Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(685)

Unified Diff: src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc

Issue 2887053003: MIPS[64]: Reland of `Fix unaligned arguments storage in Wasm-to-interpreter entry` (Closed)
Patch Set: Fix the issue a bit differently Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc
diff --git a/src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc b/src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc
index bb984253017de9addbbc353615b0fb36e91b669a..183f8d5182ba56337b7459039172fe9a5d78f2e4 100644
--- a/src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc
+++ b/src/compiler/wasm-compiler.cc
@@ -2811,10 +2811,11 @@ void WasmGraphBuilder::BuildWasmInterpreterEntry(
sig->return_count() == 0 ? 0 : 1 << ElementSizeLog2Of(sig->GetReturn(0));
// Get a stack slot for the arguments.
- Node* arg_buffer = args_size_bytes == 0 && return_size_bytes == 0
- ? jsgraph()->IntPtrConstant(0)
- : graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->StackSlot(
- std::max(args_size_bytes, return_size_bytes)));
+ Node* arg_buffer =
+ args_size_bytes == 0 && return_size_bytes == 0
+ ? jsgraph()->IntPtrConstant(0)
+ : graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->StackSlot(
+ std::max(args_size_bytes, return_size_bytes), 8));
// Now store all our arguments to the buffer.
int param_index = 0;
@@ -2824,27 +2825,61 @@ void WasmGraphBuilder::BuildWasmInterpreterEntry(
Node* param = Param(param_index++);
if (Int64Lowering::IsI64AsTwoParameters(jsgraph()->machine(),
sig->GetParam(i))) {
- StoreRepresentation store_rep(wasm::kWasmI32,
- WriteBarrierKind::kNoWriteBarrier);
- *effect_ =
- graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
- Int32Constant(offset + kInt64LowerHalfMemoryOffset),
- param, *effect_, *control_);
-
- param = Param(param_index++);
- *effect_ =
- graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
- Int32Constant(offset + kInt64UpperHalfMemoryOffset),
- param, *effect_, *control_);
+ int alignment = offset % (1 << ElementSizeLog2Of(wasm::kWasmI32));
+ bool offset_aligned = (alignment == 0);
+
+ if (offset_aligned ||
Clemens Hammacher 2017/05/23 12:35:12 You introduce lots of code duplication here. Pleas
ivica.bogosavljevic 2017/05/23 13:54:40 I like this approach better, consider it done
+ jsgraph()->machine()->UnalignedStoreSupported(
+ MachineType::TypeForRepresentation(wasm::kWasmI32), 0)) {
+ StoreRepresentation store_rep(wasm::kWasmI32,
+ WriteBarrierKind::kNoWriteBarrier);
+
+ *effect_ = graph()->NewNode(
+ jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset + kInt64LowerHalfMemoryOffset), param,
+ *effect_, *control_);
+
+ param = Param(param_index++);
+ *effect_ = graph()->NewNode(
+ jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset + kInt64UpperHalfMemoryOffset), param,
+ *effect_, *control_);
+ } else {
+ UnalignedStoreRepresentation store_rep(wasm::kWasmI32);
+
+ *effect_ = graph()->NewNode(
+ jsgraph()->machine()->UnalignedStore(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset + kInt64LowerHalfMemoryOffset), param,
+ *effect_, *control_);
+
+ param = Param(param_index++);
+ *effect_ = graph()->NewNode(
+ jsgraph()->machine()->UnalignedStore(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset + kInt64UpperHalfMemoryOffset), param,
+ *effect_, *control_);
+ }
offset += 8;
} else {
MachineRepresentation param_rep = sig->GetParam(i);
- StoreRepresentation store_rep(param_rep,
- WriteBarrierKind::kNoWriteBarrier);
- *effect_ =
- graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
- Int32Constant(offset), param, *effect_, *control_);
+ int alignment = offset % (1 << ElementSizeLog2Of(param_rep));
+ bool offset_aligned = (alignment == 0);
+
+ if (offset_aligned ||
+ jsgraph()->machine()->UnalignedStoreSupported(
+ MachineType::TypeForRepresentation(param_rep), 0)) {
+ StoreRepresentation store_rep(param_rep,
+ WriteBarrierKind::kNoWriteBarrier);
+ *effect_ =
+ graph()->NewNode(jsgraph()->machine()->Store(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset), param, *effect_, *control_);
+
+ } else {
+ UnalignedStoreRepresentation store_rep(param_rep);
+ *effect_ = graph()->NewNode(
+ jsgraph()->machine()->UnalignedStore(store_rep), arg_buffer,
+ Int32Constant(offset), param, *effect_, *control_);
+ }
offset += 1 << ElementSizeLog2Of(param_rep);
}
}
@@ -3841,7 +3876,10 @@ Handle<Code> CompileWasmInterpreterEntry(Isolate* isolate, uint32_t func_index,
Zone zone(isolate->allocator(), ZONE_NAME);
Graph graph(&zone);
CommonOperatorBuilder common(&zone);
- MachineOperatorBuilder machine(&zone);
+ MachineOperatorBuilder machine(
+ &zone, MachineType::PointerRepresentation(),
+ InstructionSelector::SupportedMachineOperatorFlags(),
+ InstructionSelector::AlignmentRequirements());
JSGraph jsgraph(isolate, &graph, &common, nullptr, nullptr, &machine);
Node* control = nullptr;
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698