third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/synced-state.html - Issue 2899343003: Upstream service worker "statechange" tests to WPT

Side by Side Diff: third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/synced-state.html

Issue 2899343003: Upstream service worker "statechange" tests to WPT (Closed)

Patch Set: Created 3 years, 6 months ago

Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.

Jump to:

« third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/synced-state.https.html ('K') | « third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/http/tests/serviceworker/state.html ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Hide Comments ('s')

OLD	NEW
	(Empty)
1 <!doctype html>

2 <title>ServiceWorker: worker objects have synced state</title>

3 <script src="../resources/testharness.js"></script>

4 <script src="../resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>

5 <script src="resources/test-helpers.js"></script>

6 <script>

7 // Tests that ServiceWorker objects representing the same Service Worker

8 // entity have the same state. JS-level equality is now required according to

9 // the spec.

10 promise_test(function(t) {

11 var scope = 'resources/synced-state';

12 var script = 'resources/empty-worker.js';

13 var registration;

14 return service_worker_unregister_and_register(t, script, scope)

15 .then(function(r) {

16 var step = 0;

17 registration = r;

18 add_completion_callback(function() { r.unregister(); });

19 return new Promise(function(resolve) {

20 r.installing.addEventListener('statechange', function(e) {

21 step++;

22 if (step == 1) {

23 assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'installed',

24 'original SW should be installed');

25 assert_equals(r.installing, null,

26 'in installed, .installing should be null');

27 assert_equals(r.waiting.state, 'installed',

28 'in installed, the state of .waiting ' +

29 'should be installed');

30 assert_equals(r.active, null,

31 'in installed, .active should be null');

32 assert_equals(r.waiting, e.currentTarget,

33 '.waiting should be equal to the original ' +

34 'SW in installed');

35 } else if (step == 2) {

36 assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'activating',

37 'original SW should be activating');

38 assert_equals(r.installing, null,

39 'in activating, .installing should be null');

40 assert_equals(r.waiting, null,

41 'in activating, .waiting should be null');

42 assert_equals(r.active.state, 'activating',

43 'in activating, the state of .active ' +

44 'should be activating');

45 assert_equals(r.active, e.currentTarget,

46 '.active should be equal to the original ' +

47 'SW in activating');

48 } else if (step == 3) {

49 assert_equals(e.currentTarget.state, 'activated',

50 'original SW should be activated');

51 assert_equals(r.installing, null,

52 'in activated, .installing should be null');

53 assert_equals(r.waiting, null,

54 'in activated, .waiting should be null');

55 assert_equals(r.active.state, 'activated',

56 'in activated, the state of .active should ' +

57 'be activated');

58 assert_equals(r.active, e.currentTarget,

59 '.active should be equal to the original ' +

60 'SW in activated');

61 resolve();

62 }

63 });

64 });

65 })

66 .then(function() {

67 return navigator.serviceWorker.getRegistration(scope);

68 })

69 .then(function(r) {

70 assert_equals(r, registration, 'getRegistration should return the ' +

71 'same object with the registered one');
falken 2017/05/29 04:06:25 We seem to have lost the asserts in lines 67-71. We seem to have lost the asserts in lines 67-71. mike3 2017/05/29 15:30:49 Acknowledged. Show quoted text On 2017/05/29 04:06:25, falken wrote: > We seem to have lost the asserts in lines 67-71. Acknowledged.
72 });

73 }, 'worker objects for the same entity have the same state');

74 </script>

OLD	NEW