Chromium Code Reviews
chromiumcodereview-hr@appspot.gserviceaccount.com (chromiumcodereview-hr) | Please choose your nickname with Settings | Help | Chromium Project | Gerrit Changes | Sign out
(345)

Side by Side Diff: cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.cc

Issue 285373003: Reland "cc: Remove layers that are not drawn from tile manager." (Closed) Base URL: svn://svn.chromium.org/chrome/trunk/src
Patch Set: Created 6 years, 7 months ago
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments. Draft comments are only viewable by you.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch | Annotate | Revision Log
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/resources/tile_manager.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 // Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved. 1 // Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be 2 // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
3 // found in the LICENSE file. 3 // found in the LICENSE file.
4 4
5 #include "cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.h" 5 #include "cc/layers/picture_layer_impl.h"
6 6
7 #include <algorithm> 7 #include <algorithm>
8 #include <limits> 8 #include <limits>
9 9
10 #include "base/time/time.h" 10 #include "base/time/time.h"
(...skipping 340 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
351 } 351 }
352 352
353 // Aggressively remove any tilings that are not seen to save memory. Note 353 // Aggressively remove any tilings that are not seen to save memory. Note
354 // that this is at the expense of doing cause more frequent re-painting. A 354 // that this is at the expense of doing cause more frequent re-painting. A
355 // better scheme would be to maintain a tighter visible_content_rect for the 355 // better scheme would be to maintain a tighter visible_content_rect for the
356 // finer tilings. 356 // finer tilings.
357 CleanUpTilingsOnActiveLayer(seen_tilings); 357 CleanUpTilingsOnActiveLayer(seen_tilings);
358 } 358 }
359 359
360 void PictureLayerImpl::DidUnregisterLayer() { 360 void PictureLayerImpl::DidUnregisterLayer() {
361 TRACE_EVENT0("cc", "PictureLayerImpl::DidUnregisterLayer");
362
361 layer_needs_to_register_itself_ = true; 363 layer_needs_to_register_itself_ = true;
364 RemoveAllTilings();
365
366 // If we're on the pending tree, this means we might have an active twin
367 // layer. If we don't require that we sync from the active layer again, we
368 // might go through CalculateDrawProperties again, which will cause us to call
369 // ManageTilings. This, in turn, will create high and low res tilings for this
370 // layer and try to apply the same layer to the active tree. However, the
371 // active tree would already have these tilings, which would cause us to
372 // CHECK. As a workaround, this simply requires that this layer first syncs
373 // the tilings from the active tree before doing ManageTilings.
374 // TODO(vmpstr): This might not be a requirement once
375 // https://codereview.chromium.org/271533011 lands.
376 if (layer_tree_impl()->IsPendingTree()) {
377 if (twin_layer_) {
378 twin_layer_->twin_layer_ = NULL;
379 twin_layer_ = NULL;
380 }
381 needs_post_commit_initialization_ = true;
enne (OOO) 2014/05/15 17:41:32 :( Just wait for https://codereview.chromium.org/
382 }
362 } 383 }
363 384
364 void PictureLayerImpl::UpdateTilePriorities() { 385 void PictureLayerImpl::UpdateTilePriorities() {
386 TRACE_EVENT0("cc", "PictureLayerImpl::UpdateTilePriorities");
387
388 DCHECK(IsDrawnRenderSurfaceLayerListMember());
365 DCHECK(!needs_post_commit_initialization_); 389 DCHECK(!needs_post_commit_initialization_);
366 CHECK(should_update_tile_priorities_); 390 CHECK(should_update_tile_priorities_);
367 391
368 if (layer_needs_to_register_itself_) { 392 if (layer_needs_to_register_itself_) {
369 layer_tree_impl()->tile_manager()->RegisterPictureLayerImpl(this); 393 layer_tree_impl()->tile_manager()->RegisterPictureLayerImpl(this);
370 layer_needs_to_register_itself_ = false; 394 layer_needs_to_register_itself_ = false;
371 } 395 }
372 396
373 if (layer_tree_impl()->device_viewport_valid_for_tile_management()) { 397 if (layer_tree_impl()->device_viewport_valid_for_tile_management()) {
374 visible_rect_for_tile_priority_ = visible_content_rect(); 398 visible_rect_for_tile_priority_ = visible_content_rect();
(...skipping 1182 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
1557 return iterator_index_ < iterators_.size(); 1581 return iterator_index_ < iterators_.size();
1558 } 1582 }
1559 1583
1560 bool PictureLayerImpl::LayerEvictionTileIterator::IsCorrectType( 1584 bool PictureLayerImpl::LayerEvictionTileIterator::IsCorrectType(
1561 PictureLayerTiling::TilingEvictionTileIterator* it) const { 1585 PictureLayerTiling::TilingEvictionTileIterator* it) const {
1562 return it->get_type() == iteration_stage_ && 1586 return it->get_type() == iteration_stage_ &&
1563 (**it)->required_for_activation() == required_for_activation_; 1587 (**it)->required_for_activation() == required_for_activation_;
1564 } 1588 }
1565 1589
1566 } // namespace cc 1590 } // namespace cc
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | cc/resources/tile_manager.h » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld 408576698