:05, jamesxwei wrote:
> On 2014/05/21 19:07:13, Ken Russell wrote:
> > Also, have you signed the individual contributor licensing agreement per
> > http://dev.chromium.org/developers/contributing-code#TOC-Get-your-code-ready
?
> 
> Ken, we have already signed the corporate CLA for Tencent.

OK, thanks. I'd still like to know how you found the discrepancy. Fixing it
won't have any visible effect because other parts of Chromium will still
restrict the size of buffers to 32-bit.

[penghu, 2014-05-22 03:30:05]

On 2014/05/22 02:57:15, Ken Russell wrote:
> On 2014/05/22 02:16:05, jamesxwei wrote:
> > On 2014/05/21 19:07:13, Ken Russell wrote:
> > > Also, have you signed the individual contributor licensing agreement per
> > >
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/contributing-code#TOC-Get-your-code-ready
> ?
> > 
> > Ken, we have already signed the corporate CLA for Tencent.
> 
> OK, thanks. I'd still like to know how you found the discrepancy. Fixing it
> won't have any visible effect because other parts of Chromium will still
> restrict the size of buffers to 32-bit.

I try a function pointer assignment, from gfx::ProcsGL to GrGLInterface. And get
a compile error that 'type does not match'. So, I browse the
http://www.khronos.org/, and find that discrepancy.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-24 02:31:07]

On 2014/05/22 03:30:05, penghu wrote:
> On 2014/05/22 02:57:15, Ken Russell wrote:
> > On 2014/05/22 02:16:05, jamesxwei wrote:
> > > On 2014/05/21 19:07:13, Ken Russell wrote:
> > > > Also, have you signed the individual contributor licensing agreement per
> > > >
> http://dev.chromium.org/developers/contributing-code#TOC-Get-your-code-ready
> > ?
> > > 
> > > Ken, we have already signed the corporate CLA for Tencent.
> > 
> > OK, thanks. I'd still like to know how you found the discrepancy. Fixing it
> > won't have any visible effect because other parts of Chromium will still
> > restrict the size of buffers to 32-bit.
> 
> I try a function pointer assignment, from gfx::ProcsGL to GrGLInterface. And
get
> a compile error that 'type does not match'. So, I browse the
> http://www.khronos.org/, and find that discrepancy.

OK, I see. Let's see how this change works on the GPU bots.

[penghu, 2014-05-26 05:42:45]

The CQ bit was checked by penghu@tencent.com

[penghu, 2014-05-26 05:42:46]

The CQ bit was unchecked by penghu@tencent.com

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-26 05:42:53]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/penghu@tencent.com/291493005/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-26 05:42:55]

The CQ bit was unchecked by commit-bot@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-26 05:42:55]

No LGTM from a valid reviewer yet. Only full committers are accepted.
Even if an LGTM may have been provided, it was from a non-committer or
a provisional committer, _not_ a full super star committer.
See http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/become-a-committer
Note that this has nothing to do with OWNERS files.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-27 21:48:35]

LGTM since the GPU bots' runs looked good.

[Ken Russell (switch to Gerrit), 2014-05-27 21:48:40]

The CQ bit was checked by kbr@chromium.org

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-27 21:49:54]

CQ is trying da patch. Follow status at
 https://chromium-status.appspot.com/cq/penghu@tencent.com/291493005/1

[commit-bot: I haz the power, 2014-05-28 01:44:37]

Change committed as 273106