| OLD | NEW |
| (Empty) |
| 1 # 2008 June 24 | |
| 2 # | |
| 3 # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of | |
| 4 # a legal notice, here is a blessing: | |
| 5 # | |
| 6 # May you do good and not evil. | |
| 7 # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. | |
| 8 # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. | |
| 9 # | |
| 10 #*********************************************************************** | |
| 11 # This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. | |
| 12 # | |
| 13 # $Id: select9.test,v 1.4 2008/07/01 14:39:35 danielk1977 Exp $ | |
| 14 | |
| 15 # The tests in this file are focused on test compound SELECT statements | |
| 16 # that have any or all of an ORDER BY, LIMIT or OFFSET clauses. As of | |
| 17 # version 3.6.0, SQLite contains code to use SQL indexes where possible | |
| 18 # to optimize such statements. | |
| 19 # | |
| 20 | |
| 21 # TODO Points: | |
| 22 # | |
| 23 # * Are there any "column affinity" issues to consider? | |
| 24 | |
| 25 set testdir [file dirname $argv0] | |
| 26 source $testdir/tester.tcl | |
| 27 | |
| 28 #------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| 29 # test_compound_select TESTNAME SELECT RESULT | |
| 30 # | |
| 31 # This command is used to run multiple LIMIT/OFFSET test cases based on | |
| 32 # the single SELECT statement passed as the second argument. The SELECT | |
| 33 # statement may not contain a LIMIT or OFFSET clause. This proc tests | |
| 34 # many statements of the form: | |
| 35 # | |
| 36 # "$SELECT limit $X offset $Y" | |
| 37 # | |
| 38 # for various values of $X and $Y. | |
| 39 # | |
| 40 # The third argument, $RESULT, should contain the expected result of | |
| 41 # the command [execsql $SELECT]. | |
| 42 # | |
| 43 # The first argument, $TESTNAME, is used as the base test case name to | |
| 44 # pass to [do_test] for each individual LIMIT OFFSET test case. | |
| 45 # | |
| 46 proc test_compound_select {testname sql result} { | |
| 47 | |
| 48 set nCol 1 | |
| 49 db eval $sql A { | |
| 50 set nCol [llength $A(*)] | |
| 51 break | |
| 52 } | |
| 53 set nRow [expr {[llength $result] / $nCol}] | |
| 54 | |
| 55 set ::compound_sql $sql | |
| 56 do_test $testname { | |
| 57 execsql $::compound_sql | |
| 58 } $result | |
| 59 #return | |
| 60 | |
| 61 set iLimitIncr 1 | |
| 62 set iOffsetIncr 1 | |
| 63 if {[info exists ::G(isquick)] && $::G(isquick) && $nRow>=5} { | |
| 64 set iOffsetIncr [expr $nRow / 5] | |
| 65 set iLimitIncr [expr $nRow / 5] | |
| 66 } | |
| 67 | |
| 68 set iLimitEnd [expr $nRow+$iLimitIncr] | |
| 69 set iOffsetEnd [expr $nRow+$iOffsetIncr] | |
| 70 | |
| 71 for {set iOffset 0} {$iOffset < $iOffsetEnd} {incr iOffset $iOffsetIncr} { | |
| 72 for {set iLimit 0} {$iLimit < $iLimitEnd} {incr iLimit} { | |
| 73 | |
| 74 set ::compound_sql "$sql LIMIT $iLimit" | |
| 75 if {$iOffset != 0} { | |
| 76 append ::compound_sql " OFFSET $iOffset" | |
| 77 } | |
| 78 | |
| 79 set iStart [expr {$iOffset*$nCol}] | |
| 80 set iEnd [expr {($iOffset*$nCol) + ($iLimit*$nCol) -1}] | |
| 81 | |
| 82 do_test $testname.limit=$iLimit.offset=$iOffset { | |
| 83 execsql $::compound_sql | |
| 84 } [lrange $result $iStart $iEnd] | |
| 85 } | |
| 86 } | |
| 87 } | |
| 88 | |
| 89 #------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| 90 # test_compound_select_flippable TESTNAME SELECT RESULT | |
| 91 # | |
| 92 # This command is for testing statements of the form: | |
| 93 # | |
| 94 # <simple select 1> <compound op> <simple select 2> ORDER BY <order by> | |
| 95 # | |
| 96 # where each <simple select> is a simple (non-compound) select statement | |
| 97 # and <compound op> is one of "INTERSECT", "UNION ALL" or "UNION". | |
| 98 # | |
| 99 # This proc calls [test_compound_select] twice, once with the select | |
| 100 # statement as it is passed to this command, and once with the positions | |
| 101 # of <select statement 1> and <select statement 2> exchanged. | |
| 102 # | |
| 103 proc test_compound_select_flippable {testname sql result} { | |
| 104 test_compound_select $testname $sql $result | |
| 105 | |
| 106 set select [string trim $sql] | |
| 107 set RE {(.*)(UNION ALL|INTERSECT|UNION)(.*)(ORDER BY.*)} | |
| 108 set rc [regexp $RE $select -> s1 op s2 order_by] | |
| 109 if {!$rc} {error "Statement is unflippable: $select"} | |
| 110 | |
| 111 set flipsql "$s2 $op $s1 $order_by" | |
| 112 test_compound_select $testname.flipped $flipsql $result | |
| 113 } | |
| 114 | |
| 115 ############################################################################# | |
| 116 # Begin tests. | |
| 117 # | |
| 118 | |
| 119 # Create and populate a sample database. | |
| 120 # | |
| 121 do_test select9-1.0 { | |
| 122 execsql { | |
| 123 CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); | |
| 124 CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f); | |
| 125 BEGIN; | |
| 126 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 'one', 'I'); | |
| 127 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL); | |
| 128 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 'five', 'V'); | |
| 129 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, 'seven', 'VII'); | |
| 130 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL); | |
| 131 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 'two', 'II'); | |
| 132 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 'four', 'IV'); | |
| 133 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL); | |
| 134 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(8, 'eight', 'VIII'); | |
| 135 INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10, 'ten', 'X'); | |
| 136 | |
| 137 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'two', 'IV'); | |
| 138 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'four', 'VIII'); | |
| 139 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, NULL, NULL); | |
| 140 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 'eight', 'XVI'); | |
| 141 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 'ten', 'XX'); | |
| 142 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6, NULL, NULL); | |
| 143 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(7, 'fourteen', 'XXVIII'); | |
| 144 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(8, 'sixteen', 'XXXII'); | |
| 145 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(9, NULL, NULL); | |
| 146 INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(10, 'twenty', 'XL'); | |
| 147 | |
| 148 COMMIT; | |
| 149 } | |
| 150 } {} | |
| 151 | |
| 152 # Each iteration of this loop runs the same tests with a different set | |
| 153 # of indexes present within the database schema. The data returned by | |
| 154 # the compound SELECT statements in the test cases should be the same | |
| 155 # in each case. | |
| 156 # | |
| 157 set iOuterLoop 1 | |
| 158 foreach indexes [list { | |
| 159 /* Do not create any indexes. */ | |
| 160 } { | |
| 161 CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) | |
| 162 } { | |
| 163 CREATE INDEX i2 ON t1(b) | |
| 164 } { | |
| 165 CREATE INDEX i3 ON t2(d) | |
| 166 } { | |
| 167 CREATE INDEX i4 ON t2(e) | |
| 168 }] { | |
| 169 | |
| 170 do_test select9-1.$iOuterLoop.1 { | |
| 171 execsql $indexes | |
| 172 } {} | |
| 173 | |
| 174 # Test some 2-way UNION ALL queries. No WHERE clauses. | |
| 175 # | |
| 176 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.2 { | |
| 177 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 | |
| 178 } {1 one 3 {} 5 five 7 seven 9 {} 2 two 4 four 6 {} 8 eight 10 ten 1 two 2 fou
r 3 {} 4 eight 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 twenty} | |
| 179 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.3 { | |
| 180 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 181 } {1 one 1 two 2 two 2 four 3 {} 3 {} 4 four 4 eight 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7
seven 7 fourteen 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty} | |
| 182 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.4 { | |
| 183 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2 | |
| 184 } {3 {} 9 {} 6 {} 3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 8 eight 4 eight 5 five 4 four 2 four 7 fourte
en 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 10 ten 5 ten 10 twenty 2 two 1 two} | |
| 185 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.5 { | |
| 186 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2 | |
| 187 } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 6 {} 7
fourteen 7 seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty} | |
| 188 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.6 { | |
| 189 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1 | |
| 190 } {3 {} 3 {} 6 {} 6 {} 9 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourte
en 1 one 7 seven 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two} | |
| 191 | |
| 192 # Test some 2-way UNION queries. | |
| 193 # | |
| 194 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.7 { | |
| 195 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 | |
| 196 } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7
seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty} | |
| 197 | |
| 198 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.8 { | |
| 199 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 200 } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7
seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty} | |
| 201 | |
| 202 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.9 { | |
| 203 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2 | |
| 204 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seve
n 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two} | |
| 205 | |
| 206 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.10 { | |
| 207 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2 | |
| 208 } {1 one 1 two 2 four 2 two 3 {} 4 eight 4 four 5 five 5 ten 6 {} 7 fourteen 7
seven 8 eight 8 sixteen 9 {} 10 ten 10 twenty} | |
| 209 | |
| 210 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 { | |
| 211 SELECT a, b FROM t1 UNION SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1 | |
| 212 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {} 4 eight 8 eight 5 five 2 four 4 four 7 fourteen 1 one 7 seve
n 8 sixteen 5 ten 10 ten 10 twenty 1 two 2 two} | |
| 213 | |
| 214 # Test some 2-way INTERSECT queries. | |
| 215 # | |
| 216 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.11 { | |
| 217 SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 | |
| 218 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}} | |
| 219 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.12 { | |
| 220 SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 221 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}} | |
| 222 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.13 { | |
| 223 SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2 | |
| 224 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}} | |
| 225 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.14 { | |
| 226 SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1 | |
| 227 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}} | |
| 228 test_compound_select_flippable select9-1.$iOuterLoop.15 { | |
| 229 SELECT a, b FROM t1 INTERSECT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2 | |
| 230 } {3 {} 6 {} 9 {}} | |
| 231 | |
| 232 # Test some 2-way EXCEPT queries. | |
| 233 # | |
| 234 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.16 { | |
| 235 SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 | |
| 236 } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten} | |
| 237 | |
| 238 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.17 { | |
| 239 SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 240 } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten} | |
| 241 | |
| 242 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.18 { | |
| 243 SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2 | |
| 244 } {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two} | |
| 245 | |
| 246 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.19 { | |
| 247 SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 1, 2 | |
| 248 } {1 one 2 two 4 four 5 five 7 seven 8 eight 10 ten} | |
| 249 | |
| 250 test_compound_select select9-1.$iOuterLoop.20 { | |
| 251 SELECT a, b FROM t1 EXCEPT SELECT d, e FROM t2 ORDER BY 2, 1 | |
| 252 } {8 eight 5 five 4 four 1 one 7 seven 10 ten 2 two} | |
| 253 | |
| 254 incr iOuterLoop | |
| 255 } | |
| 256 | |
| 257 do_test select9-2.0 { | |
| 258 execsql { | |
| 259 DROP INDEX i1; | |
| 260 DROP INDEX i2; | |
| 261 DROP INDEX i3; | |
| 262 DROP INDEX i4; | |
| 263 } | |
| 264 } {} | |
| 265 | |
| 266 proc reverse {lhs rhs} { | |
| 267 return [string compare $rhs $lhs] | |
| 268 } | |
| 269 db collate reverse reverse | |
| 270 | |
| 271 # This loop is similar to the previous one (test cases select9-1.*) | |
| 272 # except that the simple select statements have WHERE clauses attached | |
| 273 # to them. Sometimes the WHERE clause may be satisfied using the same | |
| 274 # index used for ORDER BY, sometimes not. | |
| 275 # | |
| 276 set iOuterLoop 1 | |
| 277 foreach indexes [list { | |
| 278 /* Do not create any indexes. */ | |
| 279 } { | |
| 280 CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) | |
| 281 } { | |
| 282 DROP INDEX i1; | |
| 283 CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(b, a) | |
| 284 } { | |
| 285 CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d DESC, e COLLATE REVERSE ASC); | |
| 286 } { | |
| 287 CREATE INDEX i3 ON t1(a DESC); | |
| 288 }] { | |
| 289 do_test select9-2.$iOuterLoop.1 { | |
| 290 execsql $indexes | |
| 291 } {} | |
| 292 | |
| 293 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 { | |
| 294 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 295 } {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 six
teen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL} | |
| 296 | |
| 297 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.2 { | |
| 298 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2, 1 | |
| 299 } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII
5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II} | |
| 300 | |
| 301 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.3 { | |
| 302 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 | |
| 303 ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1 | |
| 304 } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 on
e I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV} | |
| 305 | |
| 306 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 { | |
| 307 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 308 } {1 one I 2 two II 3 {} {} 4 four IV 5 ten XX 6 {} {} 7 fourteen XXVIII 8 six
teen XXXII 9 {} {} 10 twenty XL} | |
| 309 | |
| 310 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.5 { | |
| 311 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 ORDER BY 2,
1 | |
| 312 } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 4 four IV 7 fourteen XXVIII 1 one I 8 sixteen XXXII
5 ten XX 10 twenty XL 2 two II} | |
| 313 | |
| 314 test_compound_select_flippable select9-2.$iOuterLoop.6 { | |
| 315 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a<5 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE d>=5 | |
| 316 ORDER BY 2 COLLATE reverse, 1 | |
| 317 } {3 {} {} 6 {} {} 9 {} {} 2 two II 10 twenty XL 5 ten XX 8 sixteen XXXII 1 on
e I 7 fourteen XXVIII 4 four IV} | |
| 318 | |
| 319 test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 { | |
| 320 SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 EXCEPT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 321 } {4 5 6 7} | |
| 322 | |
| 323 test_compound_select select9-2.$iOuterLoop.4 { | |
| 324 SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a<8 INTERSECT SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE d<=3 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 325 } {1 2 3} | |
| 326 | |
| 327 } | |
| 328 | |
| 329 do_test select9-2.X { | |
| 330 execsql { | |
| 331 DROP INDEX i1; | |
| 332 DROP INDEX i2; | |
| 333 DROP INDEX i3; | |
| 334 } | |
| 335 } {} | |
| 336 | |
| 337 # This procedure executes the SQL. Then it checks the generated program | |
| 338 # for the SQL and appends a "nosort" to the result if the program contains the | |
| 339 # SortCallback opcode. If the program does not contain the SortCallback | |
| 340 # opcode it appends "sort" | |
| 341 # | |
| 342 proc cksort {sql} { | |
| 343 set ::sqlite_sort_count 0 | |
| 344 set data [execsql $sql] | |
| 345 if {$::sqlite_sort_count} {set x sort} {set x nosort} | |
| 346 lappend data $x | |
| 347 return $data | |
| 348 } | |
| 349 | |
| 350 # If the right indexes exist, the following query: | |
| 351 # | |
| 352 # SELECT t1.a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 353 # | |
| 354 # can use indexes to run without doing a in-memory sort operation. | |
| 355 # This block of tests (select9-3.*) is used to check if the same | |
| 356 # is possible with: | |
| 357 # | |
| 358 # CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 | |
| 359 # SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 | |
| 360 # | |
| 361 # It turns out that it is. | |
| 362 # | |
| 363 do_test select9-3.1 { | |
| 364 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } | |
| 365 } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort} | |
| 366 do_test select9-3.2 { | |
| 367 execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) } | |
| 368 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } | |
| 369 } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort} | |
| 370 do_test select9-3.3 { | |
| 371 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 372 } {1 1 2 2 3 sort} | |
| 373 do_test select9-3.4 { | |
| 374 execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) } | |
| 375 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 376 } {1 1 2 2 3 nosort} | |
| 377 do_test select9-3.5 { | |
| 378 execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT d FROM t2 } | |
| 379 cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 380 } {1 1 2 2 3 nosort} | |
| 381 do_test select9-3.X { | |
| 382 execsql { | |
| 383 DROP INDEX i1; | |
| 384 DROP INDEX i2; | |
| 385 DROP VIEW v1; | |
| 386 } | |
| 387 } {} | |
| 388 | |
| 389 # This block of tests is the same as the preceding one, except that | |
| 390 # "UNION" is tested instead of "UNION ALL". | |
| 391 # | |
| 392 do_test select9-4.1 { | |
| 393 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } | |
| 394 } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sort} | |
| 395 do_test select9-4.2 { | |
| 396 execsql { CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a) } | |
| 397 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 ORDER BY 1 } | |
| 398 } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nosort} | |
| 399 do_test select9-4.3 { | |
| 400 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 401 } {1 2 3 4 5 sort} | |
| 402 do_test select9-4.4 { | |
| 403 execsql { CREATE INDEX i2 ON t2(d) } | |
| 404 cksort { SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 405 } {1 2 3 4 5 nosort} | |
| 406 do_test select9-4.5 { | |
| 407 execsql { CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT a FROM t1 UNION SELECT d FROM t2 } | |
| 408 cksort { SELECT a FROM v1 ORDER BY 1 LIMIT 5 } | |
| 409 } {1 2 3 4 5 sort} | |
| 410 do_test select9-4.X { | |
| 411 execsql { | |
| 412 DROP INDEX i1; | |
| 413 DROP INDEX i2; | |
| 414 DROP VIEW v1; | |
| 415 } | |
| 416 } {} | |
| 417 | |
| 418 # Testing to make sure that queries involving a view of a compound select | |
| 419 # are planned efficiently. This detects a problem reported on the mailing | |
| 420 # list on 2012-04-26. See | |
| 421 # | |
| 422 # http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users%40sqlite.org/msg69746.html | |
| 423 # | |
| 424 # For additional information. | |
| 425 # | |
| 426 do_test select9-5.1 { | |
| 427 db eval { | |
| 428 CREATE TABLE t51(x, y); | |
| 429 CREATE TABLE t52(x, y); | |
| 430 CREATE VIEW v5 as | |
| 431 SELECT x, y FROM t51 | |
| 432 UNION ALL | |
| 433 SELECT x, y FROM t52; | |
| 434 CREATE INDEX t51x ON t51(x); | |
| 435 CREATE INDEX t52x ON t52(x); | |
| 436 EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN | |
| 437 SELECT * FROM v5 WHERE x='12345' ORDER BY y; | |
| 438 } | |
| 439 } {~/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Uses indices with "*" | |
| 440 do_test select9-5.2 { | |
| 441 db eval { | |
| 442 EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN | |
| 443 SELECT x, y FROM v5 WHERE x='12345' ORDER BY y; | |
| 444 } | |
| 445 } {~/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Uses indices with "x, y" | |
| 446 do_test select9-5.3 { | |
| 447 db eval { | |
| 448 EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN | |
| 449 SELECT x, y FROM v5 WHERE +x='12345' ORDER BY y; | |
| 450 } | |
| 451 } {/SCAN TABLE/} ;# Full table scan if the "+x" prevents index usage. | |
| 452 | |
| 453 # 2013-07-09: Ticket [490a4b7235624298]: | |
| 454 # "WHERE 0" on the first element of a UNION causes an assertion fault | |
| 455 # | |
| 456 do_execsql_test select9-6.1 { | |
| 457 CREATE TABLE t61(a); | |
| 458 CREATE TABLE t62(b); | |
| 459 INSERT INTO t61 VALUES(111); | |
| 460 INSERT INTO t62 VALUES(222); | |
| 461 SELECT a FROM t61 WHERE 0 UNION SELECT b FROM t62; | |
| 462 } {222} | |
| 463 do_execsql_test select9-6.2 { | |
| 464 SELECT a FROM t61 WHERE 0 UNION ALL SELECT b FROM t62; | |
| 465 } {222} | |
| 466 do_execsql_test select9-6.3 { | |
| 467 SELECT a FROM t61 UNION SELECT b FROM t62 WHERE 0; | |
| 468 } {111} | |
| 469 | |
| 470 | |
| 471 | |
| 472 finish_test | |
| OLD | NEW |