| Index: third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3100200/test/e_wal.test
|
| diff --git a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3100200/test/e_wal.test b/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3100200/test/e_wal.test
|
| deleted file mode 100644
|
| index 77ac83a0aef7470e460daca67408ce79bd87ba2a..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
|
| --- a/third_party/sqlite/sqlite-src-3100200/test/e_wal.test
|
| +++ /dev/null
|
| @@ -1,230 +0,0 @@
|
| -# 2011 May 06
|
| -#
|
| -# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
|
| -# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
|
| -#
|
| -# May you do good and not evil.
|
| -# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
|
| -# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
|
| -#
|
| -#***********************************************************************
|
| -#
|
| -
|
| -set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
|
| -source $testdir/tester.tcl
|
| -set testprefix e_wal
|
| -
|
| -db close
|
| -testvfs oldvfs -iversion 1
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-58297-14483 WAL databases can be created, read, and
|
| -# written even if shared memory is unavailable as long as the
|
| -# locking_mode is set to EXCLUSIVE before the first attempted access.
|
| -#
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-00449-33772 This feature allows WAL databases to be
|
| -# created, read, and written by legacy VFSes that lack the "version 2"
|
| -# shared-memory methods xShmMap, xShmLock, xShmBarrier, and xShmUnmap on
|
| -# the sqlite3_io_methods object.
|
| -#
|
| -# 1.1: "create" tests.
|
| -# 1.2: "read" tests.
|
| -# 1.3: "write" tests.
|
| -#
|
| -# All three done with VFS "oldvfs", which has iVersion==1 and so does
|
| -# not support shared memory.
|
| -#
|
| -sqlite3 db test.db -vfs oldvfs
|
| -do_execsql_test 1.1.1 {
|
| - PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL;
|
| -} {delete}
|
| -do_execsql_test 1.1.2 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE;
|
| - PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL;
|
| -} {exclusive wal}
|
| -do_execsql_test 1.1.3 {
|
| - CREATE TABLE t1(x, y);
|
| - INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2);
|
| -} {}
|
| -do_test 1.1.4 {
|
| - list [file exists test.db-shm] [file exists test.db-wal]
|
| -} {0 1}
|
| -
|
| -do_test 1.2.1 {
|
| - db close
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db -vfs oldvfs
|
| - catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 }
|
| -} {1 {unable to open database file}}
|
| -do_test 1.2.2 {
|
| - execsql { PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE }
|
| - execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 }
|
| -} {1 2}
|
| -do_test 1.2.3 {
|
| - list [file exists test.db-shm] [file exists test.db-wal]
|
| -} {0 1}
|
| -
|
| -do_test 1.3.1 {
|
| - db close
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db -vfs oldvfs
|
| - catchsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 4) }
|
| -} {1 {unable to open database file}}
|
| -do_test 1.3.2 {
|
| - execsql { PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE }
|
| - execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 4) }
|
| - execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 }
|
| -} {1 2 3 4}
|
| -do_test 1.3.3 {
|
| - list [file exists test.db-shm] [file exists test.db-wal]
|
| -} {0 1}
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-31969-57825 If EXCLUSIVE locking mode is set prior to
|
| -# the first WAL-mode database access, then SQLite never attempts to call
|
| -# any of the shared-memory methods and hence no shared-memory wal-index
|
| -# is ever created.
|
| -#
|
| -db close
|
| -sqlite3 db test.db
|
| -do_execsql_test 2.1.1 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE;
|
| - SELECT * FROM t1;
|
| -} {exclusive 1 2 3 4}
|
| -do_test 2.1.2 {
|
| - list [file exists test.db-shm] [file exists test.db-wal]
|
| -} {0 1}
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-36328-16367 In that case, the database connection
|
| -# remains in EXCLUSIVE mode as long as the journal mode is WAL; attempts
|
| -# to change the locking mode using "PRAGMA locking_mode=NORMAL;" are
|
| -# no-ops.
|
| -#
|
| -do_execsql_test 2.2.1 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL;
|
| - SELECT * FROM t1;
|
| -} {exclusive 1 2 3 4}
|
| -do_test 2.2.2 {
|
| - sqlite3 db2 test.db
|
| - catchsql {SELECT * FROM t1} db2
|
| -} {1 {database is locked}}
|
| -db2 close
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-63522-46088 The only way to change out of EXCLUSIVE
|
| -# locking mode is to first change out of WAL journal mode.
|
| -#
|
| -do_execsql_test 2.3.1 {
|
| - PRAGMA journal_mode = DELETE;
|
| - SELECT * FROM t1;
|
| -} {delete 1 2 3 4}
|
| -do_test 2.3.2 {
|
| - sqlite3 db2 test.db
|
| - catchsql {SELECT * FROM t1} db2
|
| -} {1 {database is locked}}
|
| -do_execsql_test 2.3.3 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL;
|
| - SELECT * FROM t1;
|
| -} {normal 1 2 3 4}
|
| -do_test 2.3.4 {
|
| - sqlite3 db2 test.db
|
| - catchsql {SELECT * FROM t1} db2
|
| -} {0 {1 2 3 4}}
|
| -db2 close
|
| -db close
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-57239-11845 If NORMAL locking mode is in effect for the
|
| -# first WAL-mode database access, then the shared-memory wal-index is
|
| -# created.
|
| -#
|
| -do_test 3.0 {
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db
|
| - execsql { PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL }
|
| - db close
|
| -} {}
|
| -do_test 3.1 {
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db
|
| - execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 }
|
| - list [file exists test.db-shm] [file exists test.db-wal]
|
| -} {1 1}
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-13779-07711 As long as exactly one connection is using
|
| -# a shared-memory wal-index, the locking mode can be changed freely
|
| -# between NORMAL and EXCLUSIVE.
|
| -#
|
| -do_execsql_test 3.2.1 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE;
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL;
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE;
|
| - INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 6);
|
| -} {exclusive normal exclusive}
|
| -do_test 3.2.2 {
|
| - sqlite3 db2 test.db
|
| - catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } db2
|
| -} {1 {database is locked}}
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-10993-11647 It is only when the shared-memory wal-index
|
| -# is omitted, when the locking mode is EXCLUSIVE prior to the first
|
| -# WAL-mode database access, that the locking mode is stuck in EXCLUSIVE.
|
| -#
|
| -do_execsql_test 3.2.3 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL;
|
| - SELECT * FROM t1;
|
| -} {normal 1 2 3 4 5 6}
|
| -do_test 3.2.4 {
|
| - catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } db2
|
| -} {0 {1 2 3 4 5 6}}
|
| -
|
| -do_catchsql_test 3.2.5 {
|
| - PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE;
|
| - INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, 8);
|
| -} {1 {database is locked}}
|
| -
|
| -db2 close
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-46197-42811 This means that the underlying VFS must
|
| -# support the "version 2" shared-memory.
|
| -#
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-55316-21772 If the VFS does not support shared-memory
|
| -# methods, then the attempt to open a database that is already in WAL
|
| -# mode, or the attempt convert a database into WAL mode, will fail.
|
| -#
|
| -db close
|
| -do_test 3.4.1 {
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db -vfs oldvfs
|
| - catchsql { SELECT * FROM t1 }
|
| -} {1 {unable to open database file}}
|
| -db close
|
| -do_test 3.4.2 {
|
| - forcedelete test.db2
|
| - sqlite3 db test.db2 -vfs oldvfs
|
| - catchsql { PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL }
|
| -} {0 delete}
|
| -db close
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-45540-25505 To prevent older versions of SQLite (prior
|
| -# to version 3.7.0, 2010-07-22) from trying to recover a WAL-mode
|
| -# database (and making matters worse) the database file format version
|
| -# numbers (bytes 18 and 19 in the database header) are increased from 1
|
| -# to 2 in WAL mode.
|
| -#
|
| -reset_db
|
| -do_execsql_test 4.1.1 { CREATE TABLE t1(x, y) }
|
| -do_test 4.1.2 { hexio_read test.db 18 2 } {0101}
|
| -do_execsql_test 4.1.3 { PRAGMA journal_mode = wAL } {wal}
|
| -do_test 4.1.4 { hexio_read test.db 18 2 } {0202}
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-02535-05811 One can explicitly change out of WAL mode
|
| -# using a pragma such as this: PRAGMA journal_mode=DELETE;
|
| -#
|
| -do_execsql_test 4.2.1 { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 1); } {}
|
| -do_test 4.2.2 { file exists test.db-wal } {1}
|
| -do_execsql_test 4.2.3 { PRAGMA journal_mode = delete } {delete}
|
| -do_test 4.2.4 { file exists test.db-wal } {0}
|
| -
|
| -# EVIDENCE-OF: R-60175-02388 Deliberately changing out of WAL mode
|
| -# changes the database file format version numbers back to 1 so that
|
| -# older versions of SQLite can once again access the database file.
|
| -#
|
| -do_test 4.3 { hexio_read test.db 18 2 } {0101}
|
| -
|
| -finish_test
|
|
|