Network traffic annotation added to URLLoaderImpl.

content/common/network_traffic_annotation_param_traits.h

Index: content/common/network_traffic_annotation_param_traits.h
diff --git a/content/common/network_traffic_annotation_param_traits.h b/content/common/network_traffic_annotation_param_traits.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..292af0248ea83ac80f2fca09a4f17022c8abd0df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/common/network_traffic_annotation_param_traits.h
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+//
+// IPC Messages sent between compositor instances.
+
+#ifndef CONTENT_COMMON_NETWORK_TRAFFIC_ANNOTATION_PARAM_TRAITS_H_
+#define CONTENT_COMMON_NETWORK_TRAFFIC_ANNOTATION_PARAM_TRAITS_H_
+
+#include "cc/base/filter_operation.h"
+#include "cc/ipc/cc_ipc_export.h"
+#include "cc/ipc/cc_param_traits_macros.h"
+#include "cc/output/compositor_frame.h"
+#include "ipc/ipc_message_macros.h"
+#include "net/traffic_annotation/network_traffic_annotation.h"
+
+namespace IPC {
+
+template <>
+struct CC_IPC_EXPORT ParamTraits<net::MutableNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag> {

[yzshen1, 2017/06/02 15:06:18]

Have you considered defining a mojom type and then use StructTraits, instead of
marking it as "Native" and use the old-style ParamTraits? We sometimes reuse
ParamTraits from the legacy IPCs, but seldom introduce new ones.

I notice that net::PartialNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag has different fields
depending on whether we are in debug mode. mojom type doesn't support
preprocessor directives, so maybe it makes sense to use ParamTraits. But please
see my other comment below.

[Ramin Halavati, 2017/06/02 16:46:03]

Acknowledged.

+  typedef net::MutableNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag param_type;
+  static void GetSize(base::PickleSizer* s, const param_type& p);
+  static void Write(base::Pickle* m, const param_type& p);
+  static bool Read(const base::Pickle* m,
+                   base::PickleIterator* iter,
+                   param_type* p);
+  static void Log(const param_type& p, std::string* l);
+};
+
+template <>
+struct CC_IPC_EXPORT
+    ParamTraits<net::MutablePartialNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag> {

[yzshen1, 2017/06/02 15:06:18]

Is this going to be used in future CLs?
I notice net::MutablePartialNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag is not used by mojo
interfaces.

[Ramin Halavati, 2017/06/02 16:46:03]

It is not used now, and I am not sure when we would use it. I just thought as
they might be replaced with each other occasionally, it's better to define both.
Do you prefer if I remove this and change the other one to StructTraits?

+  typedef net::MutablePartialNetworkTrafficAnnotationTag param_type;
+  static void GetSize(base::PickleSizer* s, const param_type& p);
+  static void Write(base::Pickle* m, const param_type& p);
+  static bool Read(const base::Pickle* m,
+                   base::PickleIterator* iter,
+                   param_type* p);
+  static void Log(const param_type& p, std::string* l);
+};
+
+}  // namespace IPC
+
+#endif  // CONTENT_COMMON_NETWORK_TRAFFIC_ANNOTATION_PARAM_TRAITS_H_