Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(872)

Unified Diff: remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.cc

Issue 2907073003: [Chromoting] Add DataChannelManager to manage optional incoming data channels (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.cc
diff --git a/remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.cc b/remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ca4a1273bd44f74e7e5aa0ed87718d5b4449a59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe.h"
+
+#include "base/bind.h"
+#include "base/location.h"
+#include "base/memory/ptr_util.h"
+#include "base/threading/thread_task_runner_handle.h"
+#include "remoting/base/compound_buffer.h"
+#include "remoting/protocol/fake_message_pipe_wrapper.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace remoting {
+namespace protocol {
+
+FakeMessagePipe::FakeMessagePipe(bool asynchronous)
+ : asynchronous_(asynchronous) {}
+
+FakeMessagePipe::~FakeMessagePipe() = default;
+
+std::unique_ptr<FakeMessagePipeWrapper> FakeMessagePipe::Wrap() {
+ return base::MakeUnique<FakeMessagePipeWrapper>(this);
+}
+
+void FakeMessagePipe::Start(EventHandler* event_handler) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(event_handler_ == nullptr);
joedow 2017/05/30 16:24:18 You should avoid adding ASSERT statements in class
Hzj_jie 2017/05/31 00:11:53 But this class itself is for testing purpose only.
+ ASSERT_TRUE(event_handler != nullptr);
+ event_handler_ = event_handler;
+}
+
+void FakeMessagePipe::Send(google::protobuf::MessageLite* message,
+ const base::Closure& done) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pipe_opened_);
+ if (asynchronous_) {
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE, done);
+ return;
+ }
+ done.Run();
+}
+
+void FakeMessagePipe::Receive(std::unique_ptr<CompoundBuffer> message) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ if (asynchronous_) {
joedow 2017/05/30 16:24:18 Can you move the duplicated logic (sync vs. async)
Hzj_jie 2017/05/31 00:11:53 Done.
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(
+ [](FakeMessagePipe* me,
+ std::unique_ptr<CompoundBuffer> message) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(me->pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(me->event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ if (message) {
+ message->Lock();
+ }
+ me->event_handler_->OnMessageReceived(std::move(message));
+ },
+ base::Unretained(this),
+ base::Passed(std::move(message))));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (message) {
+ message->Lock();
+ }
+ event_handler_->OnMessageReceived(std::move(message));
+}
+
+void FakeMessagePipe::OpenPipe() {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ if (asynchronous_) {
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(
+ [](FakeMessagePipe* me) {
+ ASSERT_FALSE(me->pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(me->event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ me->pipe_opened_ = true;
+ me->event_handler_->OnMessagePipeOpen();
+ },
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ pipe_opened_ = true;
+ event_handler_->OnMessagePipeOpen();
+}
+
+void FakeMessagePipe::ClosePipe() {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ if (asynchronous_) {
+ base::ThreadTaskRunnerHandle::Get()->PostTask(FROM_HERE, base::Bind(
+ [](FakeMessagePipe* me) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(me->pipe_opened_);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(me->event_handler_ != nullptr);
+ me->pipe_opened_ = false;
+ me->event_handler_->OnMessagePipeClosed();
+ },
+ base::Unretained(this)));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ pipe_opened_ = false;
+ event_handler_->OnMessagePipeClosed();
+}
+
+} // namespace protocol
+} // namespace remoting

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698