Chromium Code Reviews| Index: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html |
| diff --git a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html |
| index d842378be757d9a02801522b78c2ff98eb0be072..7af709f3deadafd5362c12a3130189c05e85110b 100644 |
| --- a/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html |
| +++ b/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html |
| @@ -5,60 +5,73 @@ |
| <script src="resources/test-helpers.sub.js"></script> |
| <script> |
| // Tests that ServiceWorker objects representing the same Service Worker |
| -// entity have the same state. JS object equality is not tested, since the spec |
| -// does not require it. |
| +// entity have the same state. JS-level equality is now required according to |
| +// the spec. |
|
falken
2017/05/29 04:06:26
I think we lost the asserts about JS level equalit
mike3
2017/05/29 15:30:49
Acknowledged.
|
| +'use strict'; |
| + |
| +function nextChange(worker) { |
| + return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) { |
| + worker.addEventListener('statechange', function handler(event) { |
| + try { |
| + worker.removeEventListener('statechange', handler); |
| + resolve(event.currentTarget.state); |
| + } catch (err) { |
| + reject(err); |
| + } |
| + }); |
| + }); |
| +} |
| + |
| promise_test(function(t) { |
| var scope = 'resources/synced-state'; |
| var script = 'resources/empty-worker.js'; |
| + var registration, worker; |
| + |
| return service_worker_unregister_and_register(t, script, scope) |
| - .then(function(registration) { |
| - return new Promise(function(resolve) { |
| - var step = 0; |
| - registration.installing.addEventListener('statechange', |
| - function(e) { |
| - step++; |
| - if (step == 1) { |
| - assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'installed', |
| - 'original SW should be installed'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| - 'in installed, .installing should be null'); |
| - // The Activate algorithm may have cleared the waiting worker |
| - // by now. |
| - if (registration.waiting) { |
| - assert_equals(registration.waiting.state, 'installed', |
| - 'in installed, .waiting should be installed'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.active, null, |
| - 'in installed, .active should be null'); |
| - } else { |
| - assert_equals(registration.active.state, 'activating', |
| - 'in installed, .active should be activating'); |
| - } |
| - } else if (step == 2) { |
| - assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'activating', |
| - 'original SW should be activating'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| - 'in activating, .installing should be null'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.waiting, null, |
| - 'in activating, .waiting should be null'); |
| - assert_equals( |
| - registration.active.state, 'activating', |
| - 'in activating, .active should be activating'); |
| - } else if (step == 3) { |
| - assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'activated', |
| - 'original SW should be activated'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| - 'in activated, .installing should be null'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.waiting, null, |
| - 'in activated, .waiting should be null'); |
| - assert_equals(registration.active.state, 'activated', |
| - 'in activated .active should be activated'); |
| - resolve(); |
| - } |
| - }) |
| - }) |
| + .then(function(r) { |
| + registration = r; |
| + worker = registration.installing; |
| + |
| + t.add_cleanup(function() { |
| + r.unregister(); |
| + }); |
| + |
| + return nextChange(worker); |
| + }) |
| + .then(function(state) { |
| + assert_equals(state, 'installed', |
| + 'original SW should be installed'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| + 'in installed, .installing should be null'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.waiting.state, 'installed', |
| + 'in installed, .waiting should be installed'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.active, null, |
| + 'in installed, .active should be null'); |
|
falken
2017/05/29 04:06:25
assert_equals(registration.waiting, worker, ...);
mike3
2017/05/29 15:30:49
Done.
|
| + |
| + return nextChange(worker); |
| + }) |
| + .then(function(state) { |
| + assert_equals(state, 'activating', |
| + 'original SW should be activating'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| + 'in activating, .installing should be null'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.waiting, null, |
| + 'in activating, .waiting should be null'); |
| + assert_equals( |
| + registration.active.state, 'activating', |
| + 'in activating, .active should be activating'); |
|
falken
2017/05/29 04:06:25
assert_equals(registration.active, worker, ..);
mike3
2017/05/29 15:30:49
Done.
|
| + |
| + return nextChange(worker); |
| }) |
| - .then(function() { |
| - return service_worker_unregister_and_done(t, scope); |
| + .then(function(state) { |
| + assert_equals(state, 'activated', |
| + 'original SW should be activated'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.installing, null, |
| + 'in activated, .installing should be null'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.waiting, null, |
| + 'in activated, .waiting should be null'); |
| + assert_equals(registration.active.state, 'activated', |
| + 'in activated .active should be activated'); |
|
falken
2017/05/29 04:06:25
assert_equals(registration.active, worker, ...)
mike3
2017/05/29 15:30:49
Done.
|
| }); |
| }, 'worker objects for the same entity have the same state'); |
| </script> |