Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(29)

Unified Diff: ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc

Issue 2870023002: Allow compositor locks to extend timeout. (Closed)
Patch Set: Add tests. Created 3 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « ui/compositor/compositor.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc
diff --git a/ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc b/ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc
index 7115bd43caf66883a5cdc62c7acc543005ccc1ad..502239e2f6254fa3b93dbeec01adb2bd7c3158da 100644
--- a/ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc
+++ b/ui/compositor/compositor_unittest.cc
@@ -243,6 +243,129 @@ TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, AddingLocksDoesNotExtendTimeout) {
EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
}
+TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, AllowAndExtendTimeout) {
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client1;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock1;
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client2;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock2;
+
+ base::TimeDelta timeout1 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1);
+ base::TimeDelta timeout2 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10);
+
+ // The first lock has a short timeout.
+ lock1 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client1, timeout1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ // Allow locks to extend timeout.
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(true);
+ // The second lock has a longer timeout, so the second one is used for both.
+ lock2 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client2, timeout2);
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(false);
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client1, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 Times(0) here
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:41 Done.
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client2, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout1);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout2 - timeout1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 EXPECT_CALL Times(1) here
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+}
+
+TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, ExtendingTimeoutStartingCreatedTime) {
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client1;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock1;
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client2;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock2;
+
+ base::TimeDelta timeout1 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(5);
+ base::TimeDelta timeout2 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10);
+
+ // The first lock has a short timeout.
+ lock1 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client1, timeout1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ base::TimeDelta time_elapse = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1);
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(time_elapse);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+
+ // Allow locks to extend timeout.
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(true);
+ // The second lock has a longer timeout, so the second one is used for both
+ // and start from the time second lock created.
+ lock2 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client2, timeout2);
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(false);
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client1, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 Times(0) for both clients here right?
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout1 - time_elapse);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client2, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 and Times(1) here for both?
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout2 - (timeout1 - time_elapse));
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+}
+
+TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, AllowButNotExtendTimeout) {
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client1;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock1;
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client2;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock2;
+
+ base::TimeDelta timeout1 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10);
+ base::TimeDelta timeout2 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1);
+
+ // The first lock has a longer timeout.
+ lock1 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client1, timeout1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ // Allow locks to extend timeout.
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(true);
+ // The second lock has a short timeout, so the first one is used for both.
+ lock2 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client2, timeout2);
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(false);
+
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client1, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 0
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:41 Done.
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client2, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout2);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout1 - timeout2);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 Times(1) down here for both
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:41 Done.
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+}
+
+TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, AllowingExtendDoesNotUseDeadClient) {
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client1;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock1;
+ testing::StrictMock<MockCompositorLockClient> lock_client2;
+ std::unique_ptr<CompositorLock> lock2;
+
+ base::TimeDelta timeout1 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1);
+ base::TimeDelta timeout2 = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(10);
+
+ lock1 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client1, timeout1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client1, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 Also EXPECT_CALL(client2).Times(0)
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout1);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+
+ // Allow locks to extend timeout.
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(true);
+ // |lock1| is timeout. The second lock can timeout on its own.
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 is timed out already.
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ lock2 = compositor()->GetCompositorLock(&lock_client2, timeout2);
+ compositor()->set_allow_locks_to_extend_timeout(false);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+ EXPECT_CALL(lock_client2, CompositorLockTimedOut()).Times(1);
danakj 2017/05/09 22:23:19 Also EXPECT_CALL(client1).Times(0)
wutao 2017/05/10 00:06:42 Done.
+ task_runner()->FastForwardBy(timeout2);
+ task_runner()->RunUntilIdle();
+ EXPECT_FALSE(compositor()->IsLocked());
+}
+
TEST_F(CompositorTestWithMockedTime, LockIsDestroyedDoesntTimeout) {
base::TimeDelta timeout = base::TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds(1);
« no previous file with comments | « ui/compositor/compositor.cc ('k') | no next file » | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698