Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(125)

Unified Diff: syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.cc

Issue 2871863002: adds the security cookie check hook transform. (Closed)
Patch Set: Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
Index: syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.cc
diff --git a/syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.cc b/syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d4669c7e454836bdf404a13f82ac2044942f92fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// Copyright 2017 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+//
+
+#include "syzygy/instrument/transforms/security_cookie_check_hook_transform.h"
+
+#include "syzygy/pe/pe_utils.h"
+
+namespace instrument {
+namespace transforms {
+
+using block_graph::Displacement;
+using block_graph::Operand;
+
+const char SecurityCookieCheckHookTransform::kTransformName[] =
+ "SecurityCookieCheckHookTransform";
+
+bool SecurityCookieCheckHookTransform::TransformBlockGraph(
+ const TransformPolicyInterface* policy,
+ BlockGraph* block_graph,
+ BlockGraph::Block* header_block
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Indent parameters another +2 (4 from start of line
+) {
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move to the previous line.
+ BlockGraph::Block *__report_gsfailure = nullptr;
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:40 Move * to left (BlockGraph::Block* __report_gsfail
+ const BlockGraph::BlockMap &blocks = block_graph->blocks();
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move & to left.
+ for (const auto &block : blocks) {
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move & to left (auto& block)
+ std::string name(block.second.name());
+ if (name == "__report_gsfailure") {
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Make an anonymous namespaced static global at the
+ __report_gsfailure = block_graph->GetBlockById(block.first);
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 You've already got the block, no need to go throug
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (__report_gsfailure == nullptr) {
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Could not find __report_gsfailure.";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ LOG(INFO) << "Found a __report_gsfailure implementation, hooking it now..";
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:40 Remove extra period.
+ BlockGraph::Section* section_text = block_graph->FindOrAddSection(
+ pe::kCodeSectionName,
+ pe::kCodeCharacteristics
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Both of these parameters fit on one line, indented
+ );
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move to end of previous line.
+
+ // All of the below is needed to build the instrumentation via the assembler
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Missing period on comment.
+ BasicBlockSubGraph bbsg;
+ BasicBlockSubGraph::BlockDescription* block_desc = bbsg.AddBlockDescription(
+ "__my_report_gsfailure",
+ nullptr,
+ BlockGraph::CODE_BLOCK,
+ section_text->id(),
+ 1,
+ 0
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 These likely all fit on one line.
+ );
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move to end of previous line.
+
+ BasicCodeBlock* bb = bbsg.AddBasicCodeBlock("__my_report_gsfailure");
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Prefix with __syzygy_ maybe? Slightly more consist
+ block_desc->basic_block_order.push_back(bb);
+ BasicBlockAssembler assm(bb->instructions().begin(), &bb->instructions());
+ assm.mov(
+ Operand(Displacement(0xdeadbeef)),
+ assm::eax
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Indent another 2 spaces.
+ );
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move to previous line.
+
+ // Condense into a block
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Missing period on comment.
+ BlockBuilder block_builder(block_graph);
+ if (!block_builder.Merge(&bbsg)) {
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Failed to build __my_report_gsfailure block.";
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Create another string constant with this name and
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ // Exactly one new block should have been created
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 This should be a DCHECK (kind of like an assertion
+ if (block_builder.new_blocks().size() != 1) {
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Only one block should have been built.";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (__report_gsfailure->references().size() != 1) {
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Ditto with this as a DCHECK assertion.
+ VLOG(1) << "Only a single reference is expected.";
+ }
+
+ // Transfer the referrers to the new block, and delete the old one
+ BlockGraph::Block* __my_report_gsfailure = block_builder.new_blocks().front();
+ __report_gsfailure->TransferReferrers(
+ 0,
+ __my_report_gsfailure,
+ BlockGraph::Block::kTransferInternalReferences
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Indent all of these another 2 spaces, try to fit a
+ );
chrisha 2017/05/09 19:18:39 Move to end of previous line.
+
+ __report_gsfailure->RemoveAllReferences();
+ if (!block_graph->RemoveBlock(__report_gsfailure)) {
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Removing __report_gsfailure failed.";
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+} // namespace transforms
+} // namespace instrument

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698