Chromium Code Reviews| Index: ash/login/lock_screen_controller_unittest.cc |
| diff --git a/ash/login/lock_screen_controller_unittest.cc b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller_unittest.cc |
| index 3e42c9ee679438c372efa3643aa090e7051d6d41..45fec82779369f1e268332e4b23859cf02750db7 100644 |
| --- a/ash/login/lock_screen_controller_unittest.cc |
| +++ b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller_unittest.cc |
| @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ TEST_F(LockScreenControllerTest, RequestAuthentication) { |
| AccountId id = AccountId::FromUserEmail("user1@test.com"); |
| // We hardcode the hashed password. This is fine because the password hash |
| - // algorithm should never accidently change; if it does we will need to |
| + // algorithm should never accidentally change; if it does we will need to |
| // have cryptohome migration code and one failing test isn't a problem. |
| std::string password = "password"; |
| std::string hashed_password = "40c7b00f3bccc7675ec5b732de4bfbe4"; |
| @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ TEST_F(LockScreenControllerTest, RequestAuthentication) { |
| // Verify AuthenticateUser mojo call is run with the same account id, a |
| // (hashed) password, and the correct PIN state. |
| - EXPECT_CALL(*client, AuthenticateUser(id, hashed_password, false)); |
| - controller->AuthenticateUser(id, password, false); |
| + EXPECT_CALL(*client, AuthenticateUser_(id, hashed_password, false, _)); |
| + controller->AuthenticateUser(id, password, false, |
| + base::BindOnce([](bool auth_success) {})); |
|
xiyuan
2017/06/06 22:37:51
nit: use mojom::LockScreenClient::AuthenticateUser
jdufault
2017/06/07 18:58:35
Done.
|
| base::RunLoop().RunUntilIdle(); |
| } |