OLD | NEW |
(Empty) | |
| 1 // Copyright (c) 2013, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file |
| 2 // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a |
| 3 // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file. |
| 4 |
| 5 library tests.html.mirrors_2_test; |
| 6 |
| 7 @MirrorsUsed(targets: "tests.html.mirrors_2_test") |
| 8 import 'dart:mirrors'; |
| 9 import 'dart:html'; |
| 10 import 'package:expect/expect.dart' show NoInline; |
| 11 import 'package:unittest/unittest.dart'; |
| 12 import 'package:unittest/html_config.dart'; |
| 13 import '../utils.dart'; |
| 14 |
| 15 /// Regression test for http://dartbug/28196 |
| 16 /// |
| 17 /// The constructor of a mixin application of a subclass of a Html element is |
| 18 /// normally not used. With mirrors the constructor can become available. The |
| 19 /// body of the factory has a 'receiver' with an exact type that is the mixin |
| 20 /// application. The constructor body functions of the superclasses are called |
| 21 /// using the interceptor calling convention. This creates an interceptor |
| 22 /// constant of the mixin application type. In issue 28196 the constant has a |
| 23 /// name containing '+' symbols, causing the program to crash during |
| 24 /// initializing the constant pool. |
| 25 |
| 26 main() { |
| 27 useHtmlConfiguration(); |
| 28 |
| 29 var registered = false; |
| 30 setUp(() => customElementsReady.then((_) { |
| 31 if (!registered) { |
| 32 registered = true; |
| 33 document.registerElement(A.tag, A); |
| 34 document.registerElement(B.tag, B); |
| 35 } |
| 36 })); |
| 37 |
| 38 test('reflectClass', () { |
| 39 expect('AA', new A().token()); |
| 40 expect('MM', new B().token()); |
| 41 reflectClass(B); |
| 42 }); |
| 43 } |
| 44 |
| 45 class A extends HtmlElement { |
| 46 static final tag = 'x-a'; |
| 47 factory A() => new Element.tag(tag); |
| 48 |
| 49 A.created() : super.created() { |
| 50 // This function must not be inlined otherwise there is no reference to the |
| 51 // interceptor constant. The `@NoInline()` annotation does not seem reliable |
| 52 // on generative constructor bodies. |
| 53 try { |
| 54 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 55 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 56 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 57 } finally { |
| 58 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 59 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 60 uninlinedMethod(); |
| 61 } |
| 62 } |
| 63 @NoInline() |
| 64 uninlinedMethod() {} |
| 65 |
| 66 token() => 'AA'; |
| 67 } |
| 68 |
| 69 class B extends A with M { |
| 70 static final tag = 'x-b'; |
| 71 factory B() => new Element.tag(tag); |
| 72 B.created() : super.created(); |
| 73 } |
| 74 |
| 75 class M { |
| 76 token() => 'MM'; |
| 77 } |
OLD | NEW |