Index: cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
diff --git a/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc b/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
index f45219904982ccff0e70daffe5288f202cf564c7..832c81e0b4a75b79fc53e7cf70ad509e20e8d107 100644 |
--- a/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
+++ b/cc/paint/display_item_list.cc |
@@ -265,14 +265,6 @@ void DisplayItemList::Finalize() { |
std::vector<gfx::Rect>().swap(visual_rects_); |
} |
-bool DisplayItemList::IsSuitableForGpuRasterization() const { |
- // TODO(wkorman): This is more permissive than Picture's implementation, since |
- // none of the items might individually trigger a veto even though they |
- // collectively have enough "bad" operations that a corresponding Picture |
- // would get vetoed. See crbug.com/513016. |
- return all_items_are_suitable_for_gpu_rasterization_; |
-} |
- |
int DisplayItemList::ApproximateOpCount() const { |
return approximate_op_count_; |
} |