Index: cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
diff --git a/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc b/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
index b947403a73883fdc2ee0c6d6b05d2d1b6771fccc..4447a5891f1b6dd2eea1b50df4e47b423f08bc47 100644 |
--- a/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
+++ b/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
@@ -243,14 +243,6 @@ void DisplayItemList::Finalize() { |
std::vector<gfx::Rect>().swap(visual_rects_); |
} |
-bool DisplayItemList::IsSuitableForGpuRasterization() const { |
- // TODO(wkorman): This is more permissive than Picture's implementation, since |
- // none of the items might individually trigger a veto even though they |
- // collectively have enough "bad" operations that a corresponding Picture |
- // would get vetoed. See crbug.com/513016. |
- return all_items_are_suitable_for_gpu_rasterization_; |
-} |
- |
size_t DisplayItemList::OpCount() const { |
return op_count_; |
} |