Add billing address as a mandatory field of Payments credit cards.

components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model_unittest.cc

Index: components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model_unittest.cc
diff --git a/components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model_unittest.cc b/components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7be2fa0a0fde897e370fe7328826486b1b37ac66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+// found in the LICENSE file.
+
+#include "components/autofill/core/browser/address_combobox_model.h"
+
+#include "components/autofill/core/browser/autofill_test_utils.h"
+#include "components/autofill/core/browser/test_personal_data_manager.h"
+#include "testing/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h"
+#include "third_party/libaddressinput/src/cpp/include/libaddressinput/region_data.h"
+
+namespace autofill {
+
+namespace {
+const char kAppLocale[] = "fr-CA";
+}
+
+TEST(AddressComboboxModelTest, Empty) {
+  TestPersonalDataManager test_personal_data_manager;
+
+  AddressComboboxModel model(test_personal_data_manager, kAppLocale);
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, model.GetItemCount());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(model.IsItemSeparatorAt(0));

[sebsg, 2017/05/02 22:58:55]

Can you also check that it's not at (1)?

[MAD, 2017/05/03 16:15:19]

I can't since there's only one item. :-)

[sebsg, 2017/05/03 19:19:29]

That makes sense :P

[MAD, 2017/05/03 23:50:47]

Acknowledged.

+  EXPECT_TRUE(model.GetItemIdentifierAt(0).empty());
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier("Anything"));
+}
+
+TEST(AddressComboboxModelTest, TwoAddresses) {

[sebsg, 2017/05/02 22:58:55]

Can you also add a test with only one address? Thanks!

[MAD, 2017/05/03 16:15:19]

We kind of do that in the test where we add a second one, but OK. :-)

+  TestPersonalDataManager test_personal_data_manager;
+  AutofillProfile profile1(test::GetFullProfile());
+  AutofillProfile profile2(test::GetFullProfile2());
+  test_personal_data_manager.AddTestingProfile(&profile1);
+  test_personal_data_manager.AddTestingProfile(&profile2);
+
+  AddressComboboxModel model(test_personal_data_manager, kAppLocale);
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, model.GetItemCount());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(model.IsItemSeparatorAt(0));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(model.IsItemSeparatorAt(1));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(model.GetItemIdentifierAt(0).empty());
+  EXPECT_TRUE(model.GetItemIdentifierAt(1).empty());
+  EXPECT_EQ(-1, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier("Anything"));
+  // The order is not guaranteed.

[sebsg, 2017/05/02 22:58:55]

Since you get profiles to suggest to get the billing address, one thing you
could do is to set a use count to one of the profiles

For example, if you set

profile1.set_use_count(100);

profile1 will always be shown before profile2 (which will have a default use
count of 1) since GetProfilesToSuggest gives you the profiles ordered by
frecency.

[MAD, 2017/05/03 16:15:19]

Cool! Thanks...

Done.

+  if (profile1.guid() == model.GetItemIdentifierAt(2)) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(profile2.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(3));
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile1.guid()));
+    EXPECT_EQ(3, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile2.guid()));
+  } else {
+    EXPECT_EQ(profile1.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(3));
+    EXPECT_EQ(profile2.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(2));
+    EXPECT_EQ(3, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile1.guid()));
+    EXPECT_EQ(2, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile2.guid()));
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(AddressComboboxModelTest, AddAnAddress) {
+  TestPersonalDataManager test_personal_data_manager;
+  AutofillProfile profile1(test::GetFullProfile());
+  test_personal_data_manager.AddTestingProfile(&profile1);
+
+  AddressComboboxModel model(test_personal_data_manager, kAppLocale);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, model.GetItemCount());
+  EXPECT_EQ(profile1.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile1.guid()));
+
+  AutofillProfile profile2(test::GetFullProfile2());
+  int new_profile_index = model.AddNewProfile(profile2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, new_profile_index);
+  EXPECT_EQ(4, model.GetItemCount());
+  EXPECT_EQ(profile2.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(3));
+  EXPECT_EQ(3, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile2.guid()));
+
+  // First profile shouldn't have changed, here the order is guaranteed.
+  EXPECT_EQ(profile1.guid(), model.GetItemIdentifierAt(2));
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, model.GetIndexOfIdentifier(profile1.guid()));
+}
+
+}  // namespace autofill