Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(75)

Unified Diff: ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc

Issue 2876673002: mojo api for view based lockscreen (Closed)
Patch Set: comment Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
diff --git a/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7423303260be032491a555b48659353621a0808
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ash/login/lock_screen_controller.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "ash/login/lock_screen_controller.h"
+
+#include "chromeos/cryptohome/system_salt_getter.h"
+#include "chromeos/login/auth/user_context.h"
+
+namespace ash {
+
+LockScreenController::LockScreenController() {
+ chromeos::SystemSaltGetter::Get()->GetSystemSalt(base::Bind(
xiyuan 2017/05/15 20:39:41 SystemSaltGetter::Get() could return nullptr on te
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/05/16 17:32:50 Done. Added "+chromeos/cryptohome" in ash/mus/DEPS
+ &LockScreenController::OnSaltObtained, base::Unretained(this)));
+}
+
+LockScreenController::~LockScreenController() {}
+
+void LockScreenController::BindRequest(mojom::LockScreenRequest request) {
+ bindings_.AddBinding(this, std::move(request));
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::AuthenticateUser(const AccountId& account_id,
+ const std::string& password,
+ bool authenticated_by_pin) {
+ if (!system_salt_.empty()) {
+ DoAuthenticateUser(account_id, password, authenticated_by_pin,
+ system_salt_);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ chromeos::SystemSaltGetter::Get()->GetSystemSalt(base::Bind(
+ &LockScreenController::DoAuthenticateUser, base::Unretained(this),
+ account_id, password, authenticated_by_pin));
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::SetClient(mojom::LockScreenClientPtr client) {
+ lock_screen_client_ = std::move(client);
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::ShowErrorMessage() {
+ NOTIMPLEMENTED();
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::ClearErrors() {
+ NOTIMPLEMENTED();
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::DoAuthenticateUser(const AccountId& account_id,
+ const std::string& password,
+ bool authenticated_by_pin,
+ const std::string& system_salt) {
+ system_salt_ = system_salt;
+
+ // Hash password before sending through mojo.
+ // TODO(xiaoyinh@): Pin is hashed differently by using a different salt and
+ // a different hash algorithm. Update this part in PinStorage.
+ chromeos::UserContext user_context(account_id);
xiyuan 2017/05/15 20:39:41 |user_context| not used?
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/05/16 17:32:49 Removed, thanks!
+ chromeos::Key key(password);
+ key.Transform(chromeos::Key::KEY_TYPE_SALTED_SHA256_TOP_HALF, system_salt);
+ if (lock_screen_client_) {
+ lock_screen_client_->AuthenticateUser(account_id, key.GetSecret(),
+ authenticated_by_pin);
+ }
+}
+
+void LockScreenController::OnSaltObtained(const std::string& system_salt) {
+ system_salt_ = system_salt;
+}
James Cook 2017/05/15 21:15:00 Please write a test for this class. It can be some
xiaoyinh(OOO Sep 11-29) 2017/05/16 17:32:49 Thanks! I wrote a very simple test to verify that
+
+} // namespace ash

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698