Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(2473)

Unified Diff: chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android_unittest.cc

Issue 2886433002: [Android] Adding content settings provider for notification channels (Closed)
Patch Set: Added unit tests (refactored out a class for jni calls) Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android_unittest.cc
diff --git a/chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android_unittest.cc b/chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c73026ccf0c838fc4a4b98dc91d484cd1e566b78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
raymes 2017/05/24 00:59:51 nit: I don't think we use (c) anymore https://chro
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "chrome/browser/notifications/notification_channels_provider_android.h"
+
+#include "base/memory/ptr_util.h"
+#include "base/values.h"
+#include "components/content_settings/core/browser/content_settings_pref.h"
+#include "components/content_settings/core/common/content_settings_pattern.h"
+#include "testing/gmock/include/gmock/gmock.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "url/gurl.h"
+
+using ::testing::Return;
+
+class NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest : public testing::Test {
+ public:
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest() {}
Peter Beverloo 2017/05/24 10:57:43 TEST_F(X, Y) means that you're creating a test wit
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.
+};
+
+class MockNotificationChannelsBridge
+ : public NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid::NotificationChannelsBridge {
+ public:
Peter Beverloo 2017/05/24 10:57:43 nit: define dtor
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done. Do I also need to define a ctor?
Peter Beverloo 2017/06/01 15:26:11 No, that's fine. It's just virtual destructors tha
+ MOCK_METHOD0(ShouldUseChannelSettings, bool());
+ MOCK_METHOD2(CreateChannel, void(const std::string&, bool));
+ MOCK_METHOD1(GetChannelStatus, NotificationChannelStatus(const std::string&));
+ MOCK_METHOD1(DeleteChannel, void(const std::string&));
+};
+
+TEST_F(
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest,
+ SetWebsiteSettingAllowedWhenChannelUnavailable_CreatesEnabledChannelAndReturnsTrue) {
Peter Beverloo 2017/05/24 10:57:42 Such descriptive names are super rare in Chromium
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 I'd argue that 'CreatesEnabledChannelWhenUnavailab
Peter Beverloo 2017/06/01 15:26:11 Okay!
+ auto* mock_bridge = new MockNotificationChannelsBridge();
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, ShouldUseChannelSettings()).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid channels_provider(
+ base::WrapUnique(mock_bridge));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, GetChannelStatus("https://example.com/"))
Peter Beverloo 2017/05/24 10:57:43 nit: consider using a constant for the origin.
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.
+ .WillOnce(Return(NotificationChannelStatus::UNAVAILABLE));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge,
+ CreateChannel("https://example.com/", true /* enabled */));
+
+ bool result = channels_provider.SetWebsiteSetting(
+ ContentSettingsPattern::FromString("https://example.com"),
+ ContentSettingsPattern(), CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_NOTIFICATIONS,
+ std::string(), new base::Value(CONTENT_SETTING_ALLOW));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, result);
raymes 2017/05/24 00:59:51 nit (here and below): EXPECT_TRUE(result)
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.
+
+ channels_provider.ShutdownOnUIThread();
+}
+
+TEST_F(
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest,
+ SetWebsiteSettingBlockedWhenChannelUnavailable_CreatesDisabledChannelAndReturnsTrue) {
+ auto* mock_bridge = new MockNotificationChannelsBridge();
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, ShouldUseChannelSettings()).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid channels_provider(
+ base::WrapUnique(mock_bridge));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, GetChannelStatus("https://example.com/"))
+ .WillOnce(Return(NotificationChannelStatus::UNAVAILABLE));
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge,
+ CreateChannel("https://example.com/", false /* enabled */));
+
+ bool result = channels_provider.SetWebsiteSetting(
+ ContentSettingsPattern::FromString("https://example.com"),
+ ContentSettingsPattern(), CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_NOTIFICATIONS,
+ std::string(), new base::Value(CONTENT_SETTING_BLOCK));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, result);
+
+ channels_provider.ShutdownOnUIThread();
+}
+
+TEST_F(NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest,
+ SetWebsiteSettingAllowedWhenChannelAllowed_NoopAndReturnsTrue) {
+ auto* mock_bridge = new MockNotificationChannelsBridge();
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, ShouldUseChannelSettings()).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid channels_provider(
+ base::WrapUnique(mock_bridge));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, GetChannelStatus("https://example.com/"))
+ .WillOnce(Return(NotificationChannelStatus::ENABLED));
+
+ bool result = channels_provider.SetWebsiteSetting(
+ ContentSettingsPattern::FromString("https://example.com"),
+ ContentSettingsPattern(), CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_NOTIFICATIONS,
+ std::string(), new base::Value(CONTENT_SETTING_ALLOW));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, result);
+
+ channels_provider.ShutdownOnUIThread();
+}
+
+TEST_F(NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest,
+ SetWebsiteSettingBlockedWhenChannelBlocked_NoopAndReturnsTrue) {
+ auto* mock_bridge = new MockNotificationChannelsBridge();
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, ShouldUseChannelSettings()).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid channels_provider(
+ base::WrapUnique(mock_bridge));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, GetChannelStatus("https://example.com/"))
+ .WillOnce(Return(NotificationChannelStatus::BLOCKED));
+
+ bool result = channels_provider.SetWebsiteSetting(
+ ContentSettingsPattern::FromString("https://example.com"),
+ ContentSettingsPattern(), CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_NOTIFICATIONS,
+ std::string(), new base::Value(CONTENT_SETTING_BLOCK));
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, result);
+
+ channels_provider.ShutdownOnUIThread();
+}
+
+TEST_F(NotificationChannelsProviderAndroidTest,
+ SetWebsiteSettingDefault_DeletesChannelAndReturnsTrue) {
+ auto* mock_bridge = new MockNotificationChannelsBridge();
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, ShouldUseChannelSettings()).WillOnce(Return(true));
+
+ NotificationChannelsProviderAndroid channels_provider(
+ base::WrapUnique(mock_bridge));
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(*mock_bridge, DeleteChannel("https://example.com/"));
+ bool result = channels_provider.SetWebsiteSetting(
+ ContentSettingsPattern::FromString("https://example.com"),
+ ContentSettingsPattern(), CONTENT_SETTINGS_TYPE_NOTIFICATIONS,
+ std::string(), nullptr);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(true, result);
+
+ channels_provider.ShutdownOnUIThread();
+}
raymes 2017/05/24 00:59:51 nit: could we have a test which checks that the pr
awdf 2017/06/01 15:11:22 Done.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698