Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(6410)

Unified Diff: ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc

Issue 2896093003: cros: Make sure views-based lock screen is destroyed after it is dismissed. (Closed)
Patch Set: Add new mojo calls Created 3 years, 6 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
diff --git a/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
index 5ff835e034049bb50717f77809a1f13da4591d08..3c3c07e7713e8534ca8de398a12625b041ccea0c 100644
--- a/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
+++ b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include "ash/login/lock_screen_controller.h"
+#include "ash/login/ui/lock_screen.h"
#include "chromeos/cryptohome/system_salt_getter.h"
#include "chromeos/login/auth/user_context.h"
@@ -17,15 +18,28 @@ void LockScreenController::BindRequest(mojom::LockScreenRequest request) {
bindings_.AddBinding(this, std::move(request));
}
-void LockScreenController::AuthenticateUser(const AccountId& account_id,
- const std::string& password,
- bool authenticated_by_pin) {
+void LockScreenController::AuthenticateUser(
+ const AccountId& account_id,
+ const std::string& password,
+ bool authenticated_by_pin,
+ mojom::LockScreenClient::AuthenticateUserCallback callback) {
if (!lock_screen_client_)
return;
- chromeos::SystemSaltGetter::Get()->GetSystemSalt(base::Bind(
+ // We cannot execute auth requests directly via GetSystemSalt because it
+ // expects a base::Callback instance, but |callback| is a base::OnceCallback.
+ // Instead, we store |callback| on this object and invoke it locally once we
+ // have the system salt.
+ pending_user_auths_.emplace_back(base::BindOnce(
&LockScreenController::DoAuthenticateUser, base::Unretained(this),
- account_id, password, authenticated_by_pin));
+ account_id, password, authenticated_by_pin, std::move(callback)));
xiyuan 2017/06/06 22:37:51 nit: DCHECK_EQ(1u, pending_user_auths_.size()), si
jdufault 2017/06/07 18:58:35 Removed support for >1 concurrent auth.
+ chromeos::SystemSaltGetter::Get()->GetSystemSalt(base::Bind(
+ &LockScreenController::OnGetSystemSalt, base::Unretained(this)));
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::ShowLockScreen(ShowLockScreenCallback on_shown) {
+ ::ash::ShowLockScreen();
+ std::move(on_shown).Run(true);
}
void LockScreenController::SetClient(mojom::LockScreenClientPtr client) {
@@ -43,17 +57,26 @@ void LockScreenController::ClearErrors() {
NOTIMPLEMENTED();
}
-void LockScreenController::DoAuthenticateUser(const AccountId& account_id,
- const std::string& password,
- bool authenticated_by_pin,
- const std::string& system_salt) {
+void LockScreenController::DoAuthenticateUser(
+ const AccountId& account_id,
+ const std::string& password,
+ bool authenticated_by_pin,
+ mojom::LockScreenClient::AuthenticateUserCallback callback,
+ const std::string& system_salt) {
// Hash password before sending through mojo.
// TODO(xiaoyinh): Pin is hashed differently by using a different salt and
// a different hash algorithm. Update this part in PinStorage.
chromeos::Key key(password);
key.Transform(chromeos::Key::KEY_TYPE_SALTED_SHA256_TOP_HALF, system_salt);
- lock_screen_client_->AuthenticateUser(account_id, key.GetSecret(),
- authenticated_by_pin);
+ lock_screen_client_->AuthenticateUser(
+ account_id, key.GetSecret(), authenticated_by_pin, std::move(callback));
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::OnGetSystemSalt(const std::string& system_salt) {
+ std::vector<PendingAuthenticateUserCall> auths;
+ std::swap(auths, pending_user_auths_);
+ for (auto& auth_call : auths)
+ std::move(auth_call).Run(system_salt);
}
} // namespace ash

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698